Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print
ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions (Read 38146 times)
Rob Calkins
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 260
Denver
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #30 - Jan 23rd, 2007 at 2:21pm
 
There is an interesting article on amnesia and memory loss in today’s NY Times.  Here’s the link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/23/health/psychology/23amne.html

The article suggests the hippocampus plays a mediating role in structuring memory.  Perhaps there is some equivalent in the afterlife.  Without this function, memory is fragmented and “barren of personal dimension”.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #31 - Jan 24th, 2007 at 12:24am
 
Thanks for the many replies.  In general, posters just seem to downplay ES's astral insights into memory loss on the higher planes.  I don't see how you can ignore ES's superior verifications and the support his insights derive from Robert Bruce, George Ritchie, and Classical Channeling.  Memory loss on the higher planes nicely explains the rarity of ADCs after a year since the death. I would doubt my own unverified experiences first.  In any case, I will begin by replying to a comment by recoverer:

[recoverer:] "Since you mentioned Betty Eadie, in one of her books she states that the advantage we have over demonic beings, is that they can't read our minds.  If she is correct,  ...how could such a being trick us into believing that we're communicating with a deceased loved one, if they can't even read our minds.  She stated that they determine if a person is somebody who can be influenced by looking at their aura.
____________________________________________________________________

Betty's first book describes her NDE, but I don't think she makes your claim there.   I suspect that this claim represents her reflection on her NDE rather than what her guides told her, but I could be wrong.  In any case, whatever demons know about us prior to the possession process, once that process begins, they get to know us better than we know ourselves.   Malachi Martin discovers this by being present at several major exorcisms.  For example, in one case, the exorcist team was led by a respected elderly priest.  His young assistants were shocked by the first words that came out of the demoniac's mouth: "Well, if it isn't Peter the Eater!"  When these words were uttered, the old priest must have blushed.  "Peter the Eater" was a dirty nickname his former girlfiriend had given him several decades ago during his misspent youth.   By shouting this nickname, the demon took temporary cnntrol of the session because the priest's young assistants were curious about the meaning of the expression. 

And what is the most coomon cause of demonic possession?  Psychiatrist M. Scott Peck has researched this subject.  Peck concludes: "It seems clear from the literature on possesssion that the majority of cases have had involvement with the occult ("People of the Lie," p. 190)."

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
I Am Dude
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1462
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #32 - Jan 24th, 2007 at 12:39am
 
Quote:
In general, posters just seem to downplay ES's astral insights into memory loss on the higher planes.  I don't see how you can ignore ES's superior verifications and the support his insights derive from Robert Bruce, George Ritchie, and Classical Channeling.  Memory loss on the higher planes nicely explains the rarity of ADCs after a year since the death.


I acknowledge the fact that memory loss occurs, just as probably everyone else who has posted.  What we are trying to say is that it would be very odd and almost retarded that we would loose our memory for good.  Don, do you believe that we are doomed to permanent memory loss?  If so, can you pleas address the points I made in my previos post in (1)? Did Swedenborg ever say that the memory loss was permanent?  Does Robert Bruce say that the memory loss is permanent?(I truely do not know)  Doesn't this seem to contradict life and existance as we know it?  Doesn't it feel wrong to you?  Or are all of your beliefs simply based off others "verifications?"
Back to top
 

But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be added unto you.
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #33 - Jan 24th, 2007 at 1:17am
 
No, Dude, I answer your question in reply #13.  ES discovers that we have an inner and an outer memory.  The outer memory becomes dormant on higher planes and thus creates a sense of forgetfulness.  But the inner memory remains intact, obviously to be restored at a certain point for certain purposes.

“Since the natural objects that reside in our memory cannot be reproduced in a spiritual world, they become dormant the way they do when we are not thinking about them.  Even so, they can be reproduced when it so pleases the Lord (Swedenborg, HH #461).”  

So the question is: under what circumstances does God restore our memory.  Classical Channeling suggests that souls experience a more in depth past life review in widely separated phases, when we are ready.  We then get to experience the emotions of the people we impacted by our words and deeds.  I suggest that this unique period of attunement might be achieved by direct contact with the spirits of these people.  Parts of this past life review might be the setting for rare ADCs long after our loved one's passing.   But special permission for memory restoration might be granted on other grounds yet to be determined.  I am looking for a pattern of soul evolution that might help explain the rarity and yet the reality of ADCs that occur many years after our loved one's death.

