Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Jesus (Read 12851 times)
Cosmic_Ambitions
Senior Member
****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 402
Jesus
May 4th, 2006 at 3:58pm
 
I was wondering what everyone's thoughts were regarding the totality of who Jesus "really" was while embodied physically... I was wondering if his grandiose soul was actually the totality of all of the souls in existence... Hence, "God's son"... If we are "all" children of God, on every planet, in every solar system, in every dimension, in everything in existence both living, non-living, and deceased... Then does it also follow... that in order for Jesus to encompass the understanding/infinite knowledge that he possessed while amongst us, that his soul must therefore have been, in essence, the totality of all of the souls in existence ad infinitum?

Also, I was wondering if any of the "other" planets within our immediate universe have had, "at some point", the same type of reported "savior" embarking/crusading upon their lands as well? Or, do other planets have a different system set up for their inhabitants... unlike that of the Earth's system?

In all curiousness,
PUL,
Cosmic_Ambitions

Back to top
 

Would there be this eternal seeking if the found existed?~Antonio Porchia&&Before enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.  After enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.~Zen Buddhist Proverb&&And remember, no matter where you go, there you are.~Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #1 - May 4th, 2006 at 4:49pm
 
good teachers ask good questions Cosmic! Cheesy

I think we all teach each other by raising questions like this and I'm glad you hang with us to get the ol noodle cranking you know!

when I think of Jesus I think of the Buddha; as one was for the east and one for the west, although Jesus lived locally in the east christianity gravitated over to the west.
I like the way you think of it, the oneness concept of all spirit, incarnated or disincarnated. is my concept also.  Studying has led me to the concept this system is a belief system planet. its what we have to work from as a basic premise, that everything is a belief and beliefs are not absolute or set in stone.

so with my disclaimer advertisement speech. lol, heres what i think. its also a duality place. I believe J might have had an ego as thats part of the set up here. Ego is not bad. ego is like self image. it is usually self serving and has a survival instinct built in; its part of your genetics to survive. ego also uses comparison values. u know you've sublimated your ego when you stop comparing yourself to others. their accomplishments, or the works they do, etc.
then you are getting beyond duality thought.
what J did is overcome duality thoughts and realized his oneness with all and so judgment belonged to what he called the Father or God.

the thing is all of us are One. So it was we who called J forth to be our savior. If we had not needed instruction he would not have been able to manifest his presence; he had to gain an ego in order to sublimate an ego and learn of, and manifest perfect, undistorted by belief system: ie: PUL.
he tried to tell us not to judge. He tried to tell us to love one another. he knew we would misinterpret, distort and write it down wrong, creating a multitude of religions as it still remains what it is, a duality, belief system planet and we must have our drama! lol. yet in the end we will end up accomplishing what he has..a state of non duality, of oneness, for his words were true, when he said "even greater things than these, that I do, will ye do also."

this was his promise and none of his promises were made in vain. it is my belief we are in those days where the promise he made will come true, as one by one our particular gifts manifest and we can really learn what perfect love is then.

Kyo explains this so much better than I, as well Hilarion does on a personal level. a word Kyo mentions "assistantiality" thats what J was doing, assisting mankind to think beyond center of the universe disease. but don't  get me wrong! lol. we come here as children to experience being the center of the universe, so I'm not judging. my child goes with me everywhere I go. and we all know how selfish children are! ha ha! so my point is theres nothing going on "wrong" here except that we believe it is wrong as we have limited C1 beliefs we guard and protect.

god, somebody stop me! hugs, just some thoughts from a past life where DP loved J soooooo much and still does! ...
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
Cosmic_Ambitions
Senior Member
****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 402
Re: Jesus
Reply #2 - May 4th, 2006 at 6:08pm
 
Thanks laffingrain, that really makes a lot of sense... I like your ideas! Smiley

laffingrain wrote:

"Studying has led me to the concept this system is a belief system planet. its what we have to work from as a basic premise, that everything is a belief and beliefs are not absolute or set in stone."

Do you think that the evolutionary systems on ***other planets*** are based on "belief systems" such as ours is?... Or do you think that their systems are something far different that we (physical Earth incarnates) have never experienced/been exposed to before?... (Maybe we have, but we just don't remember!?) Wink

Thanks for giving me the key to your thoughts! Cheesy

PUL,
Cosmic_Ambitions
Back to top
 

Would there be this eternal seeking if the found existed?~Antonio Porchia&&Before enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.  After enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.~Zen Buddhist Proverb&&And remember, no matter where you go, there you are.~Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #3 - May 4th, 2006 at 6:47pm
 
u probably like my ideas as they line up with yours Grin
Cosmic.  I have written down on "to do" list to visit other life systems and see for myself via the imagination/altered state...however, for now this here planet is taking up all my energies!
Monroe in his books, has cruised a home planet he came from where they play fun games all the time. don't know if you've read Monroe's books? he's the founder of TMI,the Monroe Institute in Virginia. As it were, he visited him home and was no longer enchanted with it. I think I understand him. It would be like constructing a heaven like place. it was like this maybe...I set out to conquer pacman..it was so fun. I was so obsessed my boyfriend walked out on me Grin this was my heaven and my challenge. (long time ago) I finally received my reward one day. a bunch of gongs and bells went off. whoopee. no more enthralling challenge. been there, done that.
heaven or a reward system as in competition was at an end. one loses ones nostalgia somehow and only forward motion matters..and they say you can't go home because home is no not the way you remembered it..

