OK, I'll bite--
I don't accept their commentary. I still think it was probably a spirit because none of the points they make make 'sense' when you consider the characteristics of the subjects involved --
Any spirit who has been around awhile doesn't stop to interact with material objects because it knows it can't.
Most spirits show as dim light so it's not possible to say that because it has light it's NOT a ghost.
Most spirits do float, so again, it's not possible to say that because it floats it's NOT a ghost.
Any camera security situation that has cameras covering the same area is rather redundant and expensive. Do these folks really know if the other cameras were covering the same area? Perhaps each camera has a different area to cover and that's why the others didn't see it.
In addition which they don't mention, the light generally flows. Wouldn't an insect have an occasionally halting gait? My spiders pause to look around occasionally. The sense of movement I saw was much more spirit-like than insect-like.
Tell me I'm wrong and I'll
but do these folks even visit the site or do they sit around drinking coffee and conjecturing? Did they even interview the people or did they take their info from a journalist's summary? They don't say in the article tht they investigated it.
What do you think, Lucy?
Bets