Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
A Must-Read Book on Channeling (Read 7393 times)
Rondele
Ex Member


A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Apr 18th, 2007 at 4:26pm
 
Thanks to Recoverer for mentioning the book by Joe Fisher, "The Siren Call of Angry Ghosts."

I urge everyone to go to amazon and read the reviews.  Channeled material is very enticing but it's also extremely misleading and potentially dangerous.

Here's the link.

http://www.amazon.com/Siren-Call-Hungry-Ghosts-Investigation/dp/1931044023

Please everyone, before you get caught up with this sort of material, at least be aware of the danger.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Reply #1 - Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:02pm
 
  Hi Ronedale, have you ever investigated or studied the Cayce material?   If so, what do you think of it?

  There are actually warnings in that material regarding certain aspects of (particularly mediumistic) channeling as well.  Among some of the things said by Cayce's source is to not listen to any spirits or channels who deny the life, example, death, and resurrection of Yeshua.   Cayce had a lot of rather psychic people seek readings over the years, various channelers/mediums, people who saw auras, people who saw visions, clairaudient folks, automatic writers, etc.

   In any case, i believe channeling is a very, very complex and many shades of gray issue.  Even though i like, respect and believe a lot of the Cayce material, i do not believe it is completely free of errors or what Cayce's source called "wavering" not to mention the automatic skewing which happens when trying to translate nonphysical awarenesses, info, etc. into understandable left brain info and language. 
There are some good outlines in this material about channeling and the various factors involved beyond the obvious ones of a misleading or a simply ignorant guide verse a very deeply spiritually attuned Being being involved. 

  In Cayce's own example, even simple things such as his diet and health at the time could and did affect the quality and flow of the info.   Or the influence and thoughts of various people that were in the room when he was giving a reading, especially if there was any emotionally charged feelings/thoughts going on.  This could and sometime did affect and influence the content or the accuracy of the info.

  The best and most clear readings that Cayce gave, tended to follow a common pattern where Cayce was in good health, in good mood preferably after prayer with a group of people, and oft times they would tell jokes before a session, the person seeking the info was seeking out of a helpful motivation to both self and others (not just mere curiosity or even worse material greed, ego, etc.) and the state of those surrounding Cayce at the time of the reading and them being positive as well as Cayce the actual "channel". 

  Even factors such as his source saying that Cayce was primarily positively charged in nature, and so the best person to ask the questions during the session would be primarily negatively charged in nature in order to create a better balance. 

  Basically meaning ( i think) that Cayce was more "masculine" than not, or imbalanced towards that and that someone more passive and feminine/yin in nature and imbalanced towards that. 

   And this is just a few of the major factors involved, let alone the subtlies which are harder to gauge.  Cayce fortunately never had any deeply negative beings come through, though occasionally a discarnate or averagely attuned Soul would communicate via Cayce.   But he wasn't a medium or channel in the conventional sense, he didn't let other consciousnesses into his body, he would relay and communicate info that they were giving him.

  In other words, Cayce was and acted like a super sensitive radio receiver, and the right conditions had to be present for a more accurate, helpful, holistic, and broad reading to come through.   Occasionally some of these did not "line up", sometimes certain aspects did and others didn't.   Sometimes all the major factors were all harmonious and more towards the spiritual.

  Some Cayce researchers have identified up to 10 or 12 various sources for the actual info, including everything from subconscious minds of various personalities, spiritual "masters", Christ, Archangels, various guides under the Elders, the Universal consciousness itself, the Akashic records, the material forces (the "lowest", least helpful, or accurate source), discarnate people.

If Cayce didn't go so deep in his trance and submerged his conscious personality so much, he would have been a much, much worse and inaccurate channel because he lacked the necessary balance between body, mind and spirit that really accurate and helpful info requires to come through. 

  His own source oft said that Cayce needed much more spirituality in his life (for better, more holistic, and clear info to come through), or pointed out his lack of physical health and unwillingness to gain more discipline along those lines and that made the quality of his readings suffer.   

  Yes, it seems way too many really over simplify the nature of channeling or of obtaining psychic info in general.   And yet, does this mean we should completely turn away our ears towards those that would act as channels?   To me it doesn't, but rather discernment is very important.   The motivations, intents, etc. of the channel themselves, the people seeking the info, etc. are the most important factors.   