there are explorers who check out moons and planets and we had a gal name of Ginny here would do that. check the archives for Ginny. you would like what she has to say. hugs, alysia
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
Cosmic_Ambitions
Senior Member
****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 402
Re: Jesus
Reply #4 - May 4th, 2006 at 9:48pm
 
Hey laffingrain, If you do in fact visit other life systems, I'm quite interested to hear what you find if your up to sharing! Wink

I have actually read some of Monroe's books, but it has been a few years back now, so my memory is a little hazy... I do, however, find it enthralling to hear that there are other planets out there who play fun games all the time! (I wonder if they have the same neccessities as we humans do? (i.e. food, clothing, shelter, etc.... or maybe they have different forms of all of these...) (i.e. "energy balls floating in the air as a way to support nutrition/daily sustenence; maybe no clothes and no shelter because there are no adverse weather conditions as we have come to know on planet Earth...) I suppose the possibilities are endless!

Thanks laffingrain for your delvings! Smiley
PUL,
Cosmic_Ambitions
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 5th, 2006 at 12:12am by Cosmic_Ambitions »  

Would there be this eternal seeking if the found existed?~Antonio Porchia&&Before enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.  After enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.~Zen Buddhist Proverb&&And remember, no matter where you go, there you are.~Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
PhoenixRa
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #5 - May 5th, 2006 at 12:26am
 
  I've been trying to find out about this Jesus character for awhile, and for awhile when still young thought he was just another God realized fella, and in some respects that is true...

 But there is more to this Jesus fella, he's got quite the history with humanity, heck with the whole shabang.

 Some of you have read Bruce's 4th book?   In the 4th book Bruce communicates with what he calls the Planning Intelligence, and gets an overview of the 'beginning' of creation and all that jazz.

  Consciousness the Creator (from Bruce's viewpoint) apparently was experimenting a bit itself, and some of the original Sparks created just didn't return, there was a lack of love in their base it seems.

  Anyways, one of the Sparks did return, and when Consciousness was looking at it, examining it so to speak, it realized its successful completion was because of the incorperation of Love energy within it--the binding, synthesizing, attracting energy which Bruce likended to water holding together the different parts of the dry cake mix particles.

 The First returned Spark became a creational model, and Edgar Cayce's Sources go a bit farther and say that this Spark became a Co-Creator with Consciousness to create many other Sparks.

   I believe that Jesus's Total Self or Disk is the Planning Intelligence--the Creator God of this Universe, the 8th most expanded Disk of which all our immediate Disks and connecting Disks (the other 7) are a part of.

  There are references throughout various literature from Cayce to ND experiences, to Courtney Brown's Remote Viewing sessions, etc. where Jesus is said to refer to other souls as his children, and if my intuition is right then this is very literally the case.

  Yet, he's just another Soul and helping elder brother, no more and no less than any other.

 But according to Cayce's Source he has had quite the pattern in the Earth, incarnating as many of the Biblical Patriarchs and Retrievers from Adam, Enoch, to Melchizedek, to Joshua (who took over after Moses left the scene), to Jeshua the Scribe who compiled much of the Old testament, Aspha a musician who was with David, the fellow known as Thoth and Hermes respectively by different peoples later on, and a fellow named Zend whose grandson started the first beginnings of Zorastrianism.

  His first manifestation was as Amelius in early Atlantis, and Cayce said that Amelius means "The Light", so this Total Self was literally that Light spoken of in the beginning in the Bible and later confirmed by John, who also said he was the Logos.

  In one interesting psychic reading a man asks if he could reach spiritual perfection in that life, and he is told tersely, why should you think you can accomplish in one life what it took the Master some 30 lifetimes to accomplish?  (not an exact quote, but close).

 His Mother Mary, was said to have been the Twin Soul of the Master from the beginning of their Earth advent, and the Immaculate conception was a result of their Oneness and their respective spiritual development.   Mary was said to have balanced the physical, the mental, and the spiritual to the degree to be able to spark life within her self, through the aid of her companionate Soul--later her son (an intersesting aside, Cayce said she was born under the sign Aquarius).  

  He is the living pattern for all which transcends time and space.

 Cayce's Source called him, the Teacher of Teachers, the Master of Masters.

  Cayce also affirms that Yeshua's Ressurrection was very much a 'physical' event as we understand it too, and hence why he showed up to the Disciples and ate with them after, showing that he still partook of the physical, yet transcending it completely.

 Interestingly in the Bible, when he first shows up to Mary Magdalene (whom Cayce says was actually a courtesan before she met Yeshua, and never his wife, but a co-worker and friend), he told her "Touch me not, for i have not fully risen to my Father"

 A person asked Cayce about this incident and why he said that, and Cayce's Source said that his vibrations/emnations at the time were so powerful that if a person who wasn't fully attuned to that energy touched him then, it would have been like touching a live wire and would have killed the person i.e. Mary.

