Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Self, soul and immortality.... (Read 12172 times)
vajra
Ex Member


Self, soul and immortality....
Jan 4th, 2008 at 9:40pm
 
My parents are in their 90s and by definition approaching the end of the road. I've meanwhile had a few brushes with death, most recently through illness. Recoverer has meanwhile been posting about soul.

I've been thinking about some of the differing views on the above, and would appreciate hearing what you guys have to say on the subject of survival. And what experience you have to back it up.

Buddhism in essence seems to say that it's higher primordial/dharmakaya/absolute mind/awareness that's immortal, and that the characteristics that go to make up what we'd regard as a personal self are subject to ongoing change, have no permanence and transmit via karma - in the form of both mind tendencies, biology and evolving life situation.

Realisation its said puts one beyond the influence of karma, but also allows one to if required out of e.g. compassion for other humans to reincarnate (as multiple reincarnations/emanations at once if required) from the dharmakaya or absolute reality into a body in the world complete with at least certain attributes from previous lives. Which implies that this reality is far from being just an amporphous timeless blur.

Such an incarnation still has to learn to live in this reality and achieve realisation as we all do, although they are said to quickly achieve both. (there's a lot written about the amazing behaviours of reincarnations which can show remarkable knowledge and powers as children) I've no information beyond the above which in essence summarises what's generally taught as undergone by Tibetan Rinpoches or reincarnated teachers.

The bit i've no idea what the teaching on is whether or not the unrealised can also store in and transmit anything via the dharmakaya/higher mind/the absolute. We all embody primordial awareness however. Do you know anything about this Dave, Blink, anybody?

This is quite an important point because those positing an immortal soul suggest a range of possibilities. At one extreme this soul will contain all personal characteristics, and allows for reincarnation of more or less an exact physical and mind replica of self - even if this is in the afterlife.

ACIM seems to be close to the Buddhist view, saying that essentially everything to do with ego is unreal and lost on death, but seeming to say (hope I have it right) that essential attributes are retained in the absolute.

Others such as the Urantia Book I seem to recall suggest that what we learn through love is replicated in the absolute and retained with our piece of God/soul, but that anything selfish dies with the body. i.e. a wholly egotistical person will essentially die or at least transmit nothing much beyond physical death.

We could say there are four elements in play (maybe you guys have a better definition?) - physical body, thinking brain-based intellect and learning, higher/absolute mind and learning/primordial awareness, and karma.

What do you guys figure happens to each of these in the case of the death of an unrealised person? Do we have any experience to verify it?

It might be best to first off suggest a different division if needed.

I can lead off from the Buddhist perspective:

Physical body and brain based intellect/learning are lost.
Karmic influences from past lives determine both birth and life circumstances and mind tendencies, but change continuously as they play out.
Its possible that certain attributes transmit via higher mind/awareness/dharmakaya/the absolute

My most relevant experience is a 100% clear separation of brain based intellect/thinking mind from awareness (can't be sure if it's the higher variety)  in meditation.

What do you guys think?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
blink
Ex Member


Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #1 - Jan 4th, 2008 at 10:12pm
 
Purely from my own perspective, I need no permanent body. In meditation experiences I have found that, in most instances, a body of any sort was unecessary. I cannot specify that another in some sort of "out of body" communication with me might perceive me to exist in a body or not, except in very brief instances in which a body seemed necessary for a personal experience, and, in that case, it was a "light/energy body" which was completely different.

I believe we can merge with infinite Source if that is our wish. That is my plan, whether I walk, ride or hitch....

...anything near it seems to require no thought whatsoever, only a sense of wonder and awe...

love, blink Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #2 - Jan 4th, 2008 at 11:10pm
 
based on just what we can call medium tendencies and obe tendencies also, I can stick to experiences as these seem to be what folks understand best.

my experiences are in what I call the astral areas or we could say focus levels 10 on up to 27 and once in awhile focus 33.

when I obed and dreamed I was dead was a time I was just beginning to do retrievals in conscious manner with phasing. there was a very real sense that I was "released". actually, in physical reality, I was freed from a role where I was realizing I was playing the role of my mother's daughter whom wished to win her love.
so you may see here that the daughter role died. In the roles we play in life a large belief system complete with attendant expectations, emotions, desires, is built into a role that we as spirit put on, and essentially, my mother and I had become room mates, in one swift moment when I realized she was incapable of being the mother I had expected her to be for 55 years. I released the need to attain her love and she presented to me her inability in this matter.

actually a burden was lifted from the heart to complete the karmic ties with her, and realize we are spirit which dons different roles life after life. so I was floating out there in the obe feeling rather free at first, noting I was no longer attached to whatever I had been attached to.

