Lucy
|
Hi yeah I find his first book very challenging, haven't read the second.
He...or rather his compatriots there...state that this material is different. I don't think you can say "just an illusion" because it is hard to get to a point where you can see behind the illusion. What intrigues me is that the illusion they are talking about is obviously one that continues into the afterlife. You don't die and then just "get it."
They talk about reality being just a dream and then they talk about the choice to either perfect the dream or move beyond it. How can you know if it is correct?
One thing that made me sad was the idea that we can't really fix all the problems because the system is meant to make more problems.
The problem is, there are things in that book that I thought before all by my little old self, and that makes it difficult to disregard the things that I don't understand or think sound appealing.
What do you think of the idea that conciousness created all of this reality ina big bang moment? What about the idea that the Buddha reached the level of mind but not of God? How could Pursah have been a victim of false claims of sexual abuse at a later time in history; doesn't that stuff get better? What do you think of the sci-fi twist on time in the story, with Pursah only going forward in spiritual development because of the book, but the book wouldn't have been written if a spiritually evolved Pursah didn't contact Gary (feels like looking at some of Escher's work!) What questions do you have specifically?
too many questions!
|