   To me it seems that the New Age in many respects has become just another capitalistic business, and many are trying to materially profit of it with little real service towards others.   I'm not against channels charging some money for their services, but such things as a sliding scale, only trying to cover one's basic necessities, helping others freely sometimes, etc. all seem to be the hallmark of a truly spiritual channel, such as Gordon Smith, Cayce, or the likes.   Notice how these tend to be more accurate on average and can answer very specific questions and have many verifications?

  A big key is their motivation, more so to help others than to just make a living.   I think people who charge 700 dollars a pop and who seek a lot of celebrity are probably best left alone or at least approached with wide open eyes and ears.

 

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rondele
Ex Member


Re: A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Reply #2 - Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:33pm
 
Yes I've read a lot of the Cayce material.  I think you make a good point, the motivation of the channeler is very important. 

Same thing about retrievals.  Rev Vincent, who wrote about retrievals way back in the 1940s, always started that work in a prayerful way.  I suppose when we open ourselves up to anything in the afterlife, whether it's retrievals or trying to channel some entity, we are extremely vulnerable. 

Swedenborg warned that there's a tremendous amount of deception in the afterlife, and after reading the reviews of Joe Fisher's book, this is a warning that rings loud and clear.

Here's the thing.....Fisher researched a lot of what the entities (or guides) said about those in the group.  He was unable to verify ANYTHING that was said even tho it sounded very believable and detailed.  So when we see mediums on TV and they say stuff about members in the audience, it is never completely detailed to the extent that it is possible to completely say it was true.

For example, how about giving people the name of the street and house # where the deceased lived?  Should be easy, right?  How about giving the deceased's SS #! Ah there's the catch.....it never quites get to that level.  Close, very close, but never a home run.  I personally think they give us just enough to make us think it's for real.

After my dad died, I went to a highly regarded psychic here in VA.  I paid a nice fat fee.  She quickly went into her "trance" and told me my dad was right there in the room with us.  She described him.  Could have fit description of almost any elderly white male.  Nothing distinctive.  She told me he was happy on the other side, helping deceased children adapt to their new environment.  Told me he was proud of me.  Finally I asked her if she could ask my dad a question.  She said yes, so I asked him to tell me where he lived in FL before he died.  Suddenly the lady's expression changed, she looked a bit startled, and said she was losing his energy and could not tell me anything.  Cute huh?  Everything she told me was generalized, nothing whatsoever specific to the point where I knew for a certainty that she was in touch with my dad.

My own opinion.....material from the afterlife is highly suspicious.  And in some cases, as Fisher found out, extremely dangerous.  Read some of the reviews on amazon, you'll see what I mean.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Reply #3 - Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:44pm
 
Ahso:

Thank you for a detailed description of what Edgar Cayce did. I was under the impression that he allowed spirits to enter him.

My feeling is that as long as one doesn't live completely according to divine will, they aren't going to be a completely clear channel. I've had extensive contact with spirit beings who represent the light, and I've found that even though I've worked on myself a lot and have received a lot of energtic work, it isn't that easy to receive messages. I'm good at receiving visual imagery and waking dreams, but when it comes to receiving thoughts and hearing voices my interpreter will get in the way at times. This is one of the reasons that I doubt that the people from ACIM and Conversations with God spoke with the spirits they claim to have spoken with. It is hard to imagine that they received word after word as they supposedly did so easily. Perhaps an earthbound spirit could communicate to them easily, but a spirit from a realm of light? I believe that you need to up your vibrational rate a bit before you can make contact in such a manner. I'm not 100% certain.

Regarding the book "A siren call for hungry ghosts" it is possible that some of the channelers were faking it, some were tapping into their subconscious mind, and some were making contact with deceptive spirits. The main entity Joe Fisher had contact with stated that Jesus Christ is a being of just average development.  
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 19th, 2007 at 6:36pm by recoverer »  
 
IP Logged
 
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Reply #4 - Apr 20th, 2007 at 11:28am
 
rondele wrote on Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:33pm:
Swedenborg warned that there's a tremendous amount of deception in the afterlife, and after reading the reviews of Joe Fisher's book, this is a warning that rings loud and clear.