Don
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2007 at 5:05pm by Berserk »  
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #34 - Jan 24th, 2007 at 6:22pm
 
Roger,

This post has been primarily created for your reflection.  You are troubled by the rarity of ADCs with "physical" credentials as impressive as Leonard's contact with his son. Jeff, and daughter-in-law, Karen.  I think it is a mistake to use a preconceived theology or metaphysic as a foundation and then reject impressive evidence that fails to fit this paradigm.  Rather, one should adjust one's preconceptions to fit initially disconcerting implications of good evidence.  So I will present 12 factors that might help explain the rarity of ADCs of the highest calibre.  In my view, these 12 factors make it expedient to bow before the many mysteries until better concrete evidence is discovered.   These factors might also serve as a useful grid for your more concrete reflections.

(1) The Frequency of ADCs:
As already noted, one study found that 50% of Americans and 48% of the British report astral contact with newly dcceased loved ones within the first year of  their passing. These ADCs are very reassuring to the recipients.  It seems likely that the newly deceased care more about whether their contact comforts their bereaved loved ones than about whether its quality of its verification rivals the sheer “physicality” of Leonard’s ADC.  Such higher-level ADCs may be harder to master without the help of an advanced guide or angel.

(2) Lack of Permission:  
The newly deceased may not be capable of creating ADCs with the impressive “physicality” of Leonard’s experience on their own initiative.  They may need special permission from angels or saintly guides.  Thus, Leonard’s deceased son Jeff  regretfully informed his Dad: “I’m sorry, Dad, I’m not PERMITTED to drive any further.”  On what basis is this permission granted?  Obviously, permission to create ADCs this impressive is not routinely granted to comfort the bereaved.  Perhaps, one reason for rare exceptions is the sudden premature death of a young family before they had a chance to fulfill their destinies.  But even this is not sufficient grounds for an exception.  Permission may also require the satisfaction of conditions like (3)-(9) below, which seem particularly applicable to the lower planes and the earlier stages of postmortem orientation.    

(3) The Issue of the Bereaved’s  Psychic Attunement with the Newly Deceased
     Loved One:
During my death vigil with Carol (cancer), I discerned that she would quickly verify her smooth transition to the next life and I urged those present to anticipate an ADC.  One might assume that she would contact her two sons and her girlfriend Cathy who quit her job to take care of Carol for 4 months. Instead, she has to date only contacted her boyfriend Chet. The day after her funeral, Chet heard a loud woman’s voice in his house shout his name so loudly that the house shook and objects rattled.  No one else was around.  Why would Carol contact Chet and not her sons and loyal girlfriend?   Besides Carol, only Chet’s family had experienced the paranormal.  The others were left-brained skeptics about such phenomena.  I think Carol tried to contact her other loved ones, but failed due to a lack of psychic attunement which is different from love.   .  

(4) The Issue of the Psychic Aptitude of the Bereaved:
Quite apart from the psychic attunment between the bereaved and his deceased loved one, exceptional psychic gifts may enhance the likelihood of experiencing more spectacular ADCs like Leonard’s.  Leonard seems to have been naturally psychic and had experienced other paranormal experiences apart from his ADC.

The premonition of a spiritually gifted Methodist missionary to India, Dr. E. Stanley Jones, poignantly illustrates this issue.  Jones was seheduled to be a key-note speaker at a Christian missionary conference in Dehli.  He was patiently waiting in a long ticket line at an Indian airport, when he suddenly heard an inner voice: "Get out of line now!”  Jones initially dismissed this voice
as his own paranoia.  But as he drew near the front of the line, the inner voice returned and became more insistent and repetitive.   Finally, an embarrassed Jones left the line.  He began to worry that the conference hosts would consider his excuse childishly paranoid.  Well, the plane crashed, killing several hundred Indian passengers, mostly Hindus.   When the Indian press heard about his premonition, they besieged him with impertinent questions: e. g. “So, Dr. Jones, are you saying that God loved you more than all those Hindus?  Did God warn you just because you are a Christian, but allowed hnndreds of Hindus to die with no warning?”  Jones replied softly, “Oh no, I’m sure that God loves those Hindu victims at least as much as He loves me.  It’s just that I’m the only one who could listen to His voice.”  

