spooky2
|
Quote Stacy: "So am I correct that we mean the same thing? half active imagination = action-reaction"
When you manipulate something, and a person is turning the head saying "Hey! What you're doing here?!" that would be a very good sign that you're not alone with your fantasy. A standard for me is I imagine a landscape. Mostly a park, woods or something like that. Then I walk around. If I had something specific in mind to do, I would remember, for example meeting someone. This landscape now is a sort of background, a space I created for something to happen, priming the pump as Bruce has called it. If then someone shows up I mostly don't care much of the surrounding, and usually it's becoming to get fast, it feels as if something is using my ability to imagine much faster as I do it on my own, and this is I think the translation process, you get something through nonphysical senses (who knows what this actually is) and then the imaginative ability is used to make a representation of it. Once I thought I was in F27. I remembered that "The Park" is suggested to be a sort of public area, where actually different persons can meet. So I decided to do a test. I tried to change the sky/the weather. I thought I had success, though it was not easy, having changed it into something different, but then it jumped back to its original look, like a rubber band. I thought then that in this moment I was seeing an independent place. But generally, I cannot tell wether this or that detail is made up by me or actually something independent of my personal mind; I judge more the entire happening, if the whole thing is feeling like private fantasy or if it's more, like too much unexpected things happened, simply too many things happened, or it's just too strange for being my fantasy lol! Quote Stacy: "If I used the 'half active imagination = action-reaction' method along with intent could/would this draw people into the script I started?" I'm not sure if, or to what degree this is possible. I think who could show up in a setting are your personal helpers, as I guess they know what you're thinking and doing and why and they like sometimes to play along (at least mine). When you have one or more partners for exploration, then I guess it could be that a surrounding, a story or whatever you use as a start setting could bleed through to the other, but also vice versa. As to strangers, I don't know really...if they, so to say, would "hook up" to your imagination. The closest to this that I can remember is when I did a particular type of retrievals. I called it "blind retrievals". I was on my way to F27 and thought, try to do a retrieval en passant; I sort of radiated in a white loving manner (at least that's what I wanted to appear) and spread the message that if there is someone who wants to get out and have a ride with me then just come here, I am going right now. To my surprise this was always successful. When moving upwards, I found there were always people with me. I suspect they must have been not the really closed down types, but I don't know how this works. But what you always can do is to state what you want and what not, for example if you only want contact with certain people and not with everybody who is just hanging around nearby and is attracted for whatever reason, then say (or communicate it in whatever way) this in your mind.
Quote Stacy: "I don't know how many foggy spaces there are but this one is very peaceful and I did not feel alone either." Yes, I found this white foggy place which is beyond forms, and maybe this white fog is just to give us something to say "there is no form here". Sounds very similar to this place I frequently visit. If you want to explore this further, but don't know what to do in this nothingness (well you don't have to do anything, maybe it's even better to just do nothing and not explore), then you might try not to search around you if you can find someone outside you, but to focus on the "here", on the "within" (this is of course metaphoric, but it works for me). I then always notice I'm not alone, quite the opposite. Hearing works better there than seeing so I found. From some level on descriptions will become more poetic than logical. I for example like "the emptiness which is richness". I have those impressions either in the white foggy place, or in blackness, or in what looks like outer space, star dots, galaxies and such. But of course there are other foggy places, quite a lot I think, but the difference is easy to notice, as usual after a short time a scene is forming, someone is showing up, so that this foggy visual in this case is a sort of "tuning in" static, or, well, simply a foggy place, maybe astral London. But, as I said, the difference is immense and it's impossible to confuse it.
Rob, I would say these cloudy shapes in my experience are just too diffuse to be actual shapes, but too differentiated than to be just blank. It's as if it's formless, but also that there is something (but not really things, you know). Maybe a bit like the fog in the movie "The Fog" (but take that horror figures away), because there it glowed too, but it wasn't really glowing; overall the visual aspect was as if to say "the visual here is not important". If I had to paint it, I would use aquacolor wet-in-wet technique or airbrush. And I think Stacy is right, maybe it's not difficult at all for you to go to Focus 27. You could try to go through the Focus Levels. You know, there is meanwhile quite a lot information, "rotes" out there and help, from all the ones who use this Focus Level method, that I guess it is becoming more and more easy to travel this way.
Spooky
|