 Yeah, don't doubt that there is at least some deception going on, after all, the "afterlife" is populated by people! Wink   Plenty of deception going on here in C1, and no doubt some take such dynamics over into less physical states.   Just thinking about everyday stuff like the I-net and p.c.'s, and how many folks out there are creating spyware, viruses, etc. which can harm peoples p.c's or steal info, makes me wonder what the hey is wrong with this world and the people in it.   I mean there are literally millions and thousands of spyware and viruses, etc., floating around out there.  

 In any case, not something to focus on for me, but i'm aware of it at the same time.

Quote:
Here's the thing.....Fisher researched a lot of what the entities (or guides) said about those in the group.  He was unable to verify ANYTHING that was said even tho it sounded very believable and detailed.  So when we see mediums on TV and they say stuff about members in the audience, it is never completely detailed to the extent that it is possible to completely say it was true.


  Yes, it does seem that detailed and repeatable verifications are rather rare in todays psychic world, but at the same time i cut the average psychic some slack (if they are not charging much and not seeking celebrity) because its hard to translate nonphysical info into our language and more left brain understanding, takes a lot, and a big factor beyond motivation and the like, is the spiritual developement of the channel--kind of what Recoverer wrote about above.  I guess what i mean, is that it's not necesssarily a misleading or negative consciousness involved, but rather oft just the lack of balance, right vibratory state, etc. of the channel.  

Quote:
For example, how about giving people the name of the street and house # where the deceased lived?  Should be easy, right?  How about giving the deceased's SS #! Ah there's the catch.....it never quites get to that level.  Close, very close, but never a home run.  I personally think they give us just enough to make us think it's for real.


  Well even the best channels or psychics sometimes have a hard time with stuff like the above.  It requires a very fine and consistent balance between the right and left brain aspects.   I liken it to astro principles and archetypes, for example Mercury is said to correspond to the logical, reasoning, conscious mind or what we would call primary C1 and left brain awareness and perception.   Mercury is very good at detail and seeing the individual parts, but when it comes to the whole, the general picture, it can't see the forest for the trees.

 Neptune is the super psychic, feeling oriented, mystically inclined planet which best corresponds to the more generalized, whole perceiving, feeling oriented right brain.   Neptune can't see the trees for the forest.  In some ways these are opposites, and to get good and accurate psychic info, you have to bring these into balance and merge them.    It's not easy since they are so different in nature.  Takes a lot of practice and again is somewhat an attribute of greater spiritual development than the average as well.  

 Cayce's source said this was definitely a factor in his ability to give such readings, that he as Cayce was connected to some rather intune personalities within his greater or total self, who meditated, prayed, and served others a lot in their lives.   His Soul overall was developed beyond the average.

Quote:
After my dad died, I went to a highly regarded psychic here in VA.  I paid a nice fat fee.  She quickly went into her "trance" and told me my dad was right there in the room with us.  She described him.  Could have fit description of almost any elderly white male.  Nothing distinctive.  She told me he was happy on the other side, helping deceased children adapt to their new environment.  Told me he was proud of me.  Finally I asked her if she could ask my dad a question.  She said yes, so I asked him to tell me where he lived in FL before he died.  Suddenly the lady's expression changed, she looked a bit startled, and said she was losing his energy and could not tell me anything.  Cute huh?  Everything she told me was generalized, nothing whatsoever specific to the point where I knew for a certainty that she was in touch with my dad.


  Yeah, seems she was either deluded, consciously misleading, or just way to balanced to the right brain (very Neptunian or Lunar) aspect and thus could only pick up on very general and broad themes.

 Also though, to play devil's advocate for a moment as well, i do believe that the attitude of the person receiving the info is quite important as well.   If you go into a "reading" or anything psychic with a very doubtful, overly skeptical, suspicious, etc. attitude, i believe that this can negatively affect the quality of the reading as well.   I'm not saying that this was the case with you and the above, but just trying to generally point this out to others.  

 I've been to a few sensitives, and i've found that the best thing to do, is to try to clear you mind, lightly meditate, surround both of you in White Light and to ask for only the most universally helpful info for you (and them) to come through.   The last sensitive i saw some 5 years ago, i did this with, and it seemed to increase the accuracy of the reading though honestly i did not ask too many very specific questions relating to C1 issues though.   Plus we had a good/harmonious connection and felt like we knew each other already, which i think can also help.  


