Is reality like television?

Let's say that our awareness = the viewer, the dancing electrons on our TV screen = the energy we use to create, and our minds = the program director.  Sometimes the program can come from an outer source, such as a higher level being. Sometimes it can come from us, depending upon how good we are at gaining control of the remote control. Often it is an interactive collaborative proces between ourselves, each other and higher level beings.

There is no one program we have to watch.  At a most basic level we are always the same viewer regardless of what we watch. For a while we might end up watching some lousy shows, until we figure out which channels have the good shows. For example, I hear the love channel is really good, except when it shows reruns of the love boat.

this is a good description. going a little further with it, we do select the channels. this is called focus.
each of us watches our favorite channel, to focus in on a secular interest, such as love boat, or
gilligans island or national geographic.

here, if my computer screen was analogous to a TV screen, we could say I am tuned into, focusing on what happens after death. each person who contributes adds part of the show.

while I'm focused on my channel station, I have no idea what that politics is being discussed just a knob switch over.

there are different ways of channelling. I'm one of the rare people who saw my boyfriend go to sleep while a disembodied voice used his vocal cords to tell me he was mortally wounded in the 16th century by a sword fight.

that's one way. nowadays channellers are springing up, and the physical vocal chords can be bypassed for the visiting entity, as well, we no longer have to be concerned about low entity beings, when we realize how we protect ourselves from that sort of thing.
many are reaching altered states these days, receiving various rotes, made to fit the think tank of the receiver, said receiver, our minds, are not unlike a radio station receiver set.

I can receive messages, in words, but they are strickly personal messages of helpfulness to me only.
It is not unreasonable to assume there are radio receivers out there who are able to go deeper than myself and receive ongoing transmissions of a higher vibrational field than the average person going here. I think it's about discernment of spirits.

mystics and psychics have reported visions of TV sets, used for past life viewing during their self assessment times.

love, alysia

We are in the television. We are also watching the television. We can affect the quality of the reception with our own "non-interference" -- in the form of love and acceptance of all things.

Recoverer

The belief in the entity Seth is much less important than the information which he presents for us.  Not all minds are completely open to all things, this is understandable.  Some things just dont resonate with everyone, and therefore I will not go into a debate on the authenticity of Seth as an entity.  

However, I will most deffinately stress the importance of the spreading of this information accumulated through these channelings, for they are of great importance to all members of the human race.  Since the introduction of the ideas presented by Seth, my mind and (therefore) all aspects of my life have expanded in an extremely positive manner.  Seth has introduced me to methods of discovering my true self and allowed me to remember my true capabilities, which I have learned are nearly infinite.  If every human accepted these ideas and put them into use in their every day lives, the world would be a meraculous place.  I know this for a fact because my world has become meraculous with the help of Seth's material, and if this information can change my life for the better, it can change others as well.  


PEACE!!!

I really like the television analogy and I think it is spot on.

I actually describe changing focus levels (in Monroe speak) like changing the channels on the television, and opening my senses to an alternate chennel.... the other channels are still broadcasting, but I am tuned in to a different channel, focused on it to the exclusion of the others.

While television programming is not at all reality, I do agree that reality is rather like television.

Thomas

Lucy:

I found the source that speaks about the publisher by chance one time, and had a hard time relocating it. Nevertheless, when I get a chance I'll try to find it again.  Regarding the video goof, I saw it on youtube.  I'm really busy at work these days and probably won't be able to find the publisher article today.

Whatever the case, in my case, it is important to remember that I've received a lot of spirit help from Christ.  Jane Roberts Seth say things about Christ that are false and irreverant.  For example, claiming that he wasn't crucified. Spiritual experiences and messages have told me differently.  Also, Jane Roberts Seth speak of just three of Jesus's most famous verses, and reinterprets them so they lose spiritual meaning. For example, Jane Roberts Seth said that Jesus was just making a joke when he said to love your neighbor as yourself. I believe it is obvious that Jesus wasn't making joke when he said to love your neighbor as yourself.  If it isn't obvious, one could read portions of the gospels where he says this and see that he wasn't making a joke. A person would ask what the most important commandments were and he would include, "love your neighbor as yourself." If a person believes that the verses within the gospels can't be used in order to determine what Jesus actually said, it is important to realize that Jane Roberts Seth referred to these verses when making her/their false claims, and that she/he used various verses in order to try to deny that Jesus was crucified.

Personally, I don't care how many positive things Jane Roberts Seth has to say.  My feelings for Christ are far more important to me than anything I might gain by reading Seth. To me having love, reverence, respect and grattitude towards a light being such as Christ, is far more important than gaining a few pointers from Seth.

It is kind of ironic that Jane Roberts Seth chose to discredit Jesus' love your neighbor as yourself verse, because if anybody noticed, Jane Roberts Seth have very little to say about love. Especially when it comes to having love and reverence for that which is divine.

Some people might conclude I'm some sort of fundamentalist. My retort is, isn't it possible to have feelings of love, reverence, grattitude and humility towards that which is divine, without being a fundamentalist?

Lucy wrote on Jun 27^th, 2008 at 10:37am:

Thank you Juditha.

Quote: