Cricket,
Am I to understand that you mean that we should not engage in a power struggle? That is how I read your post, though I am prone to see that point of view.
-------
To the idea of banning or censoring expression:
I have no issues with Tempest. She and I could disagree on the very fact that we exist and each of us would have a valid argument based on our experiences. I cannot speak for Tempest's experiences, nor she for mine. I view Tempests posts as just a different experience for a different person. I am secure enough in my experiences that I am not threatened by her posts, but quite frankly, find them funny. They are not funny from the standpoint of discounting them, but funny in the fact that she illicits such a flurry of responses.
I am not here to enlighten anyone. I am here to enlighten myself. My ego will not be wounded or bruised because I want to believe that everyone shares my perceptions. At this moment, someone reading this posts may want to respond to this post because they feel that I have somehow wounded them, but I say to them that I do not disagree with you, but I do not share your perception. I cannot discount or suppress expression simply because it fails to fall within my framework.
In the end, it will be Bruce's decision, though I feel his posting guidelines say it all.

E.