Quote:
My own opinion.....material from the afterlife is highly suspicious.  And in some cases, as Fisher found out, extremely dangerous.  Read some of the reviews on amazon, you'll see what I mean.


 Thanks, i will check out the reviews at some point.  
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Reply #5 - Apr 20th, 2007 at 12:18pm
 
recoverer wrote on Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:44pm:
Ahso:

Thank you for a detailed description of what Edgar Cayce did. I was under the impression that he allowed spirits to enter him.


  Your welcome.  No way Jose, though i can't say it never happened.  But usually (the huge majority of the time) he spoke in his voice (with less of a southern accent though), and it seemed at times like he was "conversing" and relaying info.

  Basically before every reading, he would pray to God and while praying would put his hands to his forehead, and usually he would see a flash of light (i believe sometimes golden, and sometimes a different shade).   That was the "sign" to him that he could give the reading, and when he got this sign, he then put his hands down to rest on his solar plexus area and would start to get very deeply relaxed and would go through and past the R.E.M state.  When his eye lids started to flutter, then someone would give him suggestions to start the reading.

    I imagine that if we could have measured his brainwave states, that on average it would have been from mid/deep theta to mid delta state.   Quite deep in other words, and probably is part of the reason why he rarely remembered any of the reading itself.  But that is just conjecture on my part.   

  His source talked a lot about the endocrine glands and how they are a materialization of the spiritual centers, and it said that Cayce primarily operated through his Pineal gland when giving a reading.   This means, he was entering into a rather deep and expanded level of consciousness on average--rather universally oriented.  This ability was primarily linked to his motivation and spiritual ideals-- to help all regardless, and linked to several lives part of his Disc which were/are very spiritually intune, more so than Cayce was during most of his life.

Quote:
My feeling is that as long as one doesn't live completely according to divine will, they aren't going to be a completely clear channel. I've had extensive contact with spirit beings who represent the light, and I've found that even though I've worked on myself a lot and have received a lot of energtic work, it isn't that easy to receive messages. I'm good at receiving visual imagery and waking dreams, but when it comes to receiving thoughts and hearing voices my interpreter will get in the way at times. This is one of the reasons that I doubt that the people from ACIM and Conversations with God spoke with the spirits they claim to have spoken with. It is hard to imagine that they received word after word as they supposedly did so easily. Perhaps an earthbound spirit could communicate to them easily, but a spirit from a realm of light? I believe that you need to up your vibrational rate a bit before you can make contact in such a manner. I'm not 100% certain.


   Yes, i tend to agree with the above, though again i see some subtlies in there as well.   For example, we all have what i call our average or primary vibratory level, but during sincere prayer, meditation, helping someone out relatively selflessly, etc. we can tempoarily raise our vibratory state.  For example in E.C.'s case, since he lacked the balance and consistent spiritual livingness, he had to go very deep within self to lose self (or the conscious, left brain self) and become more purely receptive/passive in nature, hence "unconscious" to C1 consciousness.   Going so deeply in trance allowed him to somewhat get around the distortion that his conscious personality would have "interjected" into the readings.  I also think he got a lot of help from some very powerful and intune "guides" to help out.
  He did get increasingly and more clearly psychic in his waking state as he got older, and started to remember once in a while a bit here and there of the readings he gave.   Basically the more spiritual he became, the more karma he balanced, the more he came close to that state where he might have been able to obtain such universal, detailed, and accurate info in waking state as well.

  Regarding Conversations with God, i agree, i tend to see it more as inspirational writing which is essentially coming from his higher/total self, but of course it has a shading in of his C1 personality and consciousness as well.   I agree with a lot in there (of what i've read), but certainly not even close to all.

Quote:
Regarding the book "A siren call for hungry ghosts" it is possible that some of the channelers were faking it, some were tapping into their subconscious mind, and some were making contact with deceptive spirits. The main entity Joe Fisher had contact with stated that Jesus Christ is a being of just average development.   


  I agree, there are probably various factors different to each case.  Then there is also always the question, how verifed is Joe's accounts to begin with?   Do we know he really met with a bunch of different practicing mediums, etc., and have all these experiences?   Can we prove such things?  How do we know he's not just a Christian fundamentalist or corporate/gov. disinfo agent trying to smear anything related to channeling, psychism, or what not?  What is Joe's deeper motivation, intent, etc.?   

