Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print
Jesus (Read 51553 times)
Beau
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1176
Greenville SC
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #120 - Feb 6th, 2009 at 12:56am
 
If posting this offends I apologize in advance it's just where I am and it was inspired by this thread.

Everyone But You

I'll let you have your Jesus, if you let me have mine
Cause I know my opinion to you ain't worth a dime
I get so tired of arguing all ways back and forth
You don't have to see it my way to pass this earthly course

I'll let you have your Jesus, if you let me have mine
I know when these words fly between us we're losing track of time
He created something special in those three years
Made an impression on me and taught me not to fear

Things are pretty simple in the eyes I see thru
I'll stick to my plan if it's alright with you
You ask me if I'm saved, then you ask me if I'm true
I'll tell you right now darlin I've been saved from everyone but you

Look into my eyes baby and know that I'm for real
I've got real eyes to realize it's exactly how I feel
Things don't happen in time and space unless you got the bug
While we're down here working it out it's like getting hit by a truck

I'll let you have your Jesus, if you let me have mine
Okay, we don't have to talk about it, lets just unwind
The truth here is spherical that much I know for sure
We can't see eye to eye when each takes a stand that must endure

My real eyes focus inside my head if I can be so blunt
I don't need science or religion for this particular scavenger hunt
I go on what rings true from the inside out in my mind
I've had some of these lessons before and I just can't waste the time

Back to top
 

All the world's a stage...whose stage?--that is the question!...or is it the answer...Who is on first.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Berserk2
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 844
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #121 - Feb 6th, 2009 at 3:37am
 
Perhaps I should try to elaborate on the depths of my feelings and skepticism about retrievals.  In my mind, no one longs more intensely than I for retrievals to be genuine.  At its core, early Christianity originally implied this philosophy: None of us ultimately "make it" unless we all make it.  To love you means that I consider your success my success and your failure my failure.  I cannot feel fulfillment in my anticipated postmortem bliss if any who have crossed my path do not share this bliss in their own way.  Personal ego must give way to a sense that I am "everyman"--no better and no worse.  I must look at life from the perspective that I could have loved others more wisely or intensely to motivate them to find a path to bliss that works for them.  Of course, this idealism is tempered by the harsh reality of my limitations in both understanding and spiritual capability.  But the prospect of retrievals creates the most noble dream imaginable-the draem -that love NEVER needs to give up on anyone.  

How then did these feelings affect my months of elation after "retrieving" Janet and my ultimate realization that I had not done so?  I was a workaholic doctoral student when I dated her.  The pressures of my study load prevented me from discerning the warning signals that she was too chronically depressed for me to marry her.  She was not ultimately right for me, and so, we broke up on the brink of engagement.  I mishanded the termination of that relationship and can only say that sometimes you grow up at the expense of people you love.  

Naturally I was deeply concerned about her fate after she shot herself.  So imagine my relief when I retrieved her. In my passionate embrace she kept saying, "I'm OK, Sweetie, I'm OK! I'm OK!"  Her reassurance was great for my peace of mind and self-image.  But gradually I began to ask, "But was it great for Janet?  That's all that matters."  Then this sickening realization crept into my mind: we humans desperately need relief from sorrow and fear.  Our most important beliefs are unavoidably shaped by wishful thinking.  If I really did retrieve Janet, then she is OK.  But if I merely had a lucid retreival dream, then she may not be OK.  Since her wellbeing matters more than my feelings of relief, the pain of skepticism seemed the inevitable outcome of my love for Janet.  When I die, one of my top prirorites will be to seek her out and discover her true fate.  

It may sound odd, but I believe that some issues are too important to be believed without verification.  True love demands more than faith in mystical experiences; it requires the highest level of certitude possible that the best interests of our loved ones are served.  True, that certitude can be mystical rather than evidential.  Paradoxically, it is my very longing for tthe gneuineness of this site's retrievals that makes me so skeptical!  My insistence on verifcaiton is my way of loving Janet.

Don      
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 6th, 2009 at 3:26pm by Berserk2 »  
 
IP Logged
 
Beau
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1176
Greenville SC
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #122 - Feb 6th, 2009 at 6:26am
 
"The first shall be the last'. I absolutely believe that, Don. I see where you are coming from now. I just believe that reliance on the imagination is somewhat scorned by Big Religions Fore Fathers. And that without it one is lost to a belief system that is untended by the Christ Light.