I had no memories at this level just a sense that was of the adventurous sort, in my essence which must always seek interaction with others and communication.

so perhaps we can say the memories are saved as the akashic records, and what changes in death is the roles we play, as we can come back and play different roles to one another. waking up was strange the next day as it felt like a new life was to begin and it really was all new.

also my grandmother, deceased retained her form and acted as guide to my mother, we both could see in our mind's eye her form living with us in the house. when I established contact with her, I asked her to change into her younger self for my sake to see. she did and was at once a young lovely woman. then I asked why she did not retain her youthful appearance? she replied mother had an image of her older self as she looked just before she died, and that mother would have difficulty remembering her youthful appearance.

so we are not talking about an enlightened, self realized family..just down home folks in my family, bunch of rowdies actually but admirable in a sort of rough way.

my sister died young, at 38 or so, and was astral bound for a number of years before I knew consciously to help her get on. she also took the form of a 13 yr old younger version of herself to appear to mother whom failed to recognize it was her. my sister haunted the family a bit, until she could contact me and settle our differences via a conversation. then she went to live on I think focus 27, she had a house, I saw it, she had a new beau, it could have been focus 23 though. but it was definetely a rise for her from the lower astral to something better.

and so I'm not answering the question you brought up very well Ian.

I have heard from another explorer that his parents he has contacted whom passed over and he said they were not as emotional as they had been in life but they were still together and were pleasant to him.

I think perhaps in relationship to Buddism, we can say where we have been defines to some degree where we are headed, in that our experiences produce an essence, which experience cannot be the whole of us, but we distill our characters from the many experiences and roles we play life after life.
I'm reading of root races at present. apparently the 6th and 7th root race has begun its work of evolvement here, these are the ones who were born after 1900, these are the ones who can reach enlightenment the quicker.
some say there are nine root races, just depends which book.

a personal self versus an impersonal self, I don't know what that means. you'll have to explain it better Ian.
Basically PUL runs the universe and it adds to a soul, but does not take anything away from a soul, so I don't see loss in the term, personal loss of self. in enlightenment an expansion of awareness occurs instead of a contraction of awareness and I would think on the other side, a continuation of this expansion process occurs, what is started on this side.
there are a loss of anger, hatred, and lust upon death in a process where the emotional body, as these are building blocks, these are real material of finer nature, does disintegrate gradually within the lower astral field, which I am sure my sister was trying to burn off all her bitterness over dying young and she finally did. also while she did this sloughing off of her hurt and anger, she took care of abused horses, and was burning off some karmic thing doing that, as she had a great love of horses.

while the self is being cleansed, it feels like part of you is dying, because we get so attached to the idea that an emotion, or a role is us. so it wants to live. if it's no longer useful and slows us down, it has to break away from us, and I think the Buddhist are talking about the negatives are dying, but whatever is a fruit of the soul endures along with the sense "I am."

what I think this is, is a person begins to realize they own their soul, but before claiming ownership they may go thru very difficult trials.



Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
george stone
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 857
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #3 - Jan 4th, 2008 at 11:15pm
 
I think that our future lives are preordaned,and that after death we will know where we will be going in our next live,why i think this is so,is that in one of my dreams,I was coming along a road to where my mother to be was.I saw some people who i later knew.My mother to be was with child,and i said her icome and that was all i remembered.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #4 - Jan 4th, 2008 at 11:33pm
 
thanks George. u reminded me, I came in contact with my twins souls 7 years before they were born to me. I recognized them when they were born. they used to pull on my legs to get me to come out of body.
I also recognized my husband to be a year before we were married by a stream of light in the eyes, and the room sounds disappeared for a second and I knew we would be together.

Monroe met his future self also in his books. he met a past self with the name Munroe, spelled with a u instead of an o...so there is something to predestination.
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
dave_a_mbs
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 1655
central california
Gender: male
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #5 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 12:32am
 
I'm not sure what a "realized" or for that matter, "un-realized", person would be. If there is some cosmic Master-Switch that gets turned on eventually, I haven't heard anything about it.

There is a level that I've heard called "Liberation", which is attainment of "satchitananda" - but that too has gradations, dependeng on whether we are talking about some absolute state, or simply that we have made adequate peace with our world.

