Hi Alan,
community members,

Alan,
I appreciate your interests and concerns as these are certainly issues that any truth seeker and/or God lover (depending on one's temperament) would naturally be interested in.
I've provided a link to a book that was written by a source I reference quite often - perhaps not as much as Justin uses Cayce and not as much as Don uses the Bible, but I wish to ask for some latitude in this regard. You see, as has been pointed out to me much in the same way that you yourself have been deemed way too 'post-y', therefore no time to '...s...a...v...o...r...' -- evidently I have made a comparative shamefully too few posts according to a VIP here (I ask you - is there no way to please everyone?), and as such I have not been able to accumulate the sheer mind-numbing quantity of repeated singular, identical references that ultimately must confer spiritual gravitas and numerically based pride.
Pursuant to that dismal failure on my part, I also need to qualify the self-evident (at least I thought so before, is this a deja vue?) notion that people use whatever sources have meaning and authority for them. This is a personal and subjective evaluation. It doesn't necessarily mean they are 'promoting', whether themselves, someone or something else. I like to quote or refer to sources I feel have authenticity for me, and I feel that in my case, it is often better to let a spiritual Master who I feel is God-realized do the talking - especially when there is an accurate, unmediated, contemporary record - regarding subjects that for me at least, remain highly subjective and speculative no matter how adamantly I might posture those speculations (allow me to make the analogy of 4 year olds vehemently arguing over what sex or neurosurgery must be like). Perhaps this is my naivete. I am therefore begging forgiveness from the forum's representative inner circle of spritual tough love and intellectual manliness! For the philosophically inclined I'll be the first to point out that even my evaluation of these sources as God-realized is subjective and speculative. Ok people?
So I offer this book, which in a rather striking way directly addresses point for point, all of the issues in your above list Alan.
Apparently, the author said that this particular book, one of his own favorites would be one that would be read far into the future. It is a personal favorite of mine as well. It is interesting to note that with the publishing date of 1973, it makes this perhaps the first contemporary 'conversations with God' type book.
I hope that people find something of value in it.
"My Lord's Secrets Revealed"
http://www.srichinmoylibrary.com/books/0008/Best regards,

- u