And I understand wanting proof, but to me in this case the proof is personal to the experiencer because true reality still comes from perception and when in C1 we can't completely share that. I believe that dreams are as real as experience here just different. How much of your waking life are you aware of while within your dreams that aren't lucid? It is another expression of Consciousness, dreams are. But why should that make it any less real, just because you can't appear to share it with another as you can your experience in C1. You can't explain your waking life very well in your dreams either...at least I can't. So just some thoughts. I don't know about retrievals really. I've only done one and it didn't go swimmingly or anything like that, but it seemed real and I wasn't making it up that I'm aware of, but when I got back to C1 I couldn't tell really. Because of my lack of experience I have wondered if Retrievals are necessary or if they are busy work...I'm still not sure, but many at this site seem to take them very seriously and I respect that.
Back to top
 

All the world's a stage...whose stage?--that is the question!...or is it the answer...Who is on first.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #123 - Feb 6th, 2009 at 1:36pm
 
Thank you Beau and Hawkeye.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
identcat
Senior Member
****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 454
New Hampshire
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #124 - Feb 6th, 2009 at 2:46pm
 
Don--- contact me. I may have some information for you from Janet. I would like to keep it personal. --Carol Ann

identcat@pctnh.net
Back to top
 

The three things you can never take back:
The spoken word.
The unkind thought.
The misused hour.
identcat  
IP Logged
 
Justin
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #125 - Feb 6th, 2009 at 3:18pm
 
 Don, regarding your imaginary Retrieval with Janet, you bring up some good points, but it seems you are projecting your personal experiences too much into a more universal sense.  

  As you mentioned, there was a lot of deep emotional attachment going on with you in relation to Janet.  

 Yet, most people here who perform retrievals, of are retrieving strangers with whom they have no deep, emotional connection with, hence there is less intrinsic reason for unconsciously making it up or what not.  Yes, there may be other unconscious attachments involved, and i likewise have gotten the sense that not all retrievals reported here were genuine spiritual experiences, but there are plenty that i've sensed were.  

 It seems you need to get out of your left brain side a bit, and learn more to feel what's going on.  Yes, i know you have had some powerful mystical experiences, i'm not doubting that, but you strike me as someone who spends a lot of time being polarized overly much to the left brain side of things.   Your deep need for physically related proof of such spiritual matters speaks of that.  

 Kind of remind me of doubting Thomas as bit.  I don't remember Yeshua saying that one must constantly seek for proof in relation to Retrievals or any spiritual phenomena beyond the you shall know true and truly spiritual experiences by their fruits.  

 I haven't had a lot of verifications with retrievals.  Actually i haven't done all that many while conscious in the sense that Bruce Moen talks about.  I tend to have quite a lot of retrieval oriented dreams, and it may be that like Albert i'm involved in some more automatic, unconscious type retrieval work.   I have wondered about this, before i heard of Alberts descriptions.  

 While this is not a hard core verification (i.e. names, dates, etc later verified), this is one of my experiences which led me to believe that what happened after was a retrieval.

 I moved into a new place.  I started to feel feelings of depression, anger, etc. beyond my norm.  At one point while getting relaxed and on the verge of sleep i heard from a distinctly male sounding voice, "Get out!"  
  Putting 2 and 2 together, i realized that i probably was living in a place that a stuck person was attached to.   I didn't seek any verifcations, because i deeply believe in the reality of all this kind of stuff, but anyways i brought up the White Light within self, and projected that out to this person.  I told him that he wasn't physical anymore and that it was ok to move on, i told him to go to the light.  

 Well, didn't seem to work the first time during the first meditation.  I still vaguely felt him around and how i know that i can't explain.   I tried a couple more times and finally felt him leave.  

 Later on, through a neighbor, i found out that there was a family that lived in my place.  The man got cancer, became extremely depressed and angry, and part of of the reason was because he couldn't help contribute to the welfare of his family.   In his despair (and possibly physical pain), he shot himself in the head while in that house.  

 Again, probably not to be considered a hard core verification, but certainly suggestive when taken as a whole.  

 I also know that you are extremely skeptical of reincarnation, more so of that then retrievals, but i have what i consider to be a more hard core verification in that field.  For me personally, it was a very powerful experience with too many "coincidences" and synchronicities happening at the same time, that it pretty much voncinved me of the reality of reincarnation despite some off and on doubting re: it (and particularly to who i'm connected to).  

 Please keep in mind that i don't believe in the traditional model of reincarnation, but more similar to Bruce Moens Disk and Bob Monroes I/there concepts, wherein a greater self exists out of time/space and projects aspects of itself in physical dimension for various reasons (from addiction, to wanting to balance karma, to curiosity, etc.).   Once a Disk gets stuck in relation to this physical world experience, it can be difficult to completely unattach from.  

