vajra
Ex Member
|
Hi Pratekya. Pardon me if I'm presuming too much. I think actually that we largely agree, but could end up disagreeing on a single point.
What I tried to suggest above and have said before is pretty much what you quote of M. Scott Peck - that if mind/the cosmos is ultimately unity then if there is evil then there has to be good too. This i think is what Ah So is saying too - it's of the nature of this dualistic world and cosmos that there are opposites in everything.
That too is why as Ah So says I think it's essentially delusional to seek to suppress the negative. All of what are so called negative aspects of mind can transmute to become positives in the realised mind.
Anger is a case in point. In its negative form it is generally harmful, but acknowledged, worked with and hence transmuted by compassion for others its energy or charge can become a powerful motivation to good. Suppress it and it will most certainly find a way to bite one up the ass. There are extensive Buddhist teachings on this, for example the Metta Sutra. (?)
As I said earlier there's at least as much harm (maybe lots more) done in the name of a naive 'goody goody' refusal to engage compassionately in this reality of existence.
Putting my non-Buddhist hat back on I'd find it hard to go with the view that God didn't if indirectly create evil. It's arguable that this whole time space cause and consequence driven reality is our own creation (the creation of the collective mind of all the beings inhabiting this reality), but even if it is it's got to still lie within the span of control and what's more the will of an all knowing omnipotent and infallible God. (or highest Mind)
My preferred (non-original) way around this is that we've been given free will, and draws on Ah Sos distinction between temporal and spiritual, or relative and absolute. In our unskilled (learning) way we in this relative reality vacillate in our actions between the polarities of good and evil. (I don't much like that word because it carries such a charge of a particular sort of meaning)
But viewed from the absolute the ultimate outcomes is never in doubt - everything cancels in the end. For example - we seem to have been killed, but viewed spiritually cannot die. The fact that it's spread out over apparent time doesn't matter either - that's only a matter of perspective or how you perceive it in that centuries may be an instant from that perspective.
Modern quantum theory by the way suggests that this is perfectly feasible. (The film 'What the Bleep Do We Know' has academics setting this out in very understandable terms) This is perhaps one of the most compelling reasons to think this all just might be true.
So it's a case of whether you look at it from normal reality, or from a higher view. As Ah So says there most certainly appears to be evil here, but viewed from the absolute it's somehow just a constituent of a greater and perfect reality.
In the words of the Buddhist Heart Sutra which expresses this higher view there is no distinction between good and evil: 'form (our reality) is emptiness (the absolute) and emptiness is form, and then: 'In the same way, feeling, perception, formation, and consciousness are emptiness. Thus, Shariputra, all dharmas are emptiness. There are no characteristics. There is no birth and no cessation. There is no impurity and no purity. There is no decrease and no increase. Therefore, Shariputra, in emptiness, there is no form, no feeling, no perception, no formation, no consciousness; no eye, no ear, no nose, no tongue, no body, no mind; no appearance, no sound, no smell, no taste, no touch, no dharmas, no eye dhatu up to no mind dhatu, no dhatu of dharmas, no mind consciousness dhatu; no ignorance, no end of ignorance up to no old age and death, no end of old age and death; no suffering, no origin of suffering, no cessation of suffering, no path, no wisdom, no attainment, and no non-attainment.'
That's not saying that wrongdoing in this life is acceptable, and it's very clear that wisdom and compassion are required to live without doing wrong - but in order to learn these we need to come to understand both the higher or ultimate reality and how to live in our own reality. This why for example a realised person has no fear of death - he knows that it's not for real, that it's just an appearance...
|