  I really don't know since i haven't read the book, nor even the reviews yet, but these are just some of the questions that come to my mind (i try to consider as many possibilities as i can).   We need to look at not only the channels and their motivations, but also at the people who are writing about them as well.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Reply #6 - Apr 20th, 2007 at 12:51pm
 
Quote:
recoverer wrote on Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:44pm:
Ahso:

Ahso said:  Basically before every reading, he would pray to God and while praying would put his hands to his forehead, and usually he would see a flash of light (i believe sometimes golden, and sometimes a different shade).   That was the "sign" to him that he could give the reading, and when he got this sign, he then put his hands down to rest on his solar plexus area and would start to get very deeply relaxed and would go through and past the R.E.M state.  When his eye lids started to flutter, then someone would give him suggestions to start the reading.

"The above sounds familiar. Before I meditate and go to sleep to at night I put my hands together near my forehead and say "to God, to Christ, to my higher self, to the beings of love and light who help me. Most of the time I see a light flash after doing so. Sometimes this light will flash in order to say "yes" to what I just thought."

Albert said: Regarding the book "A siren call for hungry ghosts" it is possible that some of the channelers were faking it, some were tapping into their subconscious mind, and some were making contact with deceptive spirits. The main entity Joe Fisher had contact with stated that Jesus Christ is a being of just average development.    


Justing responded:  I agree, there are probably various factors different to each case.  Then there is also always the question, how verifed is Joe's accounts to begin with?   Do we know he really met with a bunch of different practicing mediums, etc., and have all these experiences?   Can we prove such things?  How do we know he's not just a Christian fundamentalist or corporate/gov. disinfo agent trying to smear anything related to channeling, psychism, or what not?  What is Joe's deeper motivation, intent, etc.?    

 I really don't know since i haven't read the book, nor even the reviews yet, but these are just some of the questions that come to my mind (i try to consider as many possibilities as i can).   We need to look at not only the channels and their motivations, but also at the people who are writing about them as well.


"Some people would say Joe was a new ager. He had written a book about reincarnation. His story sounds legit. I've read the book only one time, and like the reviewers read it in one day. Therefore, I didn't go over it with a magnifying glass. There might be instances where beings of light speak through a person's body. For example, Ahso through Rosalind Mcknight. I don't know. Below is a short article on Joe Fisher."

http://www.paraview.com/fisher/index.htm
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AhSoLaoTsuAhhOmmra
Ex Member


Re: A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Reply #7 - Apr 20th, 2007 at 1:12pm
 
  Thanks for the further info and the link, i had started to read the reviews after i wrote the above.

  Interesting stuff.  Yet, look how many mediums, psychics, etc. are out there and whose lives are not being so adversely affected.   Cases like the above, seem to be more the minority.   It seems a indicative sign of whether or not someone is in touch with more helpful and loving consciousnesses, is simply just the average state of the person's sense of well being and happiness (unless of course some very stressful and hard to deal with C1 issues are going on).   Is the person more depressed than not, do they have the abilitity to take joy in simple things, to laugh, make jokes, smile often?   

To be sure, sometimes a real channel is very tested by life and their karma, and so temporary and even deep depression can occur, but if they are truly in touch with universal and loving sources, this will eventually bring joy, peace, and the likes to both self/the channel and to others.    I guess that whole fruits thing that Yeshua said applies well. 

  I think its also important to remember that Fear itself can become a powerful Siren Call, and if we focus too much on the negative, it can attract that too. 

  Personally, i wouldn't ever let another consciousness occupy my body, and until i gain more balance and love, i'm not even trying to develop my more general psychic abilities.   I'll let them unfold like a flower in their own good time, and not try to force or rush the process.

  Maya, maya, maya everywhere but not a drop to help.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: A Must-Read Book on Channeling
Reply #8 - Apr 20th, 2007 at 1:29pm
 
Ahso:

The book doesn't speak of mediums. It speaks of people who allow a spirit to use their body for communication purposes. When they do so the spirits play the role of guru while people sit and listen to them. I believe this is a different thing than say for example, helping a grieving person make contact with a deceased love one during one reading. As you know, there are some good guys out there.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 20th, 2007 at 7:14pm by recoverer »  
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.