 In a sense, beyond our left brain, material understanding, these incarnations and projections of the Greater self, happen simultaneously.  

 To be more specific, they happen simultaneously from the perspective of Pure Spirit.  To "levels" "below" that, there are various relative "times" involved.  Physical time is based on the belief and perception of pure separation.   Hence we even perceive a separation in time and oft categorize it as past, present, and future.  

 Since in reality (a reality of underlying Oneness) there is no separation between any energies and consciousnesses this is why physical, linear time could be called an "illusion".   Since each level "up" from and faster vibrating in nature than the physical, there is less and less belief and experience of separation, then linear time perception changes accordingly.  

It's interesting to note that when one is focussed in the physical a lot, there is a perception of a lot of movement and constant change.  

 The few times in deep meditation wherein i consciously perceived the pure White Light and total, all encompassing Love and Divinity, it felt like i was experiencing all of eternity in one moment, but in a way that it felt completely STILL.  

 Yet, vibrational wise, the physical is the slowest vibrating dimension, and pure Spirit is the fastest vibrating Consciousness.

 Strange how they flip flop in perception like that--a clue to the mirror like reflection and ultimate non reality of the physical perhaps?  Anyways, hope to see you on my "reincanration thread" wherein i talk about what to me seemed to be a pretty convincing verification.  
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Jesus
Reply #126 - Feb 6th, 2009 at 3:42pm
 
Just  set the record straight, Doubting Thomas refers to Thomas, who doubted Christ's resurrection without seeing the wounds:

"The term is based on the Biblical account of Thomas the Apostle, who doubted the resurrection of Jesus and demanded to feel Jesus' wounds before being convinced (John 20:24-29), although the Bible does not mention if actual contact took place. After seeing Jesus alive and being offered the opportunity to touch his wounds — according to the author of the Gospel of John — Thomas professed his faith in Jesus; on this account he is also called Thomas the Believer.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #127 - Feb 6th, 2009 at 4:09pm
 
You're right Matthew. I remembered this, and hoped to rush to the forum and correct my post, but you beat me to it. Thanks. Sad

DocM wrote on Feb 6th, 2009 at 3:42pm:
Just  set the record straight, Doubting Thomas refers to Thomas, who doubted Christ's resurrection without seeing the wounds:

"The term is based on the Biblical account of Thomas the Apostle, who doubted the resurrection of Jesus and demanded to feel Jesus' wounds before being convinced (John 20:24-29), although the Bible does not mention if actual contact took place. After seeing Jesus alive and being offered the opportunity to touch his wounds — according to the author of the Gospel of John — Thomas professed his faith in Jesus; on this account he is also called Thomas the Believer.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 6th, 2009 at 8:29pm by recoverer »  
 
IP Logged
 
ultra
Full Member
***
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 119
Re: Jesus....via Krishna?? Another view...
Reply #128 - Feb 8th, 2009 at 3:29pm
 
Hello all!

Haven't been here in a few months. I hope everyone is well.  
For those who are interested, I would like to make a contribution to the subject in question, that of Jesus Christ, by way of some links to material I feel is relevant to the subject and may be useful to some here in that regard, along with some introductory remarks.

The below links are excerpts from
"Essays on the Gita" by Sri Aurobindo.
As I often preface when recommending Sri Aurobindo, he is not an easy read for most, but at the same time his writings can be well worth the required effort for the depth and clarity of knowledge that is available. In his discussion on each chapter, Sri Aurobindo explains both the surface meanings, and the deeper import of the original passages in a way that can be useful not only as commentary, but in its own right as instruction/illumination for the contemporary seeker. Also, aspirants who have not read the Gita should not be discouraged from investigating this material by Sri Aurobindo, as it may even serve as a cogent and authoritative introduction to a text that many Westerners (and Christ followers) sometimes avoid as being too exotic or even irrelevant to their seeking. However, as the below may ultimately demonstrate, there may be much more available than mere surface appearance suggests.

For those not familiar with the Gita (or Bhagavad Gita - Celestial Song), it is widely considered one of the greatest works of world spiritual literature. It is an instruction containing the colloquy between Godhead as personified by Krishna, and the world disciple or aspiring Humanity as personified by Arjuna. Basically, each chapter is a progressively built teaching as to the nature of reality, the intrinsic problems without, and different solutions within. (note to AK members: in some places there are occasional instructions on the process of death/dying). The Gita itself is contained within and a very small part of the much larger Mahabharata epic, but that is literally (npi) another story entirely....

