dave_a_mbs
Super Member
   
Offline

Afterlife Knowledge Member
Posts: 1655
central california
Gender:
|
Hi BD- I think I'm somewhere between Chumley and Doc. In my work a lot of people that I have never met (in this life) come to me and want past life regressions. In general I make it a point not to lead, so I ask open ended questions, like, "Where do you feel that you are?" or "Do you recognize anyone?" The typical result is that most people seem to have no memory, or no important memory that they want to talk about from their previous childhood, but somewhere around puberty it kicks in. Then they have one or two experiences that they recall. These experiences are always significant events that stand out above the humdrum daily routine of living. For example, nobody ever tells me that they remember breathing or eating, but they definitely remark on being suffocated or starved, or one case in which the woman had a full blown heart attack and insisted on direct somatic recall of the whole thing.
I occasionally have had people who could regress and discuss a lot of the things that had happened intheir prio life. Usually they are reasonable things, and stand out because they altered the daily rythm by a small amount. An example is a farm wife who goes to the store once every two or three months. In one case I took extensive geographical and decriptive notes. Then I went to a map and tried to locate her. It was imposible. There simply was no identical place.
This gives me the impression that we retain experiences by somehow building them into our psyche, much as a river retains its experiences of flooding by shifting its banks. The really significant things that we do evidently carry a karmic charge. These seem to be easily recalled, like flying off a motorcycle through a window or whatever. These are typically events that define the nature of the individual.
As an analogy, consider an electron. In principle, its radiated lines of electrical charge go off in all dirctions until they reach the ends of the universe. Thus a motion of the electron alters its relationships by which embedding in spacetime occurs. If we could discover all the lines of charge emitted, and trace them all the way to their ends, we should be able to describe the history of the electron through the relationships it has had.
In much the same way, it seems that events alter the lines of relationship through which our embedding in psychic spacetime occurs. For us, however, our definition is hooked onto those lines of relationship, so in principle we should be able to look at the way we are embedded in reality, and then from that discover the way in which we have experienced reality. This kind of thinking means that karmic issues are embedded in us, and are not imposed by externals. The routine stuff would fade way because it has no special nature, we are generally alike with respect to routine things, just like one electron resembles another. But when we do some significant thing that alters our definition, by rearranging the manner in which we and the world relate to one another, then it seems that this stands out and can be recovered.
The next obvious question is what is all the other stuff. (a) What about all the details of life on the farm, or whatever. (b) What about the personally relevant material?
I suggest that the "life on the farm" routine material is mostly "filler". It carries the same meanings as would the actual experiences, but there is nothing to make it stand out, so the mind simply uses a generic description.
For the personal details, my personal opinion is that the person is able to read the mind of those who are present. In this sense, I would not say that material was forgotten, but that the unimportant details are lost, and only the important connections remain. These are evidently readily identified when in the spirit world, since love is eternal, and many other strong emotions are moderately stable and enduring. As an example, I occasionally ask, "Do you know anybody who is in that group?" If the reply is indefinite, I add, "Look into their eyes and see." Then there is sometimes a recollection, "Oh yes. That is my neighbor in this life." or some such thing.
The greatest difficulty with past life work seems to be the fantastic difficulty of getting reproducible results in which the place, time and activities can be traced exactly, My suggestion is that this is simply because most of the time, the stuff was trivial, and a lot was filled in with generics. BUT - and this is important - I may be dead wrong.
Incidently - if there is anyone who is truly interested in working in this area, I have about 300 hours of VHS recordings of past life regressions (with permissions) that might be useful for a content analysis. Maybe that would clarify some of these ideas. PUL dave
|