Bruce Moen
|
Dude,
Congratulations on what I see as your successful attempt to get verification. While it's true that alternative explanations exist for your experience, just because they exist does not automatically make them any more likely than the possibility that you actually made contact and communicated with the grandfather.
I remember a time, not that many years ago, when scientists were convinced that any evidence for something like telepathy was just coincidence, lucky guesses, or fraud. Now days enough scientific studies have been done to prove the existence of telepathy to science. So I find it amusing that now many scientists claim that afterlife communication does not exist, it is just telepathy with the physically living. It is very difficult to convince scientists that anything new exists since if a phenomena can be explained away by existing knowledge, science is biased to do so. This is as it should be, I believe, otherwise too much belief-based junk would become accepted as real. Time will tell. As more evidence is gathered, as more scientists become brave enough to devise more certain methods of testing the survival of consciousness hypothesis, the truth will be known.
In any event there are two ways the "it's only telepathy hypothesis" is routinely disproved in the experiences of participants in the live workshop. In the first the deceased person died so many years ago, sometimes thousands, that no physically living person exists whose mind could be telepathically mined for the verified information received. In the second the information was a secret known only to the deceased person. Telepathy cannot be used to explain away verified information gathered from the deceased in these cases.
Oh, about skewing the first word. From my experience this is a function of how our perception actually works. What you are dealing with is called "Interpreter Overlay" in the Afterlife Knowledge Guidebook, the process you describe is a textbook example of the effects and dealing with Interpreter Overlay.
From the live workshop exercise in which people make routinely gather previously unknown information via contact and communication with a deceased person there are two things you might add to your sessions.
1. Ask the deceased person to show you or tell you about a physical lifetime scene that both they and the person who asked you to make contact were in together and would both remember.
2. Ask the deceased person to show you, tell you, of give you something to be proving that your experience with them is real.
From my experience and that of workshop participants I'd say that if you continue making contact with the intent to gather information proving our afterlife's existence, eventually the weight of the verificable evidence will crush all doubt.
For me the verification step is so very impaortant because each time our experience is verified as real our acceptance of it as real causes beliefs we hold that conflict with that reality to be chipped away. Those beliefs, in my view serve to block, distort, color and overlay our perception. With each verification the pootential exists to eliminate and remove those beliefs, and in doing so our perception becomes more clear, undistorted, etc. This in turn leads to clearer perception of more such information and we enter into a process that leads to opening our perception to an ever expanding perspective beyond physical reality.
Bruce
|