My personal opinion is that all this stuff gets so difficult because we want it to be what we expect, based on visual dominance.

By juxtaposition of the proper qualities of things, it is possible to give the appearance of a material world. (That's because everything we do is moderated and filtered through a sensory system so that we have no direct access.) Aside from that, there is nothing to suggest that the world has any kind of order. For all we can show, the world may be a collection of all the facts in the universe, all tossed into a single place. We simply pull out whatever we feel useful. What is fast and easy we identify as "near", and that which responds slowly we term "far" and so on.

On that basis my opinion is that we have one big collective intelligence that only has limited access to itself as a collectivity, but which has all manner of individual awarenesses. Maybe we're all living in God's daydream.

dave
Back to top
 

life is too short to drink sour wine
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Alan McDougall
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2104
South Africa
Gender: male
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #6 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 5:15am
 
Hi,

We retain the same awareness, consciousness and continue as a unique being forever. We are not absorbed into the universal mind, source call it what you may. The Buddha concept of loss of self is no different to eternal death or elimination of the spirit and soul and is a horrifying concept from which that all people flee.  I did not neon to sit in a cave for twenty years contemplating about an existence and place that I will only know for sure is real when I die. I could sit and meditate forever on the city of Istanbul, but until I have been there myself will never know if my contemplations and visions about this remote place from my perspective were true or not.

I know I dont have to muse, hypostatize, postulate about he continuation of my self and my beloved ones that have passed over before me. I have died , retained my  knew I has  still Alan over there and my parents greeted me in a way in my brief sojourn in a loving way that I could still recognize them. Maybe further into the death experience one change and evolves into a higher exalted state of spiritual energetic awareness Alan

Regards

Alan
Back to top
 

Blessings and Light

Alan McDougall
WWW <a href= <a href=  
IP Logged
 
Vee
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 473
Port Alberni, B.C.
Gender: female
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #7 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 8:49am
 
One of the problems I see with regard to trying to sort all this out is, as Monroe discovered, we create an afterlife experience based on expectations learned and practiced and repeated while here in the physical. This is a big part of his discoveries, to me., it is very important. It also meant that Bob Monroe's experiences and discoveries of the afterlife are subject to that also..in other words, he created his experiences as he discovered them, if you know what i am trying to say. So Buddhism is a real truth, because it creates that truth as it contemplates it, esp in group communal agreement over centuries. Also with Islam and Christianity or that person who is all alone dancing around a fire in some kind of religious ecstacy. There certainly is no doubt that humans created The Park, and the vast and incredible array of resources within it (as Moen's books discuss). And the experience of The Park completely denies these teachings of Buddhism about the ego, I think, or am I missing something? Yet I think buddhism offers a tremendous amount of wisdom of course. But so does The Park and everything to do with it. Like, my brother there, finding that he is still addicted to alcohol and can't get any kick from it there, has tried growing marijuana in an effort to handle his addiction. It might work, it might not, I haven't communicated with him since that day...last time I went calling he was away somewhere, his house was empty. I am trying to learn to stay cool and calm and spend a longer time there, instead of popping in and out and fleeing back to my body so quickly. We have to say all these belief and experience systems have their truth, because the human race has created them. Bearing in mind, if we also have experienced lives in other planetary systems over the centuries and aeons, then we also have helped to create afterlife scenarios to do with life forms which we, in this human form right now, cannot remember or connect with. It seems we cannot help creatiing, both in this physical vibration and in the spiritual realm, it seems like creation is constant and ongoing and that includes belief systems, including Monroe's belief system. We just can't help doing this. What is real? Maybe the only reality is the dreamer doing the dreaming and creating, somewhere.  Vee
Back to top
 

I LIVE IN THE MIND OF SUMMERTIME, MY INNER SKY IS BLUE AND FULL OF LIGHT.THE RICH, JUICY FRUITS OF MY LIFE ARE RIPE UPON MY INNER SUMMERTIME TREES.I AM THE MIND OF GOD.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Old Dood
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 448
Lansing
Gender: male
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #8 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 12:41pm
 
Good post Vee.
May I suggest something with out sounding 'lordy'?
Could you break up your posts a bit into paragraphs? It is hard for me to read them and I like to read your thoughts.
Far be it from me that I am some expert on grammar. My kids and Mrs Dood love to point that out to me. Smiley

As for on topic: What I would like to know is how did the 'Centers' in focus 27 look lets say 100 years ago. 200 years...500 years?