What do I infer from this amazing paranormal  incident?  Jones was a devout man of prayer and meditation.  His spiritual discplines allowed him to tune in to his clairvoyance and save his life.  The Hindus booked on this fatal flight lacked his spiritual gifts.  God normally expects us to develop our own gifts just as He expects us to make scientific and medical discoveries through our own research.  God’s “hands-off” policy is motivated by respect for our free will and His desire that we create our own culture, technologies, and disciplines.  

(5) Lack of ADC Instruction in the Early Stages of Postmortem Life:
God’s “hands off” policy may explain the limited priorities of the guides who greet the newly dead.  The guides of the newly dead may be almost exclusively focussed on the adjustment process of the new arrivals rather than on the longing of bereaved loved ibes for reassuring contact.  

(6) The Issue of Limiting Beliefs about the Possibility of ADCs:
Suppose a man dies who was never really open to ADCs during his life.  His limiting beliefs may prevent him from aggressively seeking out mothods of ADC contact.

(7) The Problem of Self-Absorption:
For many, the early stages of postmortem adjustment may be so traumatic or engaging that ADC contact with the bereaved may be a low priority.  These new arrivals may get caught up in reunions with deceased friends and family members.  Perhaps new arrivals are often assured that  there is no need to contact their bereaved loved ones.  

(8) The Problem of Disorientation in Adjusting to the Afterlife:
Many people die of long debilitating illness and cross over, very disoriented.  They often need a prolonged stay in a rehabilitation center.  During their long convalesence, they may have neither the ability nor the inclination to try to contact their bereaved loved ones.

(9) The Impossibility of Contacting the Living from Certain Spirit Planes:
An OBE adept named Claire points out that ADCs are not even possible from certain lower spirit planes.

(10) Loss of Earth Memory in the Higher Spirit Planes:
Swedenborg discovers that earth memory becomes dormant in the higher astral levels.  This amnesia seems to be a key to explaining why ADCs are so rare after the first year of the loved one’s passing.  But ES concedes that earth memory is occasionally restored “when it so pleases the Lord (HH #461).”  One example of this memory restoration is the more comprehensive past life review.  This review forces each soul to experience life from the point of view of those his life impacted.   In various widely separated stages, the soul experiences the emotional reactions of others in his life.  


(11) The Danger of ADCs to Deceased Loved Ones from Higher Planes:
In my initial post, I challenged claims that channeling at its best can put us in touch with our deceased loved ones.  But assume for the sake of argument that I am mistaken.  The best of classical channeling agrees with R. Bruce’s insights about the formidable barriers to successful retrievals from hellish planes:  Advanced souls may find it very difficult to cope with the spiritual vibration of lower spiritual planes through which they must pass to reach the earth plane.  

Consider, for example, what Paul Beard reports in his enthralling  book, "Living On: How Consciousness Continues and Evolves After Death:"

“To enter these areas fills rescuers with a deep sense of distress; these helpers, sensitive men and women, can themselves become affected and drawn into some of the purblind emotions they seek to lift from others, and if they remain too long in this area they declare they can, to some extent, be temporarily overcome by them.  For the price to be paid in order to reach these minds is to lower their own consciousness and concepts to a level acceptable to, and capable of being understood by, those they hope to rescue.  Evil is powerful at its own level, and clearly a rescuer needs sterner qualities than those of the self-congratulatory do-gooder (88-89).”

One of the most memorable posters on this AK board was a fellow who had just mastered the OBE state.  He was reluctant to continue his exploration because of terrifying experiences he had when he descended to the lower planes.   He said he was overwhelmed by the toxic atmosphere and could barely resist succumbing to its hypnotic pressure to perform evil acts consistent with the defining purpose of those particular planes.  His negative experiences independently corroborate the revelations of the mediums reported by Beard.

(12) The Indirect Danger of ADCs to the Earthly Recipient:
Advanced souls in the heavens may have other good reasons for their reluctance to try to contact earthly loved ones.  For example, they may be well aware of the cunning role of spirit impersonators from lower planes and the potential dangers they represent to surviving loved ones.  Advanced souls may not want to encourage their earthly loved ones to open their naive spirits to such deceptive spirit contamination and its dangers.

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rondele
Ex Member


Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #35 - Jan 25th, 2007 at 1:12pm
 
Don-

Thanks for your thoughtful reply to my post.  These are just my initial reactions.

