I Am Dude wrote on Feb 4th, 2009 at 4:14am:You're right, explaining a historical physical event is different than explaining a natural nonphysical phenomenon. However, reality is reality. Either Jesus was crucified or he wasn't, just as either our physical body is left alone during OBEs or it isn't. While my personal experience hasn't yet verified the details of the crucifixion, I have personally verified the fact that our physical body is not left as an isolated shell. Other more advanced explorers have found the same.
Vincent, you seem to have missed my point about comparing physical details and skewing of these, to translating nonphysical concepts into physical concepts, language, etc. in a way that is easy for us to comprehend more accurately. These are like comparing apples to oranges. Btw, i agree with you that a body is not left completely unresonated with by a probes consciousness until full physical death.
As i mentioned earlier, i don't believe that any channeled or psychically derived source is completely accurate, 100 percent of the time.
In Rosiland's case, it may just be an example of skewing, but its also possible that they just over simplified it to get the main point across, that in the etheric state one can be more easily influenced by stuck nonphysicals. That's the core of what they were saying, but perhaps they presented it in an overly simplified manner.
I tried to explain it in a more accurate and less simplified way, and i found it very difficult. At one point i had to dissociate a bit, and just let info flow in order to get the right concepts (in the right language) across and still it lacked. It is a rather complex and hard to understand topic for the left brain part of us.
Quote:I'm not saying you are wrong about Seth, I am simply saying we find Rosalind in a similar position as Roberts, for we have found inconsistencies in both of their material, this one existing in the spectrum of fear rather than love.
And i'm not saying that you are necessarily wrong about this particular bit of info in this work being an example of skewing. However, possession or something like it is a reality, and can be a very difficult situation--hence why cautions from not just Rosilands source, but also Cayce's source.
Whether or not this was an example of error and skewing, or a more simplified and thus less accurate depiction, i believe the basic, core concept is sound in that when one phases primarily in the etheric state i.e. resonates the physical field to the etheric field primarily, there is an easier opportunity for beings which are stuck in the etheric state to find an "opening" so to speak, to influence the said explorer--they can become too attached and enmeshed within the energy field of that person, which then causes lots of other issues.
Also, whatever the real reason behind this part, i do not believe that her guidance was actively trying to instill fear. Is one fear mongering when a parent tells its child to not to put its hand on the hot stove because it will hurt? Whether people want to believe it or not, there are difficult consequences both in the material and nonphysical planes. One of them is possession (i don't like this term, because it implies full bodily control of anothers body, and in my perception that is extremely rare).
I have some experience with possession, particularly with my Dad who is alcoholic. Now i've seen various sources mention that when the average person gets drunk, it leaves them much more open to being influenced by stuck folks. I know this by experience. I explained the whys pretty well and logically, just as i explained the whys and hows logically behind the OOB state and potential undue influence of stuck/unhappy beings.
Are you saying that you know for sure, a 100 percent that neither takes place, and that Rosilands source was just trying to instill fear in others?
Quote:I honestly believe this was more of Rosalind's belief than it was her guidance. I agree that some of Rosalind's guidance is dumbed down, not that it really needs to be when you look at the complexity and detail of some material out there these days. In fact, Rosalinds work is not much more complex than Monroes and the like, if it is at all, and therefore the issue of her needing to oversimplify the concepts does not apply. In fact, this excuse does not apply for another reason- what is stated is not an oversimplification, it is simply false.
I will put this into a broader perspective. Cayce gave his readings from the early 1900's to almost mid 1940's. He was stretching the minds and beliefs of people back then with certain specific concepts and info.
Rosiland worked with Monroe in the latter 70's and very early 80's (i believe). Bob's 1st book was published originally before he met Rosiland. Bob's 1st book is pretty simple and lacking a lot in breadth of info and insight. Bob and Bob's 1st book when i read it, struck me as pretty clueless in some respects and that was as a 16 year old reading it.
Bob wrote or published his 2nd book in the mid 80's. He wrote or published his last book in beginning of the 90's. From one book to another, you see a progression in depth, complexity, and breadth of info. It becomes more broad, complex and accurate, because Bob was growing spiritually from one book to another.
Now, there are various sources which say that as we move closer to the Aquarian Age, and to certain cycles like the Galactic-Winter Solstice Alignment, which we are now in, the collective vibrations of the ELS are being raised more and more. More and more people can understand, accept, and handle greater depth and detail of info.
