rondele wrote on Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:33pm:Swedenborg warned that there's a tremendous amount of deception in the afterlife, and after reading the reviews of Joe Fisher's book, this is a warning that rings loud and clear.
Yeah, don't doubt that there is at least some deception going on, after all, the "afterlife" is populated by people!

Plenty of deception going on here in C1, and no doubt some take such dynamics over into less physical states. Just thinking about everyday stuff like the I-net and p.c.'s, and how many folks out there are creating spyware, viruses, etc. which can harm peoples p.c's or steal info, makes me wonder what the hey is wrong with this world and the people in it. I mean there are literally millions and thousands of spyware and viruses, etc., floating around out there.
In any case, not something to focus on for me, but i'm aware of it at the same time.
Quote:Here's the thing.....Fisher researched a lot of what the entities (or guides) said about those in the group. He was unable to verify ANYTHING that was said even tho it sounded very believable and detailed. So when we see mediums on TV and they say stuff about members in the audience, it is never completely detailed to the extent that it is possible to completely say it was true.
Yes, it does seem that detailed and repeatable verifications are rather rare in todays psychic world, but at the same time i cut the average psychic some slack (if they are not charging much and not seeking celebrity) because its hard to translate nonphysical info into our language and more left brain understanding, takes a lot, and a big factor beyond motivation and the like, is the spiritual developement of the channel--kind of what Recoverer wrote about above. I guess what i mean, is that it's not necesssarily a misleading or negative consciousness involved, but rather oft just the lack of balance, right vibratory state, etc. of the channel.
Quote:For example, how about giving people the name of the street and house # where the deceased lived? Should be easy, right? How about giving the deceased's SS #! Ah there's the catch.....it never quites get to that level. Close, very close, but never a home run. I personally think they give us just enough to make us think it's for real.
Well even the best channels or psychics sometimes have a hard time with stuff like the above. It requires a very fine and consistent balance between the right and left brain aspects. I liken it to astro principles and archetypes, for example Mercury is said to correspond to the logical, reasoning, conscious mind or what we would call primary C1 and left brain awareness and perception. Mercury is very good at detail and seeing the individual parts, but when it comes to the whole, the general picture, it can't see the forest for the trees.
Neptune is the super psychic, feeling oriented, mystically inclined planet which best corresponds to the more generalized, whole perceiving, feeling oriented right brain. Neptune can't see the trees for the forest. In some ways these are opposites, and to get good and accurate psychic info, you have to bring these into balance and merge them. It's not easy since they are so different in nature. Takes a lot of practice and again is somewhat an attribute of greater spiritual development than the average as well.
Cayce's source said this was definitely a factor in his ability to give such readings, that he as Cayce was connected to some rather intune personalities within his greater or total self, who meditated, prayed, and served others a lot in their lives. His Soul overall was developed beyond the average.
Quote:After my dad died, I went to a highly regarded psychic here in VA. I paid a nice fat fee. She quickly went into her "trance" and told me my dad was right there in the room with us. She described him. Could have fit description of almost any elderly white male. Nothing distinctive. She told me he was happy on the other side, helping deceased children adapt to their new environment. Told me he was proud of me. Finally I asked her if she could ask my dad a question. She said yes, so I asked him to tell me where he lived in FL before he died. Suddenly the lady's expression changed, she looked a bit startled, and said she was losing his energy and could not tell me anything. Cute huh? Everything she told me was generalized, nothing whatsoever specific to the point where I knew for a certainty that she was in touch with my dad.
Yeah, seems she was either deluded, consciously misleading, or just way to balanced to the right brain (very Neptunian or Lunar) aspect and thus could only pick up on very general and broad themes.
Also though, to play devil's advocate for a moment as well, i do believe that the attitude of the person receiving the info is quite important as well. If you go into a "reading" or anything psychic with a very doubtful, overly skeptical, suspicious, etc. attitude, i believe that this can negatively affect the quality of the reading as well. I'm not saying that this was the case with you and the above, but just trying to generally point this out to others.
I've been to a few sensitives, and i've found that the best thing to do, is to try to clear you mind, lightly meditate, surround both of you in White Light and to ask for only the most universally helpful info for you (and them) to come through. The last sensitive i saw some 5 years ago, i did this with, and it seemed to increase the accuracy of the reading though honestly i did not ask too many very specific questions relating to C1 issues though. Plus we had a good/harmonious connection and felt like we knew each other already, which i think can also help.
Quote:My own opinion.....material from the afterlife is highly suspicious. And in some cases, as Fisher found out, extremely dangerous. Read some of the reviews on amazon, you'll see what I mean.
Thanks, i will check out the reviews at some point.