Hey there,
thanks for your replies.
@ PhantasyMan
Thanks for your recommendations, I will definitively keep my eyes open on Dr. Yang and Adam. I liked your link concerning Consicousness and quantum physics a lot, as it provided reliable, proven evidence.
But it will take some time until I can respond on Dr. Yangs and Adams books, before I have to finish plato and Voyges into the Unknown, I try to be as fast as possible.
@Elite
There is obviously a lot that cannot be known about the spiritual realms, and I think that we will never be able to reveal every little detail about the world to come, but at least when it comes to appearances, there must be something like a connection between here and there. Otherwise they could not travel to our earth realm.
I can only make assumptions on this one, but if our soul has the ability to travel to the other side, there must be similarities, the first point to hang on then really is energy, as it never fades, but changes its states.
If we have something like a soul or a "light body", that came from over there, then there is a link, some call it silver chord, if I got it right, the connection from our "I/there" (spirit, "energetic" being) and the "I/here" in carne, nothing like retrivals or spiritual contacts would be possible without a connection.
If I had to imagine the afterlife, I think Platos approach is the most "realistic" (my pov), that this world is only an imperfect image of the world to come (or the world the soul came from and will go again after death).
So if it would be possible to find evidence for "heaven's gate", I think we would have crossed the last boundary in human mind and understanding.
The natural laws...yes they belong to the physical, but even a place like heaven must have laws, even if they are far away from that, we can imagine and understand while trying to explain it via rational approach.
It is after all the lacking evidence... I thought if there was a chance to crash the last boundary, we would have to start research there, where physics and religious beliefs cross.
@ spooky
Maybe there is something like an energetic field crossing the boundaries between our and the spiritual world, a connection, through which information from over there can "travel" to psychcs/ medial/sensitive people who have not lost their "third eye".
energeia: Aristotle statet > energeia is the "living activity" (different from dynamis, the pure potential or possibility to "do sth."). It is an aspekt of the "shape" (eidos), that is also suggested as energetic, because it includes energiea, the "living activity". The other aspect seems to be the "entelechy", the "goal" (or for what a certain thing is meant to be, e.g. a tree or a flower blooms) a thing has included in itself.
So if our entelechy says "you are born to be ceased to exists after death" then it would be much like this.
The term "closed system"...yes it is of course a little bit too simple, but to imagine how the energy floats around in our body, their must be at least something like a "circuit" (like a circuit you need to run lamps) in which it can float, and manifests in the happenings it causes inside the body. If we take a closer look on our skin, there so much "holes" in it, energy has the ability to vanish from the body "caloric energy".
If it was really closed, it could live as an autonomic being, to have a "perpetuum mobile" as driving force, but this is not the case, if you do not "feed" the body regularly, it starves until breakdown.
So if there are beings on the other side, and we will also be like them after passing over, it must be at least possible to "access" those areas, my assumption is via energetic change, might be that the energy on the other side has more different aspects than our physical energy, or that we can produce via technical devices, but there must be at least a similar aspect, to make contacts or "phase shifting" after death possible.
@ dave
So it is very much like having different "planes", each one has is own amount of information included. Reminds me a lot of what I read on a link bets postet, that we live along an large amount of information, and everyone feeds the universe with new ones, so to say the universe as our "over-brain".
Potentials, that was because I relied in this case on energy, like in physics, the stone example again, if you pick it up, you stored "potential energy", if you let it go, it changes to "kinetic energy", also "caloric energy" through the friction that comes up while "hitting" the airs molecules.
So if it is possible to change like in our example, it makes sense to talk about building a world of "potential states". It was where I put all my hope, for us to have the possibility to find the key maybe via quantum physics, it opened new doors in science, why not in meta-science?.
You see where I stuck..not in focus 23 but even worse...
Epiphenomenon, means entities that have a cause, but no impact on sth. else, so the material reality is, according to our "real" (spiritual) reality, nothing more than a nuance, like Plato said.
@orlando
And there comes the problem, in saying "it is not really to know by us" (not even the smallest details like a "gate to heaven", or the entrances that "information from the other side" can use to manifest here. If we are not to understand any spiritual detail, that we would have to come to the conclusion that we are non of them, were never, and will never be.
It is hard to belief in something or take it for granted, if emotion/intuition/assumption is part of to reveal something, especially an existence after this life, so how could we or our soul-aspect ever exist in spirit realms, when not really being able to remind ourselves of anything that was before birth, if we rely on a system, that makes us being part of oversouls or a higher self. I often recitet Plato when it comes to afterlife principles, but even Plato says, the "eros", our craving for the higher realm he thought of were our soul has lived before incarnation, is an emotional aspect, longing for the "higher world", the perfect world, of which the earth realm is an imperfect copy.
I read the article briefly, and it corresponds with my outlook on paranormality. You will get a more detailed answer, but I have to think about it for a moment.
So let's see how far we can go
regards,
pulsar