Did they have high tech looking screens then?  I would not 'think' so.  
Was everything on a Scoll back in Roman days for example?
Has anyone that has traveled there asked about this?
Like the 'Re-Entry Tower'.  Was it a tower back then or some kind of wooden machinery?
A 'mill' that squeezed us down to a curl?

I always think of weird stuff like this.  I assume since we are a TV generation things would look like what we are use too.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
vajra
Ex Member


Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #9 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 1:45pm
 
Thank you very much guys for putting your thoughts and very personal experience in writing. You're very generous.  Smiley Smiley Smiley

I'm reluctant to plunge into discussion of specifics again as the objective was not to somehow reconcile it all into a single view.

Reading through your replies what's striking is the way some fairly common elements of experience can be positioned within quite different conceptual frameworks, and be related to quite differently. And  that's before we talk of what we don't consciously perceive.

What it seems to say to me is that (a) it's very much an evolving picture, a voyage of discovery for all of us, and (b) that while we each may have our own take this probably means that getting too firmly attached to any particular belief system seems likely to be the high road to nowhere much in particular. That openness and a basically loving and accepting orientation are so important.

Even experience is potentially quite a slippery fish in that as V says what we get seems so much to reflect what we believe - a double edged sword in that belief potentially determines experience, but can also block access to needed experience. Dood backs the highly relative nature of experience with his point about perceived afterlife realities being seemingly era dependent.

Dave suggests that our viewpoint is heavily partial - in terms of what we think we want to believe, the way our sensory apparatus may well only draw from some primordial soup of reality what we want to perceive, and the limits of our space time based dualistic system of logic. V's point about our not recalling past existences creates even more uncertainty. And as George says so much of it seems to be predestined, or at least heading for a known outcome.

Yet Alysia's and all of your experience underlines the shared view that there's little accidental that seems to happen throughout - that we can in at least some limited way make sense of what's going down.

I'd add one more perspective - i have to think that there are processes that play out mostly beyond those relatively conventional realms we can access that determine for example the direction the afterlife experience takes us over which we have little or no control, at least not until such time as we reach a level of consciousness where we can transcend them.

Perhaps  there's facets of simultaneous viewpoint dependent truth in all that's been expressed - for example self can from one view be an aggregate composed of dynamically juxtaposed things of which only the underlying fabric has permanence, and from another a wholly solid and indivisible independent self conscious entity. (the 'personal' self i mentioned before)

Perhaps this is why some trust that God or higher mind has it under control, and that Grace/basic goodness are in play is important too.....
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 5th, 2008 at 4:04pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
Vee
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 473
Port Alberni, B.C.
Gender: female
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #10 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 4:36pm
 
Thanks for your thoughts and wonderful summary of it all, Vajra, you put it all so well. What is always so nice is to see that everybody is thinking about it all and I wonder if we will ever know the answer really, even when we leave our bods. And I will start paragraphing, Dood, thanks for mentioning that, I agree it's hard to read all in one big bunch. I've really enjoyed this thread and reading everybody's thoughts.
Back to top
 

I LIVE IN THE MIND OF SUMMERTIME, MY INNER SKY IS BLUE AND FULL OF LIGHT.THE RICH, JUICY FRUITS OF MY LIFE ARE RIPE UPON MY INNER SUMMERTIME TREES.I AM THE MIND OF GOD.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #11 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 5:10pm
 
Ian said: 'm reluctant to plunge into discussion of specifics again as the objective was not to somehow reconcile it all into a single view.
______
as I read the above I sensed what my own intention was to do the opposite of what Ian  asked for. I seek for the oneness, or the single view. I believe it's human nature to do that, to seek the commonality of humanity but at the same time time each individual perspective here strives after its own self expression within it's expectations.

when I first came here, my question was how to get a response to my posts. we are for the most part explorers of the retrieval thought system, those that stick around.
yesterday when I pondered Ian's post I knew my perspective was from the experience I had with retrievals and contacts with those on the other side, and so at first I thought I should not respond at all because I had a feeling it would lead away from the Buddhist viewpoint, of which I still study, but I study with a comparative to other thought systems.

also while writing a post, I think its this way for most, fresh ideas start to pop up, even if far away from the main poster's thought system. I think thats where internal growth really happens, not so much from reading someone, but from your own response and sense of value in self expression.

