spooky2
|
I find Dave's posts terrific, it matches so much with my considerations about my meditations. I guess everyone who meditates and has reportable experiences has to deal at some point of time with what is reality and how are these experiences are fitting in reality. Of course, every experience as experience is real...and there is this saying, what we imaginate is reality for us. So when we leave the physical, there is the possibility that what we imaginate is to full degree our one and only reality (this does not say anything about interaction with others, but it may be that "others" becomes a term without meaning), which is a fascinating, but also can-be-frightening outlook, so it's naturally to build frames for oneself automatically depending on everyone's personality, so we might meet at some "logical corner" in the all that exists.
So BRAVI, there are a lot of books about how it is without having a physical body, and some are telling about a very similar world like our physical, but with less limitations, and it seems to depend on the degree of freedom one is willing to agree to, and the degree of depending on forms and limits.
Evolver, I've found that surprisingly the "I" doesn't vanish, I can push me as high or deep as I want in meditation; but what you perceive, what you ask and what makes sense to you is changing. The resulting theory I built from that is that the "I" does never vanish because it depends not on the single personality which one is now, it's possible to melt with others and anything, and the "I" remains, it's one with much more experiences and knowledge, but it is still your "I"- as well as mine. One "I" in the universe is enough to serve all persons. It's like you were a child, a different person than now, but also the same "I", isn't it?
Spooky
|