I like this definition, Recoverer, because it makes the important point that the universal mind reveals what it will, according to our understanding.
It seems that our ego does, indeed, have a different goal, and would like for this ilfe, and this universe, to fit neatly into a rather small package. On our rather small packages we each have fastened or written signs of all sorts to the Creator, as we see the Creator. "Good things belong in here!" "Leave my package alone!" "Don't drop on the floor, PLEASE!"
But our packages get all tossed around in transit. Some of us end up in the astral conveyor belt by accident, or deliberate intent. "Astral traveler, here."
The Creator says, "Please don't shoot the messenger....but we're awfully busy back here. We'll try to get you where you need to be, but we can't promise you'll get there from point A to point B.
As a matter of fact, you may go from point A to point T and then back to point C again. Just the way it works here. But I'll make sure you have a good view, that is, if you want one."
love, blink
recoverer wrote on Oct 15th, 2007 at 2:29pm:Dave:
My definition of enlightenment is being able to live "completely" according to love, and understanding things according to what universal mind reveals, rather than what our beliefs assert.
This seems to be a hard state to reach, because our egoic tendencies of mind have a different goal. Such tendencies try to secure safety, continuity, happiness, peace and love, by defining what reality is all about according to their whims. They make it so one isn't willing to completely let go, so one can see how things really are. Once one does so, I doubt that what one finds can be boxed/packaged within a particular system of thought, whatever that system of thought might be.