 So Yeshua...  Its taken me from the age 13 to 26 to get a holistic handle on this guy, and i still don't get it all, but meanwhile i just call him friend and hope to live up to his example, cause that's why he came as an example, as he said we must be like him to know the fully know the Father (Source) again and of repeated message in the E.C. readings too because it is always a like attracts like reality/existence in all dimensions.

  Some channels will tell you not to try to be anything, to be passive and know you are God, while this is all true, Yeshua himself calls us to be active, to be like him, to follow in his example in all ways and to perfectly balance and correlate the physical, mental, and spiritual like he did.

And yes, even the physical has some bearing, Cayce said in Yeshua's younger days traveling through India and other countries he learned Yogic disciplines to strengthen the body and mind, all the while gaining through loving all always (obviously the most important part), and always praying humbly and subserviently "Not my will Father, but yours be done in and through me"  (something Cayce said was extremely important to remember full At-One-Ment like Yeshua).   Cayce said Yeshua eventually lost his will (the selfish self) within the Will of the Father.

 I believe Yeshua is the 1800 some odd year old man that Monroe met in one of his forays (from "Ultimate Journeys")--still very much active in the physical plane as well as in all dimensions.

 I believe that he will eventually make a public appearance again, but Cayce said that this wouldn't happen until the like attracts like conditions were relatively met, but Cayce put it in rather bibical terms, "Not until his enemies are wholly subdued in the Earth"   Not that Yeshua has 'enemies' but that those who set themselves up in opposition to the Christ ways, i.e. those who glorify self, selfishness and materialism and who influence others to that way of being, will meet self in the Changes and either can transmute and grow, or temporarily miss this amazing opportunity within the Earth.

   I believe he will show up after the culmination of the Changes, along with other "Masters" (Light Beings) both of the Earth and of other systems.

 Cayce said he would show up in the same body that he walked in Galilee.  

 Physical description (from the Shroud and Cayce's two descriptions):  5' 11", well proportioned, strong and muscular looking, large very well shaped and roundish head, heavy piercing eyes gray or gray blue, somewhat long hair a mix of golden, reddish, and light brown wavy and curling towards the ends, weight 170*, and lack of typical Aryan profile.

*Interestingly, many years after Cayce gave his weight and description in an unusual reading, there was done forensic research on the man from the Shroud image, and it was ascertained by an extremely well respected scientist in that field that the man would have weighed 170, coincidentally this is the same exact weight that Cayce gave years earlier.  

  So Yeshua from the spiritual, spiritual, and physical viewpoint, a holistic look...

 Oh yeah, he has a great sense of humor and pulled a prank/joke of sorts on me in a dream once.  Cayce said he was even cracking jokes on the way to Calvary, and that this is one of the things that infuriated the higher ups the most.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
LaughingRain
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #6 - May 5th, 2006 at 3:32am
 
Hi Justin ...

nice to see u posting again. was reading today in The Disappearance of the Universe that J was indeed a person with a sense of humor. this jives with me too. I tend to think he never really left so no need for him to return. I really like this book. thanks again Lucy for reccommending it to me if your reading.

hugs, alysia
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
augoeideian
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 958
South Africa
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #7 - May 5th, 2006 at 6:11am
 
Hi Alysia, CA and Justin (nice to hear from you again)  Smiley

Justin, i enjoyed reading your response, and as always Alysia. Also as Beserk as said in the thread nde vs belief; Jesus is A, if not, The Main Part in our world today.

i love Cayce's description of Jesus as well; a big man; blond hair and a great sense of humour.  Also btw wealthy as to be expected from the Spiritual manifested through the physical.

Hey Justin; browsing in a second hand book shop my eyes delighted upon Edgar Cayce's interpretation of 'Revelations' that i am in the midst of now.  This finding was on cue of me finishing a glorious book called the 'Symbols of Revelations' by Fredrick Mouton.  Delightful nourishment  Smiley
Back to top
 

&&
 
IP Logged
 
Touching Souls
Super Member
*****
Offline


LOVE IS ALL, SHINE YOUR
LIGHT THAT OTHERS MAY
SEE

Posts: 1966
Metaline Falls, WA
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #8 - May 5th, 2006 at 2:57pm
 
Justin, good to see you again. Wink

I feel that Yeshua came here to show us exactly what is happening today. We are in the midst of the Ascension. Yeshua ascended just as we will. In other words, he came to show us there is an Afterlife, just as Bruce is doing. We are raising our vibrations for this. As we raise our vibrations, our Love and Light increases. In time, we will all be non-judgmental (those who are working on this). When we get to the point where we can 'actually' Love everyone with Pure Unconditional Love, all else falls into place. We are then Yeshua like or Christ like.

He was teaching all this 2000 years ago. We are all ONE and God's son/daughter just as He is.

Love, Mairlyn Wink
Back to top
 

I AM THAT I AM -- WE ARE ALL ONE -- TOUCHING SOULS
Wink
WWW minniecricket2000  
IP Logged
 
PhoenixRa
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #9 - May 5th, 2006 at 9:13pm
 
  Hi there Alysia,

  Thanks, and btw kool smily face there.  You wrote, Quote:
I tend to think he never really left so no need for him to return.


  Completely agree, but i'm a bit interested in the whole 'public appearance' thang, like he did for awhile 2000 years ago.  I've read a bit of that book you mentioned, liked some parts.