what I get overall by looking at each person's post is a sense of wonder and awe at your combined thoughts. I seek for the echo of my own thoughts.

i see in my mind's eye we are in a huddle, like around a campfire swapping tales, whether they are lies or illusions, the mood of discovery takes on a hue.
In that sense I have no objective to look other than to keep an open mind about the benefits of another thought system, but not the negatives about it as the negative is instantly apparent..the positive is harder to find.
It is what it is.
for me, your thoughts send me deeper into my own self where I surprise myself that I found an answer but which answer is more of a feeling of PUL than mental. this touching we do of one another here causes a cleansing..we seem to do our laundry here. lol. I'm sorry. I often dream that I'm sitting on a toilet in public....this is awful! lol, not only that but a poster came and went and told me I was carrying a bedpan around! HAAAAAARRRR!!!!

with that deep confession as to what my ego is doing here I leave you all and may god save us all Grin
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #12 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 5:17pm
 
Vee, I'm glad u posted about how we create the afterlife, I'd been trying to say that, but you put it into perspective for me. Smiley  darn, I can almost see forever!!!
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
dave_a_mbs
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 1655
central california
Gender: male
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #13 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 5:46pm
 
I'd like to respond to Alan's remark that Buddhism implies a "death" of sorts of the individual. While this is absolutely true, in the sense of eliminating the notion of a permanent quasi-material soul made of some indestructible ectoplasmic material, it does not follow for the awareness of the individual.

In the abstract sense, we exist in what we do. The material ground over which we perform is transitory, but it seems solid because it takes a while to decay - something like 10E9 years for a proton, for example, to return to energy and become something else. We arise over that ground, and by virtue of the way it is shaped in hyperspace, we are implied by it. Then we take on an individual nature, based on activity that progressively removes us from our initial emergence. The goal of life, at least in this regard, seems to be establishment of the individual awareness as a self-sustained fact.

A quick and crude example of this kind of emergence is the formation of a "dust devil" in a prarie. (Mars gets these too - maybe the Martians are all ghosts!) The surrounding circumstances conpire to create a upwell of air, Coriolis forces set it into motion as a vortex, and once established, a vortex lives forever - until it runs out of food and dissipates.

Since we're not material, our soul won't run out of food and disspiate, so once we've set up our own feedback system, a vortical flow in which what we do is fed back to prompt what we do next, this is permanent. The body dies and the material world fades, but we continue.

Given that the cycling information flow (we're dealing with potential state space, not material phase space, this is just information in motion) is maintaining us perpetually, the next step is to merge that into the overall process of the universe which is the God-process, merger into Buddha-Mind, union with Brahman. To get there we have to stop holding onto lesser levels of existence. So we select merger into the next higher state by abandoning that which holds us into the lower states. This is just like abandoning my old tricycle for my present Toyota.

The part that doesn't survive is the series of attachments to the material artifacts used along the way. The part that does survive is a point of awareness that is self-directed, and which chooses to leave the everyday world in order to arrive at the next level up, the creative state. This is the part that has the NDE, or the OBE or which goes into the spirit world to rescue stuck souls. Not only does it not die, but it accumulates new information forever, so far as we can see, and as such, it is forever a part of God (or whatever word you prefer) - hence the "co-creator" notion.

I look at my wife asleep in bed next to me, glowing a soft greenish gold. In this world we've shared a lot of experiences. And I'd like to keep her with me - but in fact neither or us are truly defined by our life here. Our nature is somewhere beyond this life, and to the degree I seek to hold either of us to this place, that keeps us from becming aware of the far better place to which we go, and where we can be more intimate and loving. To look beyond this life seems to negate it, and yet it is nothing more than leaving the dock as we get into the boat that carries us to the other shore. All we need to remember is when arriving on the other shore, to get out of the boat.

dave
Back to top
 

life is too short to drink sour wine
WWW  
IP Logged
 
george stone
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 857
Re: Self, soul and immortality....
Reply #14 - Jan 5th, 2008 at 6:27pm
 
When we go to sleep at night,we have no idea of time.its like we do not excist.Than we wake up.Lots of people die in there sleep,and this makes me wounder.maybe we will go to the spirit world,and stay there for a 1000 years earthtime,after the 1000 years we might want to go back to earth for another life.then we wake up as a new born baby,and start another lifetime here.but we will forget about being in the spirit world.1000 years is a long time,but to us its the first time we have been here.right or wrong
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.