spooky2 wrote on Jan 7th, 2007 at 10:38pm:Yes Steve, like you I'm really tired of these endless repeated statements, mostly with the underlaying tone of "I am one of the modern, knowing intellectuals and scientists" about the "simple truth" that we're made of physical bodies and that was it. This is not scientific at all. We may speculate why this opinion is sort of forced in the media (at least in some countries).
To put it in a "box of logic", as you said, your example has a lack, because it is still an inner-material-world example- some will say "yes, see, you need a hard drive, but when it's broken the data are gone." So I like more to point out that experiences of every kind are simply not brain structures. You can't find experiences in the brain. You can stimulate the brain, and find experiences which go along with it, so there can be found correlations, but to take this and state that brain structures and their dynamics ARE experiences, to identificate it, is an invalid conclusion. And it's simply different categories which can't be identified anyway.
Spooky
No, I didn't expect that to be a perfect example.
For example, I can tell you all I want, what a strawberry WILL taste like, but until you eat one, the experience won't reach the senses.