  Peace and hugs too


  Hi Caryn,

  How are you doing?   Am glad you enjoyed it.  Well probably more so red, than blondish, one reading said, "The Master's hair is most red..."    There is a interesting and detailed NDE which matches with this too, and one that a practicing Jewish woman had had-so no reason to lie or to use red anyways--kind of 'random' as my generational culture likes to say.

   Let me know how you like that book, is it by John Van Auken perchance?

  Anyways, take care and peace.


  Hi Mair,

Nice to see you too.   Very much like your reply.  Yep he was teaching this 2000 years ago, and then some as some of the other personalities i mentioned, particularly Enoch and Melchizekek who seemed to have been Light beings in physical as well (in the Bible Enoch didn't 'die', but was translated i.e. "God took him").

  Interesting stuff...

Peace



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jambo
Full Member
***
Offline


1987, a great year for
the human race.

Posts: 182
UK
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #10 - May 5th, 2006 at 10:48pm
 
My personal perspective of Jesus as a human on this earth is that he was a gifted spiritual healer and an extraordinary mystic.

I also believe that he was a super-advanced spirit (if there is such a thing Smiley ) who was sent down from the spirit world to instigate a major change on planet earth.

I don't believe for one minute that he was the messiah, I actually believe he would of resented that claim and would of violently denied this claim
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PhoenixRa
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #11 - May 5th, 2006 at 11:19pm
 
  Hi Jambo,

  What would be your definition of "Messiah" btw?

  Peace

  p.s., i don't think Yeshua could really 'resent' anything at this point, but that's just completely conjecture on my part...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
LaffingRain
Super Member
*****
Offline


Choose this Day

Posts: 5249
Arizona
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #12 - May 5th, 2006 at 11:24pm
 
Jambo I tend to be in agreement except for its really hard for me to see J as violently disagreeing about anything..speaking of getting violent. but yea, he didn't want anyone to worship him or bow down, thats not what he asked for, but that's what he got.
hugs, alysia
Back to top
 

... Who takes away death's sting deprives life of bitterness
WWW http://www.facebook.com/LaughingRain2  
IP Logged
 
Mactek
New Member
*
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 49
Austin
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #13 - May 6th, 2006 at 2:53am
 
Jesus became the realized/actualized Christ of God.  This is a spirtual awareness/knowing of ones own divinity and constant connection to source... oneness with God.  A very deep knowing.

Jesus lived a perfected life and as he grew in stature and understanding he claimed his Christhood completely.  He didn't hide from what he knew to be true, otherwise he could not have embodied the Christ.  In other words, he knew whereof he came even if others did not.

"Messiah" is just a label used to describe the prophecy of one who would come.  The Jews had differing opinions of what this label actually meant.  The meaning attached to it changed over time as well.  Some believe there would be two Messiahs.  A priestly messiah and a kingly messiah.  This could be in reference to John the Baptist and Jesus.

Many thought that the coming of the Messiah meant the end of Roman occupation.  Obviously, if this was the common belief of the people, claiming the label would have hindered Jesus's mission as it had nothing to do with geopolitical conflicts.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jambo
Full Member
***
Offline


1987, a great year for
the human race.

Posts: 182
UK
Gender: male
Re: Jesus
Reply #14 - May 6th, 2006 at 11:12am
 
Quote:
  Hi Jambo,

  What would be your definition of "Messiah" btw?

  Peace

  p.s., i don't think Yeshua could really 'resent' anything at this point, but that's just completely conjecture on my part...


Hey Phoenix  Smiley

My defintion of the messiah is that of which the Jewish religion describes, but you don't have to raise the dead in order to be the messiah, Jesus changed the world forever in his lifetime here on earth.

I made a mistake with my wording on my earlier post, Jesus would of opposed to being labled as the messiah as he was documented to be an extremely modest and humble chap  Smiley  Its also a clear fact that  the word Christ was attached to his name well after his crucifixition, some historians believe that Yeshua was a Pisces Wink  Makes alot of sense Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juditha
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #15 - May 6th, 2006 at 12:28pm
 
Hi I wish i could have been around when Jesus was on the earth ,it was a better place with him being there. I would have loved to sit next to him and i would have asked him so many things. He loved everyone for what they were , and passed around so much love and wisdom while he was there.I envy the people what actually got to meet him face to face ,they were so honoured in my opinion.No wonder the skies went dark and there was thunder in the air when he died ,which was Gods anger at the death of his beloved child, the world was a darker place without him.After all Jesus was the light of the world. God bless juditha
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PhoenixRa
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #16 - May 6th, 2006 at 2:41pm
 
Quote:
Jesus became the realized/actualized Christ of God.  This is a spirtual awareness/knowing of ones own divinity and constant connection to source... oneness with God.  A very deep knowing.

Jesus lived a perfected life and as he grew in stature and understanding he claimed his Christhood completely.  He didn't hide from what he knew to be true, otherwise he could not have embodied the Christ.  In other words, he knew whereof he came even if others did not.

"Messiah" is just a label used to describe the prophecy of one who would come.  The Jews had differing opinions of what this label actually meant.  The meaning attached to it changed over time as well.  Some believe there would be two Messiahs.  A priestly messiah and a kingly messiah.  This could be in reference to John the Baptist and Jesus.