Let me clarify- I do not reject the story about Leonard.  Nothing I said was to indicate a rejection.  To repeat, the point I was making was to raise the obvious question as to why this rare, magnificent event was given to Leonard when countless millions of others are, for whatever reason, denied a similar reaffirming experience.  And I do not agree with you that Leonard's story is evidentiary in nature.  I think we have to be extremely rigorous in what we call evidence or verification.   

Having said that, let me comment on your 12 Factors.

(1).  I don't know that there's any shortage of advanced guides or angels.  If so, then perhaps that's why such cases are so rare.  But that's something we are only guessing about.

(2).  N/C

(3).  Yes, but surely of the many millions who die on a regular basis, there should be far more cases like Leonard's.  Psychic attunement cannot be that tightly woven as to exclude 99.9% of the rest of us.

(4).  Same point as (3).

(5).  This is a supposition.  Perhaps it's true but who's to say?

(6).  Same comment as (5).

(7).  Yes, but statistically there should be far more experiences of the Leonard nature.

(8).  Yes, but many people also die of sudden causes just as Jeff and Karen did.  In fact, this gets to Factor 7....one would think that those who die suddenly, such as a plane crash, would be those LEAST likely to appear in this type ADC.  Rather, they would require psychic attention from helpers or guides for adjustment to their unexpected environment.

(9).  There must be millions of folks like Jeff and Karen who DO transition to an appropriate spirit plane for ADC contact.

(10).  Again, this doesn't explain why Leonard's story is so rare and unique.  I'm not disputing ES, but the numbers just don't add up.

(11).  Let's assume that all of your other points are valid.  Even then, Karen and Jeff were allowed to appear in physical form for the express reason of giving comfort to Leonard and allowing him to get on with his life.  Let's also assume that all parties to this story were spiritually advanced and attuned.  But so are countless others.

(12).  Well, apparently someone decided that there was no such danger in allowing this type of ADC contact.  In fact, one could also argue that what Leonard saw was not really Karen and Jeff.  I imagine if ES were alive today, he might warn us not to be too hasty in making solid conclusions as to what Leonard experienced.

Is there any way we can find out about other cases like Leonard in the ADC/afterlife literature?  I have read many ADC accounts but nothing along these lines.  Materializaton of angels, yes, but not the deceased.






Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #36 - Jan 25th, 2007 at 1:31pm
 
Don:


Regarding the below, "the occult" is quite a broad term. Going by what I heard, Martin Mallaci's book tends to indicate that people get effected when they dabble in dark things like black magic. You wrote something similar once.  You also said that people sometimes get effected when they over do speaking in toungues. Would M. Scott Peck consider something such as going out of body to be occult? Or what if a person prays to God and asks for divine guidance? Should they expect that only a demon will answer them?





Berserk wrote on Jan 24th, 2007 at 12:24am:
And what is the most coomon cause of demonic possession?  Psychiatrist M. Scott Peck has researched this subject.  Peck concludes: "It seems clear from the literature on possesssion that the majority of cases have had involvement with the occult ("People of the Lie," p. 190)."

Don

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #37 - Jan 25th, 2007 at 1:41pm
 
Regarding the below, being able to read a person's mind and knowing something about their past isn't the same thing as really knowing them. For example, the elderly priest probably had a pure heart.  Could something such as a demon see this purity clear enough to understand it, or would it be limited like a lower realm being who has a misunderstanding of reincarnation?

I doubt that something such as a demon could understand my devotion to God and God's way. If it could, it wouldn't be demon.  If it told me something about my past, I'd ask it to explain my love for God.

I don't mean to suggest that there isn't a such thing as negative minded spirits who try to mislead people. I believe people should be careful if they make contact with the World of spirit. They shouldn't be gullible. The same is true when it comes to what they read. For example, the numerous contradictory channelled sources of information.



[quote author=Berserk link=1168058488/30#31 date=1169612640]  In any case, I will begin by replying to a comment by recoverer:

[recoverer:] "Since you mentioned Betty Eadie, in one of her books she states that the advantage we have over demonic beings, is that they can't read our minds.  If she is correct,  ...how could such a being trick us into believing that we're communicating with a deceased loved one, if they can't even read our minds.  She stated that they determine if a person is somebody who can be influenced by looking at their aura.
____________________________________________________________________

Betty's first book describes her NDE, but I don't think she makes your claim there.   I suspect that this claim represents her reflection on her NDE rather than what her guides told her, but I could be wrong.  In any case, whatever demons know about us prior to the possession process, once that process begins, they get to know us better than we know ourselves.   Malachi Martin discovers this by being present at several major exorcisms.  For example, in one case, the exorcist team was led by a respected elderly priest.  His young assistants were shocked by the first words that came out of the demoniac's mouth: "Well, if it isn't Peter the Eater!"  When these words were uttered, the old priest must have blushed.  "Peter the Eater" was a dirty nickname his former girlfiriend had given him several decades ago during his misspent youth.   By shouting this nickname, the demon took temporary cnntrol of the session because the priest's young assistants were curious about the meaning of the expression.  

