pulsar
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 163
Europe
Gender:
|
Hey everyone,
Just wanted to add something concerning the daydreaming method, Matthew referred to. I also tried to get access to my subconsciousness via daydreaming, just let the thoughts flow, but not with the intend to travel to different realms. I do it mostly for more profane reasons, e.g. when I feel like my mind is overloaded and I am confused, or working on a task and it does not work well and I lose patience or desire to resign, I just switch to this daydreaming mode, in order to calm down, to structure what is buzzing around my brain, so to have the possibility to go on more relaxed, not in a hurry. One may ask what that has to do with subconsciousness. Well, the subconsciousness is what I would call a section where our innermost feelings, goals and beliefs are "stored". So for me it works, when I just use this method to remind myself why I am really doing e.g. this task, because I want to, not only need to do so, so reminding myself that it is a part of the puzzle, that, when put together, is what my future (the future I want, not the one that is forced on me) is. That helps to ease exhaustion, and to view this task with more, I call it hypocritically "empathy", not just stubborn chewing.
But I doubt, even if you get some information about the afterlife, that it must be just like the image you got from it. In my former post I talked about this different type of views on heaven that people who had the matching experiences, described. So if I got it right, according to the general beliefs, one is creating his own reality, right? So referring to heaven, which is suggested to be a place of salvation, as the views on how salvation must be like in the eye of different people are also varying. I assumed that the feeling that one gets of heaven might be the same, now I refer to some nde's I read the net, all describe the same kind of feelings, unconditional love, being one with god, feeling of being united with an allknowing consciousness and therefor feeling like the thirst for the biggest question about life being quenched. If the feeling is the same, might be an approach towards the question wether there is something behind the curtain or not. The next point is, that researchers tried to gather information on the quantity of such phenomenons, I remember an attempt with 60 patients in near death conditions, only 8 of those really had an nde. On the background of this, I now tend to ask, how valuble this experiences are, if they were just lack of oxygen or a trip made up in our mind, through biochemical reactions, the brain emitting dmt, that is able to bring across such experiences, a brain lacking oxygen is also able to play "mind trips". There we have low quantity. So maybe attemps like this might not be the right way to access the ultimate truth. But the dmt thesis is only one explanation, I remeber a patient named Pam, during her surgery she was set "braindead", flat line brainwaves. So might we say the consciousness is there but not necessarily placed in our brain. But where to search then? Religious teachings sometimes refer to the heart as the place to be for our soul. So if the brain is not neccessary to emulate conscious feelings... . These are for sure just some little "facts" from observing, but they seem not to convey about if "it" is real or not.
So I do not want to say that your methods are only a matter of phantasy (phantasy for me, even if I am stuck with my believing in facts, is the highest gift on can get. Imagination, visionary thinking, is not only spiritual bound, I think science would not have been possible, if there haven't been people, with the ability to imagine how to make a the principles in nature "touchable", you know that the models used in physics to explain how the laws, nature is bound to (not in a biological sense) work, it is a concept that was bred in a "visionary" brain. But what makes this laws accessable, is some mathematic approach. Won't work for the afterlife, but I found an interesting book, you might have heard of Frank J. Tiplers' "The Physics of Immortality", claiming via his omega point theory to be able to verify god by formulas used in physics, I went not through the entire book, but may present it here on the board, when I am through.
So it is logic vs. intuition. One could really say that we just, in order to scientific approach to explain the universe/nature, have dismissed intuition as being just a cave mans device to live by.
The more I think about this, the more I know that I really do not know.
Love,
pulsar
|