Many thought that the coming of the Messiah meant the end of Roman occupation.  Obviously, if this was the common belief of the people, claiming the label would have hindered Jesus's mission as it had nothing to do with geopolitical conflicts.



 Good points Macteck, and you're right, Messiah then meant different things to different people.   Judas was one of those who thought "Messiah" meant that Yeshua would take up political and Kingly power and vanquish the Romans, and his intent in betraying Yeshua was too force Yeshua to take this role upon himself, all the while not realizing that he didn't come for anything like that.

Like i said earlier, for quite a long time i though he was just another God realized person (true too), but there is more to the whole story than meets the eye.

 I was taking a bath one day when i received a 'rote' of sorts tying all these loose ends, i had never quite fully understood, together into a cohesive whole.  It's more 'multi-layered' than most seem to think.

 And darn if the Bible wasn't actually right on, on that point!   That (that an edited and somewhat political device was literally right, on what i had thought was either symbolic or unecessary idol worship or sorts) really surprised me.  

 I hadn't ever been nor am not now religious or traditionally Christian.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PhoenixRa
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #17 - May 6th, 2006 at 3:23pm
 
Quote:
Hey Phoenix  Smiley

My defintion of the messiah is that of which the Jewish religion describes, but you don't have to raise the dead in order to be the messiah, Jesus changed the world forever in his lifetime here on earth.

I made a mistake with my wording on my earlier post, Jesus would of opposed to being labled as the messiah as he was documented to be an extremely modest and humble chap  Smiley  Its also a clear fact that  the word Christ was attached to his name well after his crucifixition,


 Hi there Jambo,

 If looking at Messiah as one who was promised to come by the various prophets, and one who was a Savior (can substitute "Head Honcho Retriever" if you like), then i believe he was and is the "Messiah".

 He played this role in other lives, as other God Realized Light Beings like Enoch and Melchizedek, but since these had entered in a different manner--he hadn't become a full pattern for humanity.

 It was when he was born of a woman, and then re-accomplished/remembered his God realization then he had become the perfect pattern.

 Christ just means Love (and annointed one), and Yeshua was Love personified to a degree not seen before in the physical Earth--especially considering its density or very slow vibration in that cycle--there were other cycles like Monroe discovered way back when in earlier Lemuria (million or so years ago) where MANY were Christs/God realized BUT it was also the nature of the times--meaning the outer energies then greatly faciliated this, when Yeshua was born and lived, there was no such collective help in the physical Earth, that cycle was very slow vibrating collectively speaking....

 So this gives us an inkling just how amazing this degree of spiritual attunement was--the first to accomplish this in the last great cycle (12 full ages times an Age with an Age being about 2300 years, then 12 times that--lol big number).  

 Btw--when i said earlier that Yeshua's Total Self/Disk was a Creator God, i'm not placing him above us, cause i believe that is our Total Selves destiny as well, or "Is it not written that ye are Gods".    Or as Cayce's Source sometimes quoted him, "Ye are Gods in the making."

Jambo Quote:
...some historians believe that Yeshua was a Pisces Wink  Makes alot of sense Grin


 Lol well could have very well been one, but since there is very little historical info on this to go on, its anybodies guess.

  I've seen many, many, many 'true' charts for him, and many differ.  

 There are many Messianic Jews who believe there is proof that he was born during September, read this: Quote:
What is the significance of Christ's birth in relation to the Feast of Tabernacles? I've heard that the timing of His birth can be calculated by using Zacharias' term of service in the Temple (house of Abia, I Chron. 24), and Elisabeth being in her sixth month of pregnancy at the time Mary was chosen.

If we knew for certain exactly when the course of Abia functioned in the Temple, we could certainly determine very closely the exact time of year that Yeshua was born. Unfortunately, this source of information is in rabbinic writings which are contradictory. Because of the contradictions, we cannot be 100% sure which ones are right, or even if any of those rabbinic traditions are correct. For that reason, scholars who work with the sources must come to the conclusion that the date of the Lord's birth is still indefinite.

Quite a few people in recent times, especially in the messianic movement, but also elsewhere, have desperately been trying to connect the birth of Yeshua with the Feast of Tabernacles and, therefore, will cite one source while ignoring the others, but that is not really fair to the material. I do not think anyone should dogmatize on this issue, because the available sources contradict each other.

I personally have deep doubts that Yeshua was born on the Feast of Tabernacles (or during Passover as some others try to argue) or on any other Jewish holiday. One thing I have noticed in the Gospels is the fact that if Yeshua said or did anything on a specific Jewish Holy Day, the writer always mentions it. It would seem to me that if Yeshua was born on any specific Jewish holiday, Matthew and Luke would have mentioned it, as these are the writers who deal with the birth of the Messiah. This would certainly be true of Matthew, who was writing to a Jewish audience; he would have found this significant enough to mention. But the total silence of both Matthew and Luke in connecting Yeshua's birth with any Jewish Holy Day tells me that Yeshua was born on a normal day, therefore, the Gospel writers do not make mention of the date.