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 25th, 2007 at 8:56pm by recoverer »  
 
IP Logged
 
Rob Calkins
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 260
Denver
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #38 - Jan 25th, 2007 at 3:00pm
 
Thanks Recoverer for mentiioning M Scott Peck.  I've been trying to remember his name for the past few days and here it is.  Also, another book question (sorry I'm not on topic):  years ago I read a book called The Betty Book that dealt with afterlife knowledge.  The author (Betty I assume) wrote several books but I think these were in the early 20th century.  I wonder if it's the same Betty. Thanks - Rob
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #39 - Jan 25th, 2007 at 3:03pm
 
Rob:

I'd say your welcome, except that  Don was the first to mention the M Scott Peck book.


Rob Calkins wrote on Jan 25th, 2007 at 3:00pm:
Thanks Recoverer for mentiioning M Scott Peck.  I've been trying to remember his name for the past few days and here it is.  Also, another book question (sorry I'm not on topic):  years ago I read a book called The Betty Book that dealt with afterlife knowledge.  The author (Betty I assume) wrote several books but I think these were in the early 20th century.  I wonder if it's the same Betty. Thanks - Rob

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rob Calkins
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 260
Denver
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #40 - Jan 25th, 2007 at 4:23pm
 
Thanks Don.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #41 - Jan 26th, 2007 at 5:08pm
 
Roger, I know your comments on reply #34 were provisional  I hope my retorts will stimulate your further reflection.  

(1) The Frequency of ADCs:
One study found that 50% of Americans and 48% of the British report astral contact with newly dcceased loved ones within the first year of their passing. These ADCs are very reassuring to the recipients.  It seems likely that the newly deceased care more about whether their contact comforts their bereaved loved ones than about whether the quality of its verification rivals the sheer “physicality” of Leonard’s ADC.  Such higher-level ADCs may be harder to master without the help of an advanced guide or angel.

[Roger:] “I don’t now that there’s a shortage of advanced guides or angels.”
_____________________________________________________
The issue is not the shortage of “advanced guides,” but (a) whether the newly dead have a mandate to create the most spectacular ADCs on demand and (b) whether they are normally content to contact the bereaved in a comforting, if less spectacular, manner.  The 50% who experience such ADCs generally seem to find them a great comfort.  So why are spectacular ADCs even necessary?  Besides, how do you know how rare spectacular ADCs are?  Like many others, Leonard preferred to keep his ADC private.  I had to  badger him into sharing his experience with me.  And I've read about comparable ADCs in New Age books.  More importantly, I heard about his ADC in a time when I was involved in other spectacular ADCs, which I will describe in another post.

(2) Lack of Permission:  
The newly deceased may not be capable of creating ADCs with the impressive “physicality” of Leonard’s experience on their own initiative.  They may need special permission from angels or saintly guides.  Thus, Leonard’s deceased son Jeff  regretfully informed his Dad: “I’m sorry, Dad, I’m not PERMITTED to drive any further.”  On what basis is this permission granted?   Obviously, permission to create ADCs this impressive is not routinely granted to comfort the bereaved.  Perhaps, one reason for rare exceptions is the sudden premature death of a young family before they had a chance to fulfill their destinies.  But even this is not sufficient grounds for an exception.  Permission may also require the satisfaction of conditions like the other 10 I've outlined in reply #34.  
__________________________________________________________________
Roger, you don’t comment on (2).  But (2) is by far the most crucial point.  Points (3)-(9) merely explain why spectacular ADCs ;might be so uncommon.