Getting to the original intent in providing the links are the specific chapters below dealing with the appearance of an Avatar or "Incarnation" on Earth - - the what, why, how, when, etc., which Krishna reveals to Arjuna in the Gita.  
Although the Gita is ostensibly about the specific appearance of Krishna as He was the Avatar of the era in which the Gita takes place, so too the Christ was a manifestation of the same phenomenon in a later time, also embodying the universal Truth, and indeed Sri Aurobindo mentions the Christ/Christianity illustratively in his commentary at least two dozen times in the 3 chapters linked below regarding such divine manifestations. The commentary therefore has the potential to provide a deeper understanding of the concepts, meanings, significance, the Reality of Jesus Christ as an Avatar
in this exposition that, to the open minded reader may be quite unique, inspiring, and expanding on currently held beliefs, Christian or not. I can honestly say that this has been abundantly true in my case. Included in these essays are also found discussions on various common conceptions, misconceptions and refutations of the premise and reality of avatarhood, since as is characteristic with Aurobindo's writings, he is is generously thorough in managing to quite often interpose "the reader's" own questions and views as a basis for explanation and comment.

Of course, beyond these few chapters which here are out of the contextual flow of both the "Gita" itself, and "Essays On...", I would also recommend the entire texts of both/either as very possibly enlightening and rewarding, certainly moreso together, but the material referenced below will give a good introduction nevertheless.

If anyone would be interested in pursuing this further and wants a recommendation on (imo) a good version of the Bhagavad Gita - beware, there are many, many bad versions, some quite atrociously and unintelligently translated and therefore a waste of time for the contemporary Western seeker - I have posted my recommendation here:
http://afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1234119926/0#0
in the "Religions" forum as a good-will gesture vs here in this thread, as I feel that even this post alone, relevant as it is, perhaps is pushing the limits of some members' tolerance in a thread that is supposed to be all about Jesus.  Wink  Such being the case for those most comfortably ensconced the "Judeo-Christian Ghetto" (as one Padre PazzoFurioso2 might put it), references to such "heretical texts" may be considered inflammatory.  Wink  Roll Eyes  Be that as it may.....


...as always, I hope this may be enlightening and helpful.

- u


Selected excerpts followed by the links.


excerpt from Sri Aurobindo, Essays on the Gita, Chapter 15, The Possibility and Purpose of Avatarhood Quote:
For to the modern mind Avatarhood is one of the most difficult to accept or to understand of all the ideas that are streaming in from the East upon the rationalised human consciousness. It is apt to take it at the best for a mere figure for some high manifestation of human power, character, genius, great work done for the world or in the world, and at the worst to regard it as a superstition, – to the heathen a foolishness and to the Greeks a stumbling-block. The materialist, necessarily, cannot even look at it, since he does not believe in God; to the rationalist or the Deist it is a folly and a thing of derision; to the thoroughgoing dualist who sees an unbridgeable gulf between the human and the divine nature, it sounds like a blasphemy. The rationalist objects that if God exists, he is extracosmic or supracosmic and does not intervene in the affairs of the world, but allows them to be governed by a fixed machinery of law, – he is, in fact, a sort of far-off constitutional monarch or spiritual King Log, at the best an indifferent inactive Spirit behind the activity of Nature, like some generalised or abstract witness Purusha of the Sankhyas; he is pure Spirit and cannot put on a body, infinite and cannot be finite as the human being is finite, the ever unborn creator and cannot be the creature born into the world, – these things are impossible even to his absolute omnipotence. To these objections the thoroughgoing dualist would add that God is in his person, his role and his nature different and separate from man; the perfect cannot put on human imperfection; the unborn personal God cannot be born as a human personality; the Ruler of the worlds cannot be limited in a nature-bound human action and in a perishable human body. These objections, so formidable at first sight to the reason, seem to have been present to the mind of the Teacher in the Gita when he says that although the Divine is unborn, imperishable in his self-existence, the Lord of all beings, yet he assumes birth by a supreme resort to the action of his Nature and by force of his self-Maya; that he whom the deluded despise because lodged in a human body, is verily in his supreme being the Lord of all; that he is in the action of the divine consciousness the creator of the fourfold Law and the doer of the works of the world and at the same time in the silence of the divine consciousness the impartial witness of the works of his own Nature, – for he is always, beyond both the silence and the action, the supreme Purushottama. And the Gita is able to meet all these oppositions and to reconcile all these contraries because...