 Since there is no concrete historical data to go on, and it is fairly certain Yeshua wasn't born on actual Christmas day, i turn to psychics who have been tested and holistically verified in diffferent areas.   Namely Cayce since he fulfills this and gave a large amount of info on Yeshua.

  Cayce gave two major dates for his birth, one short and undetailed reading said March 19th 04 (didn't specify B.C. or A.D., but it is obviously B.C.).

 The other date was given in a very detailed reading which noted the weather was cool, noted the various conditions and surroundings of that time, etc. and said he was born on what would NOW be represented by January 6th.  

 In another reading he was asked about the discrepancy and said that these readings had been approached differently and the dates are different according to which times, peoples, etc. they are reckoned from.

  Calendars and dating methods have changed quite a bit, and January wasn't always the "New Year", March actually use to be the New Year.

 But i'm fairly certain that Cayce's Source tried to clarify it by saying for the January date, What would now be represented by.  

 But wait, how and why would Jesus be a Capricorn, and not a Pisces--heck Pisces is the last sign and the culmination...

 Well, if looked at more metaphysically this Jan. 6th date makes a lot of sense, especially considering Cayce's readings on astrology...

 Cayce paid much less attention to signs than do most astrologers, etc.   He said they were personality patterns and the more a Soul evolved and used its spiritual Will, the less they were described by their "Signs"

 Jesus clearly went beyond Sign descriptions...but there was an actual energy that is important to take into account which happens around Jan. 6th.

 Solar Perihelion!  When the Earth is closest to the Sun in its orbit, and speeds up the most.

 The Sun is the physical representation in our Solar System of the Spirit or Father aspect.    The Sun is the fastest vibrating energy in the Earth System and goes beyond even Neptune and Jupiter which is Pisces ruler (similar energy).  

  Symbolically and literally the Solar energy is more powerful within the Earth during Solar Perihelion, and if we can temporarily forget about Signs as in Sun Signs, then this certainly makes sense.

  Also, Yeshua had a stellium of Arcturus, Sirius, and Pluto all Rising in his Chart, planets or stars close to the Rising Sign become extremely powerful indications and tend to dominate the rest of the chart.

 So his strongest influences when born where Sun, Arcturus (like our Sun but even more powerful and faster vibrating), Sirius, and Pluto.

  To say this was a fast vibrating Chart would be a huge understatement.  

 There may have been more signs of his birth, but astrologically i believe these were some of the major ones.  

 Some claim the sign was a Jupiter and Saturn conjunction in Pisces.  But this is not really that unusual or meaningful.  

 Actually i believe 'the sign' was a light show from some very advanced E.T.'s who were also awaiting the birth of Yeshua and making it a more memorable event!  

 Just like with the Fatima incident and the spinning Sun like Disc that was actually photographed.

 Peace


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
LaughingRain
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #18 - May 6th, 2006 at 4:09pm
 
well Justin, whatever planets aided this man/god he certainly rocked the world and didn't stand in one place too long growing moss on his feet..not...I get pictures in my mind of him on the road..maybe getting a lift from a passing camel now and then if he was lucky.
the stars impel but no compel? read this somewhere. and what are planets? heard they were but symbols of cosmic beings. I don't know, my world is all on the inside rather than the skies, but I'd still like to be an astronaut (internally, no spacesuit please)

my best to you, alysia
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Cosmic_Ambitions
Senior Member
****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 402
Re: Jesus
Reply #19 - May 6th, 2006 at 4:21pm
 
Hey LaughingRain laffingrain! Wink

LaughingRain wrote:

"and what are planets? heard they were but symbols of cosmic beings."

I kind of look at it like this:

"The planets, solar systems, galaxies, etc., are all just molecules/atoms within the divines "body"... Just like we have molecules/atoms within our physical body that revolve around nuclei... The Source/Divine has planets (molecules/atoms) revolving around suns (nuclei)... We are all infinitesimal pieces of God's body."

Guess this idea kind of ties into one of the threads that I had previously started... which related finding analogies within the physical world that correlated specifically to functioning systems within the various spiritual realms/inner workings...

PUL,
Cosmic_Ambitions
Back to top
 

Would there be this eternal seeking if the found existed?~Antonio Porchia&&Before enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.  After enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.~Zen Buddhist Proverb&&And remember, no matter where you go, there you are.~Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
LaughingRain
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #20 - May 6th, 2006 at 5:11pm
 
hey Cosmic..u can just call me Chuckles instead of LaughingRain, laffingrain. thats too much typing!

I'm registered twice since our crash, because (u ready 4 this?) my children bought me a new mac. so mac has it's own built in browser Safari. appropriate name for a jungle cruise.  Shocked Safari is more like, lets build this thing and let the people tell us whats wrong with it. ok so daughter loads up Explorer for mac for me, bless her heart. Explorer is cool but is now becoming obsolete; not for you PC users, just for mac users. fine. I now have two browsers, and two caches that get messed up whenever this place crashes. since I was locked out of here and couldn't get a password sent to me for a WHOLE DAY!  I panicked and I'm not touching either one of my registrations the rest of my life. (unless we crash again) so just call me Chuckles.

hugs, I know I'm off topic again. alysia Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
spooky2
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2368
Re: Jesus
Reply #21 - May 6th, 2006 at 6:06pm
 