Very few die with a stong belief that they can spectacularly verify their survival to the bereaved.  Limiting beliefs about ADC options seem siufficent to explain the rarity of spectacular ADCs.  Indeed, limiting beliefs determine whether and how one can experience the astral realms.  The evidence from NDEs suggests that guides welcome the dead to assist their transition, not to facilitate their contact with the bereaved.  The likelihood of spectacular ADCs would surely be dramatically reduced even more by the traumatic self-absorption or disorientation of most of the newly dead,  the need for psychic attunement with the newly decesased (e. g. Carol and Chet), the need for the bereaved to have a unique psychic aptitude.  In this respect, you don’t seem to have come to terms with the rather unique evidential case of E. Stanley Jones’s premonition.  

The premonition of this spiritually gifted Methodist missionary to India poignantly illustrates this issue.  Dr. Jones was seheduled to be a key-note speaker at a Christian missionary conference in Dehli.  He was patiently waiting in a long ticket line at an Indian airport, when he suddenly heard an inner voice: "Get out of line now!”  Jones initially dismissed this voice as his own paranoia.  But as he drew near the front of the line, the inner voice returned and became more insistent and repetitive.   Finally, an embarrassed Jones left the line.  He began to worry that the conference hosts would consider his excuse childishly paranoid.  Well, the plane crashed, killing several hundred Indian passengers, mostly Hindus.   When the Indian press heard about his premonition, they besieged him with impertinent questions: e. g. “So, Dr. Jones, are you saying that God loved you more than all those Hindus?  Did God warn you just because you are a Christian, but allowed hnndreds of Hindus to die with no warning?”  Jones replied softly, “Oh no, I’m sure that God loves those Hindu victims at least as much as He loves me.  It’s just that I’m the only one who could listen to His voice.”  

ES and other astral adepts never mention that ADC Instructions are issued in the early stages of postmortem transition.  Yet NDEs and especially ES often describe this transitional state in great detail.  So why assume that such instruction must routinely be available then react skeptically when it bocomes apparent that no such ADC instructions are available in the transitional state?

(10) Loss of Earth Memory in the Higher Spirit Planes:
Swedenborg discovers that earth memory becomes dormant in the higher astral levels.  This amnesia seems to be a key to explaining why ADCs are so rare after the first year of the loved one’s passing.  But ES concedes that earth memory is occasionally restored “when it so pleases the Lord (HH #461).”  One example of this memory restoration is the more comprehensive past life review.  This review forces each soul to experience life from the point of view of those his life impacted.   In various widely separated stages, the soul experiences the emotional reactions of others in his life.

{Roger:]  “This doesn’t explain why Leonard’s so story is so rare and unique.”
______________________________________________________________-_
I beg to differ.   You probably can’t create an ADC if you can barely recall your earth life!  And in those few occasions when you are permitted to remember (e. g. the phased empathetic past life review), there is no guarantee that this permission is extended to create a highly “physical” ADC. Indeed, the dangers of “descent” and later spirit impersonation might explain why such permission is rarely granted.   Remember, the basic issue is the logical coherence of the evidence, not just its probative value.  Remaining mysteries don't amount to a refutation of impressive evidence.

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #42 - Jan 27th, 2007 at 11:46pm
 
When discarnate loved ones are permitted to communicate with us, how might they cope with the danger of being infected by the negative vibration of lower planes?   In our world, there seem to he two basic ways of esploring distant locales non-physically--remote viewing and OBEs (or its variation, astral projection).  OBE adept, Robert Bruce apparently discovers how astral doctors and nurses employ a form of remote viewing to staff astral hospitals without being infected by the lower vibration:  .Robert observes:
 
“The doctors and nurses that staff and run these astral hospitals do not appear to be quite real....So far I have not been able to strike up anything resembling a meaningful conversation with any of them.  They seem to be very two-dimensional in nature.”

The two-dimensional nature of these doctors and nurses contrasts with Robert’s experience of the very real relatives who "descend" from higher planes to visit newly deceased loved ones.  These relatives seem very real to Robert but have impaired memories of their earth life.

How this astral remote viewing might work is described by the famous deceased
parapsychologist, F. W. Myers, in a message channeled throuigh a distnguished medium:

“I have to concentrate my thought for what you might call a moment and I can build up a likeness of myself, send that likeness speeding...to a friend, to one that is in tune with me.  Instantly I appear before that friend, though I am more remote from him, and my likeness holds speech--in thought, remember, not words--with this friend.  Yet all the time I control it...and as soon as the interview is concluded I withdraw the life of my thought from that image of myself and it vanishes (from Paul Beard's "Living On, " 69)."

