Hi everyone,
Surfing along the net and also amoungst the board here, I was wondering why there are so many abstracts differing of opinions regarding the topic Afterlife, Life and religions.

Interesting indeed is, that we have so so many variables in beliefsystems anyway, its almost like being a child locked in at night in a Toys-R-Us, all alone. Whew Overwelming  

Same goes for "Afterlife" knowledge...lol.. I believe one of the readers and posters here said it so ironically funny a while back, that it really made me laugh, however kept me thinking: "Everytime I read the words "afterlife knowledge" I shiver" or something like that was said.

Afterlife or Life - is discribed as being a "holographic disk",  others refer to it as being a "matrix", then theres a word called "realms" which can be found, and "Focus levels". I`ve heard the phrase "planes" used. Whileas other people say that "we are not really alive at all, but merely a form of energy flowing, just waiting to be told that we are all already deceased"... (but isnt that... being a flow of energy being alive, I asked myself?)

Theres just about as many "discriptive references" to formate a thought pattern of exsistense as there is "as many different religions" to choose from out there.

So will the topic "afterlife" remain just as unrevealing to us as the topic "religion" has been since the beginning of time?

Hugs,
Nanner

Hi Nanner-
Seems like we all use different words to express something that doesn't naturally occur in everyday life. Religion is another good example.

Howsabout expressing it all in some kind of set theoretical abstract manner - that we have a descending hierarchy of projections from a meta-set that divide into subspaces, carrying conditional Lie congruence?

I think "disk" and "matrix" probably communicate better. But that's just an opinion. In my work I use the technical approach, but then I have to draw a lot of logical diagrams and work out the symbolic explanations. Being lazy, "disk" and "matrix" are also easier.

dave