I'm not an expert, but isn't it just a cookie problem? I mean to transfer the old cookies into the other computer wouldn't it give you access with your old profile? Hmm. Ok if I tell waste here, just get a brownie and forget it.
Spooky
Back to top
 

"I'm going where the pavement turns to sand"&&Neil Young, "Thrasher"
 
IP Logged
 
spooky2
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2368
Re: Jesus
Reply #22 - May 6th, 2006 at 6:14pm
 
Well ok one word about Jesus. I'm not a Christian, means I don't resonate with any churches, but grew up in a surrounding of liberal Christians.
So once, surprisingly to me, I had an encounter with what I identified as Jesus (well you know on a mind journey). To me it was an "uplifter", a very kind person/entity who, if you are in a certain area and want higher, "he" can lift you up.
In a dream when I was a child I had this sense of a such long time distance on earth, and I was there, and at a point of this time distance there was Jesus; briefly, but clear, VERY clear (see my old "The Signal" thread for what this dream means to me).

Spooky
Back to top
 

"I'm going where the pavement turns to sand"&&Neil Young, "Thrasher"
 
IP Logged
 
Cosmic_Ambitions
Senior Member
****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 402
Re: Jesus
Reply #23 - May 6th, 2006 at 11:26pm
 
I can work with Chuckles! LOL! Wink

I kinda liked LaughingRain laffingrain... but, you're right, it is a lot of typing. LOL!

"'Till next time... Chuckles!"

PUL,
Cosmic_Ambitions Smiley



Back to top
 

Would there be this eternal seeking if the found existed?~Antonio Porchia&&Before enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.  After enlightenment-chop wood, carry water.~Zen Buddhist Proverb&&And remember, no matter where you go, there you are.~Confucius
 
IP Logged
 
augoeideian
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 958
South Africa
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #24 - May 7th, 2006 at 8:04am
 
Hi  

um, Justin the Edgar Cayce 'Revelations' is published by the A.R.E. and dictated to his (normal) group of people the Glad Helpers with his wife; Mrs C asking him the questions.

In the book Cayce discusses our glandular system in our body... very interesting. I'll let you know further when i have finished.

Jesus left His Blood here in the Earth.  The atoms in Jesus's blood resonant at a high vibration in the Earth.  The closer Jesus's Spirit comes to Earth the higher the vibration of His Blood in the Earth.

I say Jesus must have been born with the Cross in His birthchart.  The Fixed Signs making the cross; at the Midheaven, the Eagle (Scorpio) the Nadir, the Bull (Taurus) the Ascendant, the Man (Aquarius)and Descendant, the Lion (Leo)  Wink


Back to top
 

&&
 
IP Logged
 
PhoenixRa
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #25 - May 7th, 2006 at 11:13am
 
Quote:
well Justin, whatever planets aided this man/god he certainly rocked the world and didn't stand in one place too long growing moss on his feet..not...I get pictures in my mind of him on the road..maybe getting a lift from a passing camel now and then if he was lucky.
the stars impel but no compel? read this somewhere. and what are planets? heard they were but symbols of cosmic beings. I don't know, my world is all on the inside rather than the skies, but I'd still like to be an astronaut (internally, no spacesuit please)

my best to you, alysia


  Yup, the stars impel but do not compel.  But it seems like a lot of people stay more or less bond-servants of their stars (chart)..

  Or to put it another way, in Cayce's day, he gave a reading which said that on average about 20 percent of people would not be very well described by their astrological influences due to the exercise of Freewill and degree of spiritual attunement.

  That leaves about 80% on the other side of it.

  But i do believe that there is an ever growing number/percentage of people who are like that 20 percent above.  In my studies, and doing charts i would hazard to say that percentage has probably gone up about another 10 percent or so.

  I really like what CosmicAmbitions had to say in the below:

Quote:
"The planets, solar systems, galaxies, etc., are all just molecules/atoms within the divines "body"... Just like we have molecules/atoms within our physical body that revolve around nuclei... The Source/Divine has planets (molecules/atoms) revolving around suns (nuclei)... We are all infinitesimal pieces of God's body."

Guess this idea kind of ties into one of the threads that I had previously started... which related finding analogies within the physical world that correlated specifically to functioning systems within the various spiritual realms/inner workings...


  I would also add that the stars (the outer) have a relative relationship to the growth/developement of our Souls...    There is a Co-Resonation which goes on, and Souls also literally experience the non-physical dimensions of other planets and Stars.

  The 'inner' and 'outer' are connected.

  Peace


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PhoenixRa
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #26 - May 7th, 2006 at 12:12pm
 
Quote:
Hi  

um, Justin the Edgar Cayce 'Revelations' is published by the A.R.E. and dictated to his (normal) group of people the Glad Helpers with his wife; Mrs C asking him the questions.

In the book Cayce discusses our glandular system in our body... very interesting. I'll let you know further when i have finished.



 Thanks for the heads up on the Revelations info.

You wrote, Quote:
I say Jesus must have been born with the Cross in His birthchart.  The Fixed Signs making the cross; at the Midheaven, the Eagle (Scorpio) the Nadir, the Bull (Taurus) the Ascendant, the Man (Aquarius)and Descendant, the Lion (Leo)  Wink


 Are there any particular reasons why you believe this?

