Hi Alysia, after reading some of your responses to Recoverer on this thread, i think you'd might benefit from reading something i just wrote recently on this site.
Here is a link and my reply is towards the end of the thread so far
http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1199049963/0#6 I really think you have some mistaken perceptions and beliefs about Albert. While i don't believe he is fully Source attuned, he is attaining to that awareness and far along the path, and he mostly wants to help people. In short, while he hasn't set himself up as one, i believe he is a real teacher as talked about in the above link. I'm sure he still has his misconceptions, misinterpretations, and even emotional hang ups, but to ascribe such generalized unloving intentions and motivations to him...well i just cannot agree at all.
Belief systems are strange things, they are double edged swords, which can help to cage people, or to help set them free. While the choice is always up to us, beliefs and belief systems are not neutral energies. All relative energies, affect all other relative energies. There are degrees of fast vibratory patterns and frequencies and slow vibrating energies in relation to both different teachings and different teachers.
Albert has been caught up in such limiting belief systems, and has largely freed himself from them, he would like to see others freed from same. This at times, may mean speaking out against such beliefs. What i would agree with you about, is that Albert could do less speaking out against, and more speaking on what's true, right, and freeing in nature. He does do the latter, but does seem to spend a bit of energy on the former as well. Maybe the proportion is not fully optimal, but again that doesn't mean that he has negative intentions and wishes to see people hurt.
Thankfully, unlike many other Guru's or teachings out there, he doesn't claim to be fully Source attuned and perfectly knowledgeable on stuff.
What i find interesting, in comparing say the N.T. to many Eastern teachings is this. Many Eastern teachings spend a lot of time and energy on concepts, ideas, etc. The N.T. on the other hand, is an account of how one Source realized person freed himself by living totally for others and then set about freeing others. It's all based on pure example and the partial account of a life lived. There is not a lot of esoteric teaching, thinking, and concepts in there, it's there in a sense but not directly as distractions and glittering side thoughts.
The call of Christ is so simple in its message, lose self in service to others and you will find your true self again. Think more of others and their needs and not so much of the little self's needs and wants. Learn of love, remember love and to love. The best way to teach that, is by and through example, and that's why the N.T. is so account based.
It cuts through all the misleading, extraneous, and/or distracting stuff that so many Eastern teachings are filled with. And i'm not saying that all Eastern teachings are worthless, not by any means, i've gained from my studies into these, but like Albert i've found that as belief systems, they can be limiting. When is say these things, i don't mean to offend those attached to same, or to try to hurt anyone. You may believe that all you like, you certainly seem to oft ascribe those perceptions to Albert.
Anyways, yeah if you read that link and really think about some of the real spiritual teachers and their lives of yester year, you will understand that they are not always very socially accepted, liked, and what not. They do not tell others what their false self aspects want to hear. They are sometimes even controversial and upsetting to others, like Jesus with the Pharisees, Scribes, and Sadducee's....
Well i would say there is a little bit of Jesus AND Pharisee in all of us. Best be sure what one is primarily
emotionally reacting from. The clue is in the term emotionally reacting and in reactive.