I have a feeling that if Bob was here today, he would say that even his mind was stretched at times by Rosiland's guidance. For awhile he looked avidly towards these sessions because of their enlightening nature. He writes in his 1st biography about this, and that it was very addictive for him and something he always had to consciously pull away from.
For even him, and for people then, it was not so simple and easy to grasp. There are plenty of times when Bob got "aha" info from Rosiland's source.
That's why he called Rosie's main guide, "Ah So".
You, i, and all of humanity and the Earth herself, have the benefit of living closer to those important cycle markers, and enjoying an overall faster vibrating Earth dimension. Guidance is now more willing and can now more easily communicate certain concepts that they may not have 30 years ago.
Relativity Vince. Just as Cayce's guidance didn't communicate about a Greater Self existing outside of time, which has within it many innate aspects, which some get turned into free willed personalities which live physical lives. But, really this is happening from a "no" or rather all time state. About 40 years later, other sources felt it was time to speak more clearly and accurately about such concepts, as both Monroe and Rosilands info talks about.
So what is your point? No doubt there are sources today which speak with greater complexity than Rosiland's guidance did, but you have to allow for a natural progression here. There are also, besides the general vibe of the Earth being faster vibrating, more individuals who are living in a much faster vibratory state then there was say 20, 40, or 80 years ago.
Quote:In my opinion. (Which is based on personal experienced and extensive research into the subject, of course.)
Imo, i believe you are too quick to try to defend the Seth material, and lets not be coy, one of the reasons why you started this thread was in part to defend Seth in a round about way.
I also question your discernment and degree of intuition when you express strong interest in sources like the Matrix 5 material, when to more seasoned explorers, these automatically ring the 'rather off bells', even without needing to read a lot of the material itself.
I had a similar feeling with Seth, even before i read about the whole Jesus crucifixion issue. I'm a deeply intuitive person who feels fairly clearly, what outer sources are mostly about or not. I don't doubt there is truth in Roberts work, just as i don't doubt there is truth in the Matrix 5 material, but neither seems all that helpful to me and
funny enough, both degrade the life and example of Yeshua. If Roberts work was so helpful to you in faciliating a faster vibratory level, would you have been as interested in buying the Matrix 5 books as you seemed to be? Can you not just intuitively feel what these or other sources are about? Seems Roberts work hasn't been as helpful to you as you think, but seems to have kept you more in an intellectual place (btw, the Matrix 5 books likewise has a very intellectual/mental polarization to it).
I see quite a lot of potential in you, and have said some things about you that i would not say about too many other people in these times. Yet, you still have some limiting beliefs and sources to let go of, if you want to more fully realize that potential. You are letting outside sources have too much influence on your beliefs.
So yes, you can find errors in pretty much any channeled or psychically derived source, heck i strongly disagree with Bruce about his views on vegetarianism, BUT there is relativity here, meaning there are degrees of accuracy and offness. My guidance leads me to the sources which have the least offness and inaccuracy, and they do a good job of same, because i have spent a long time in this life, and in others lives of learning to listen.
Comparing Seths possible (to you) skewing about a physical world event, to a possible skewing (to both of us) of Rosilands guidance re: the etheric state and all that jazz is like comparing apples and oranges.
Not one source that i've come upon, and got a lot of PUL and highly aware/expanded vibes from, ever speaks derogatorily of Yeshua and his life or example (and they all affirm his birth, crucifixion, and resurrection), yet i've found it is common in ignorant or purposely misleading sources. You know how many Gurus have claimed to be Jesus reincarnated, but that they were beyond Jesus? Or other Gurus say false things about him and his life?
There seems to be both a conscious and unconscious agenda against Yeshua and his example.
If true, a good question to ask is why? Maybe because he represents the most intune and powerful example of true spiritual livingness publicly known about, and some sources dislike or disagree with him based on like attracts like i.e. they are far from being in resonation with such a pure energy OR in some cases there are forces out there that like a stuck humanity? His example, when put into perspective, is extremely inspiring, and for me personally the most inspiring example that i've yet come across though i rather like and inspired by those like Yeshua's mother, Cayce, Moen, Monroe, Dr. King, Gandhi, my Mom, etc.