excerpt from Sri Aurobindo, Essays on the Gita, chapter 16, The Process of Avatarhood
Quote:
...that the Lord of all existence thus takes upon himself the human birth.
This doctrine is a hard saying, a difficult thing for the human reason to accept; and for an obvious reason, because of the evident humanity of the Avatar. The Avatar is always a dual phenomenon of divinity and humanity; the Divine takes upon himself the human nature with all its outward limitations and makes them the circumstances, means, instruments of the divine consciousness and the divine power, a vessel of the divine birth and the divine works. But so surely it must be, since otherwise the object of the Avatar's descent is not fulfilled; for that object is precisely to show that the human birth with all its limitations can be made such a means and instrument of the divine birth and divine works, precisely to show that the human type of consciousness can be compatible with the divine essence of consciousness made manifest, can be converted into its vessel, drawn into nearer conformity with it by a change of its mould and a heightening of its powers of light and love and strength and purity; and to show  also how it can be done. If the Avatar were to act in an entirely supernormal fashion, this object would not be fulfilled. A merely supernormal or miraculous Avatar would be a meaningless absurdity; not that there need be an entire absence of the use of supernormal powers such as Christ's so-called miracles of healing, for the use of supernormal powers is quite a possibility of human nature; but there need not be that at all, nor in any case is it the root of the matter, nor would it at all do if the life were nothing else but a display of supernormal fireworks. The Avatar does not come as a thaumaturgic magician, but as the divine leader of humanity and the exemplar of a divine humanity. Even human sorrow and physical suffering he must assume and use so as to show, first, how that suffering may be a means of redemption, – as did Christ, – secondly, to show how, having been assumed by the divine soul in the human nature, it can also be overcome in the same nature, – as did Buddha. The rationalist who would have cried to Christ, “If thou art the Son of God, come down from the cross,” or points out sagely that the Avatar was not divine because he died and died too by disease, – as a dog dieth, – knows not what he is saying: for he has missed the root of the whole matter. Even, the Avatar of sorrow and suffering must come before there can be the Avatar of divine joy; the human limitation must be assumed in order to show how it can be overcome; and the way and the extent of the overcoming, whether internal only or external also, depends upon the stage of the human advance; it must not be done by a non-human miracle.

The question then arises, and it is the sole real difficulty, for here the intellect falters and stumbles over its own limits, how is this human mind and body assumed? ....




The following links are the full chapters from which the above excerpts originate in "Essays on the Gita", by Sri Aurobindo

Chapter 15, The Possibility and Purpose of Avatarhood


http://sriaurobindoashram.info/Content.aspx?ContentURL=_staticcontent%5csriaurob...

Chapter 16,  The Process of Avatarhood


http://www.sriaurobindoashram.org.in/Content.aspx?ContentURL=/_staticcontent/sri...


Chapter 17,  The Divine Birth and Divine Works


http://www.sriaurobindoashram.org.in/Content.aspx?ContentURL=/_staticcontent/sri...


Back to top
 

"What the soul sees and has experienced, that it knows; the rest is appearance, prejudice and opinion."
   - Sri Aurobindo
 
IP Logged
 
ultra
Full Member
***
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 119
Re: Jesus
Reply #129 - Feb 11th, 2009 at 3:09am
 
Hi,

I've been informed that the links provided in the above post may not/do not work/only work sometimes, and i have confirmed this. I apologize for any inconvenience or frustration as I tested these after making the post and they all did work at the time.  Undecided  Perhaps it is a site/server issue. At any rate, I  have only now had time to try to remedy this, and since I evidently cannot edit the above post...

...Here is the link below for the entire table of contents for the book sited. You will have to find the three chapters listed above by title in the table. If this link does not work, try doing a site search or some other navigation to get the chapters in question.
Good luck...

Best regards,

- u

Table of contents for "Essays on the Gita"
http://www.sriaurobindoashram.org.in/Contents.aspx?ParentCategoryName=%5c_static...
Back to top
 

"What the soul sees and has experienced, that it knows; the rest is appearance, prejudice and opinion."
   - Sri Aurobindo
 
IP Logged
 
betson
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 3445
SE USA
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #130 - Feb 14th, 2009 at 4:54pm
 
Hi Beau,

Are your lyrics/ the poem set to music yet?
Cheesy Cheesy I hope they will be !!

Bets

Back to top
 

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Shakespeare
 
IP Logged
 
Beau
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1176
Greenville SC
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #131 - Feb 14th, 2009 at 5:35pm
 
When I get it done I'll post it on my myspace http://myspace.com/beau145 Thanks for asking Bets!!
Back to top
 

All the world's a stage...whose stage?--that is the question!...or is it the answer...Who is on first.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.