spooky2
|
Hi Dude, I second Don that probably both systems are not that elaborated, meaning objectively accurate that exact relations could be made between the two. Of Robert Bruce, I've read only "Astral Dynamics", and if I remember right, there he himself states that it is not meant as a set in stone, for everyone valid system. Monroe developed his system, as far as I know, through the combination of his own experiences and his Hemi-Sync-researches, which included reports of probands who had listened to those tapes (the numbering appears first to be more or less randomly, then, after "Miranon" appeared, more related to a system of 7). Roughly, we can estimate Focus 24-26 is part of the older term Astral, if not Focus 27, too. Also, the retrieval zone F23 could be counted into the Astral. Focus 10 and Focus 12 can partly be related to R. Bruces Real Time Zone, but there are many experiences which don't fit with this. Focus 15 is described by most Hemi-Sync-users as a more or less private place, with nothing happening around ("no time"), or exploring different times, mostly biographic. But, of course, "Astral" is a very blurry term, due to much quoting, re-using, copying into new books leaving it unclear what it should mean. Robert Bruce's system might appear simple at first glance. But, at least, many things are unclear to me. For example, in the so called "Real-Time-Zone" there are so many distortions, fluidity, influences of all kind (according to R. Bruce himself) that it is to question if it is justified to speak of such a zone; maybe we can take it as an idealization, an ideal nonphysical counterpart of the physical. And, at least in "Astral Dynamics", there is not so much written about "the Astral" at all. His theory about the "Astral Wind" is nothing but speculation. His theory about the mind-split is quite interesting; I had myself an experience which was at some points similar to his theory. But on the other hand, I have not found others (and myself) perceiving these bodies, and having a memory-download-experience. To notice that one forgets much of an OBE can be explained by this theory, but of course by any other theory, too, so it's the question to what degree it's generalizeable. Of course, Monroe wrote about having different bodies, but nothing about memory storage in this regard.
After all, we could check out both systems regarding how well they work practically for each of us, Don already commented about this. Robert Bruce is more focused on classic OBEing, while TMI and Bruce Moen are not focused on this in particular.
Spooky
|