DocM
|
I heard on the news recently of a speaker on the Holocaust, who, when confronted with statements about the Holocaust being a myth while she was speaking, shouted out "your grandmother was a criminal!" to the heckler. Each time the heckler shouted, she shouted this phrase back. Finally, the heckler went quiet, puzzled, not understanding how this speaker could have known his grandmother or what she had done, and not being able to prove the contrary anyway. The speaker waited, then she then pointed out, that when you have someone giving a ridiculous argument in a way that can not be proved, there is nothing you can say to that will support the truth without doubt. Holocaust deniers are like this, as are those who throw slander about (note - she was doing this to make a point).
One can pull segments from the bible out of context of violence, carnage, incest, and all the rest. This certainly does not mean that either the old or new testament teach those who read it to go by these examples. So, I have not answered Brendan's challenge to me about dashing children's heads on a rock and rejoicing in the Psalm he mentioned. I don't pretend to know how each historical instance or quote got into either testament. No one believes that the entire texts are not written by men. Therefore, no one should be impressed if unusual verses come out of it in a violent way.
As to your rebutting them in a thread, Don.....why bother? A few examples on the meaning of ancient texts, and how taking things out of context changes the meaning are enough for me. I am just not sure why you need to take your leave. Your topics were well received, and you fulfilled one of the main objectives of those who wish to express PUL, which is giving assistance and showing the way. Lets not forget the posting here is not just for our own private searching, but our thoughts may assist others (and their thoughts may assist us).
Pesonally, I am for deleting any antichristian threads, and moving on with you still on board, Don.
Matthew
|