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rondele
Ex Member


Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #43 - Jan 28th, 2007 at 2:43pm
 
Hi again Don-

I guess I didn't respond to (2) because, as you pointed out, permission was really the predicate for fulfillment of the other factors.  Sorry.

In any case, do you know of any compilation of ADCs of this nature?  If so, I'd love to know about it.  Without question, it's a rare occurrence.

The Leonard case triggered a memory of mine dating many years ago.  I was listening to the radio, and the TV actor Telly Savalas was talking about an incident where he saw and talked with someone who had been dead for several years.  Try as I could, I was not able to recall the specific circumstances so I chose not to mention it.

Lo and behold, and thanks to google, here is what I found.  It's a remarkable case, and even more so since I heard Savalas himself describe it, so it's not just a second-hand account.  FYI, I had entered Telly Savalas Ghost in the search engine.  You will find other accounts but this one is the most complete.

http://www.underworldtales.com/telly.htm

Now, we have a case where not only the deceased had been dead longer than a year, but the car in which he was driving when he was killed and which was demolished, materialized along with him.  If true, and I have to say I was impressed by the sincerity in Savalas' voice when he described it, it raises even more questions about the afterlife.  Pretty amazing, huh?

Roger
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: ADCs vs. Momory Loss: 7 Questions
Reply #44 - Jan 29th, 2007 at 12:48am
 
Roger,

Thanks for posting the web account of Telly Savalas's ADC.  It is the most impressive web reference ever offered on this site.  I have not seen "Kojak" for many years.  Yet, coincidentally, just before I was about to create this post, I felt an impulse to turn on my TV, and there was Telly Savalas!  Telly's and Leonard's ADC lend each other credibility because both men are chauffeured in a vehicle driven by a discarnate human. 

I will bring my active participation in this thread to an end with this post and one more.  In this post, I will quote two ADC reports with which you are familiar.  I want you to reread them and ask yourself whether their sheer "physicality" is not somewhat reminiscent of Telly's and Leonard's ADCs.

(1) After his NDE, Howard Storm became fascinated with the books of Catholic mystic, Thomas Merton.  He and his new pastor (Bill Crawford) decided to drive to Merton's trappist Abbey of Gethsemane, Kentucky to visit Merton's grave.

"The monk then directed us to the grave of Thomas Merton, who was known as Father Louis in the monastery, and he left us alone.  Bill sat on a bench while I prayed on my knees by the resting place of Father Louis.  I was crying because I felt his presence near me when suddenly a young man appeared by my side.  He was wearing a sweatshirt and blue jeans.  He handed me a book of Thomas Merton's poetry open to a poem titled `The Cemetery at Gethsemane.'  When I read the poem, I understood that Thomas Merton had felt the presence of the saints buried there." 

"I gave the book back to the young man, closed my eyes, and said a brief prayer of thanks.  When I opened my eyes the young man was gone.  I was surprised because in the enclosed area of the cemetery there was nowhere for him to go.  I looked around, but he had vanished.  Confused, I went over to Bill, who sat facing toward me thirty feet away, and asked if he had seen the young man with the book.  Bill said he had been watching me pray.  He said, `The man appeared from nowhere, handed me the book, waited while I read the poem, took the book from me, and vanished.'  I asked him if he was certain.  He assured me he was.  Later, when I was looking at photographs of Thomas Merton, I saw a picture of him when he was in his early twenties.  He looked just like the young man in the cemetery!...The spirit of Thomas Merton had visited me and consoled me at his grave (Howard Storm, "My Descent into Death," pp. 118-119)."

(2) My second example is taken from the amazing book you mailed me written by Howell Vincent, a Presbyterian minister  Howell recounts an encounter that he and 4 family members had with his deceased ex-wife, Nellie:

On at least two occasions this radiant mother had come to [her daughter] Rea in VISIBLE, TANGIBLE form and talked with her...I was privileged to be present at one of these heavenly visits by Mother Nellie.  Together with Rea I talked with Nelly, fully recognizing her face and form and voice.  I saw her place her hand on Rea's head in blessing, and I saw her give Rea a flowet, a calendula, WHICH WE PRESSED AND KEPT.  At that time three other members of our family were present, including Rea's second mother, Agnes, and they all saw Nellie and talked with her, as Rea and I did.  We were all wide awake and walked around the room with Nellie ("Lighted Passage," p. 25)."

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.