augoeideian wrote on Jun 27th, 2006 at 5:51am:i got your point Spooky - did you get my point?
Can anyone make a seed, such as an acorn, and have it grow into an oak? Or make a protein containing 50,000 atoms such as are produced in the living human body, or hormones in apea-sized structure, as the pituitary gland and have these hormones regulate life process. The atheist sciencist thinks he can because he thinks the process of creation is simple and says 'the atoms came together by themselves, for in such a way did man come into existence: out of the primeval BOOM, the primeval mists condensed into vapours, then to water, then to solid earth, and somehow along the way, a simple amino acid was formed, then a cell, a living cell! And this cell's progeny finally developed into man'. Now, where did i miss the point as to how the amino acid became living? Or how was life added to the cell? And who formed the primeval mists and BOOM? Did the primeval mists form themselves? Hardly
Scientists say 'mutations are the very source of genetic variability, and so they are ultimately responsible for the evolution of all present forms of life' the idea persists that if a chemist is able to produce an amino acid or any other substance, that life is created thereby. They miss a point; In order to have life, etheric formative forces must interpenetrate the material, organising it, forming it and sustaining it. Since scientists know nothing about such forces, it is inconceivable that they will be able to intelligently create such forces to interpenetrate their chemical creations in the right way. That does not mean, however, that certain entities cannot enter and make use of what man brings about on earth.
Interesting, this conversation. Because they can't proove a soul in a living creature, they assume it doesn't excist. They can't make it visible, measure it's energy or anything else.
Another point where science needs PROOF to addapt any idea of spiritual energy.
Home
Pages: 