 Anyways, i agree that he did have fixed Signs on the Ascendant/Descendant axis, but i believe its the other way around, that he has Leo Rising.

The reasoning behind this?   I've done a bit of research into correlating physical looks with the astrological indications.  

 I've come up with a pretty good system relating these seemingly unrelated attributes.

 From the Shroud indications and from Cayce's descriptions (if these are both true), then it would strongly suggest that Yeshua was born with Leo Rising.

  He couldn't look anymore Archetypally Leo Ascendant from these descriptions, from the reddish golden hair, to the large shoulders, proportional muscular build, large blue gray eyes, somewhat squarish face with a high noble forehead, large well shaped head.

 There are only 2 Ascendant signs which strongly tend to reddish hair--Aries and Leo, and 1 sign which sometimes indicates reddish hues but usually more chestnut or auburn--Sagittarius.

 There are two Planets which on average indicate strong reddish hair color when Rising and incidentally they are the 'rulers' of the first 2 mentioned signs above--Mars and the Sun.  

 There can be reddish highlights from other considerations..  For example, say you have Aquarius Rising, but Sun in Leo on the Descendant is closely opposing your Ascendant degree--this could definitely indicate some reddish--reddish blond coloring, differing from the average Aquarian Rising but even in that case it most often would be more as 'highlights' and not so much full blown reddish-golden hair.


 Another reason which when correlated with the above makes me strongly believe his Rising was Leo.  

  Cayce gave a nice little hint when he said that his Mother who was also his Twin Soul, was an Aquarian Sun.

  In my synastric (the study of chart comparisons) studies and research, i've found that the singe strongest comparison aspect one can have with another is a person's Sun being opposite the others Rising sign.  

  I see this often in particularly close and spiritual relationships.   Oppositions mean "relationship" and the Sun and Rising the the most important and strongest factors in a person's chart.

  My own Twin Soul and i share this comparison aspect, she a Aquarius Sun and me Leo Rising--and as you can see from my avatar pic, my own chart testifies to the reddish golden coloring (quite large head) and light gray blue eyes (the dimensions/proportions in that pic are somewhat distorted though and my face a bit longer and skinnier).

  Another reason why this chart fits:

 For awhile, around the time Yeshua was born, there was a stellium of powerful Stars/Planets in early Virgo, Arcturus, Sirius, and Pluto.

 As many know, Virgo is the next sign after Leo.  In my astro. research and studies, i've found that the strongest factors/indications in the birth chart are the Sun Sign, a Planet within 12 degrees of the Ascendant on either side (or generally Rising), a Planet near the Mid-heaven (especially when making a close aspect to the Ascend.), and a Planet in the 5th (especially when making a close aspect to the Ascend. degree).

 And the second factor i mentioned, a Planet Rising--especially closely conjuncting the Ascend. degree can very much over-shadow the rest of the chart including even the Sun Sign tendencies/indications.  

 For example, say you born under the rash, outgoing, headstrong, impulsive, full of energy and initiative, somewhat insensitive and fiery Aries Sun sign, and even had outgoing and social Libra on the Ascendant...but you also had Saturn Rising..

 The person would feel, act, and seem more like a cautious Capricorn type and would tend to these traits more so than to even the Aries--Libra axis.   To be sure, the Aries--Libra would still be there, but in more subtle ways.    Relationships and self vs. others would certainly be highlighted in the life, etc.

 Cayce once called Arcturus "his Star", so it seems to make a lot of sense that this super fast vibrating and expansive energy (Arcturus) was the closest influence to Yeshua's late Leo Ascendant degree.  

 Because of Cayce's description of Yeshua's hair tending towards curls at the end, and reinforcing the coloring descriptions and the slightly longer face (than a pure Leo Rising--which rarely happens anyways), it also makes sense that there is a slight Aries energy on his Rising and indeed if Yeshua was born with a very late Leo Rising it would be in the Aries decant and so would have a definite but subtle Aries flavor to the looks--thus more curling and more reddish hair, and longer somewhat narrower face.

 But i'm not a 100 percent on all this because this circumstantial 'evidence' of sorts is based on some assumptions which aren't necessarily true (though i very much trust Cayce's info from personal experience with health problems and other issues and i'm fairly convinced the Shroud image is from the Ressurrection process).

 Besides, none of this really matters--its clear that though Yeshua when born was subject to natural Law (of which astrology is an important part), when he overcame and purified self, he transcended natural Law and so completely transcended astrological influences and indications.

 I just find this stuff interesting, cause i've always had a very deep and intense desire to know the why's and wherefores behind things, to know the causes behind effects, and to synthesize.

 Peace

 




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
augoeideian
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 958
South Africa
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #27 - May 8th, 2006 at 5:25am
 
Hi Justin
My suggestion of Jesus’ birthchart placing is hypothetical; based on the following:

Caryn’s hypothetical birthchart of Jesus

The Great Cross formation
Scorpio (Midheaven)
The Eagle soaring over mountain tops transformed from the scorpion on the ground.
Taurus (Nadir)
The Bull of Earth at his feet detached from earthly ways.
Aquarius (Ascendant)
The Man Rising pouring Spiritual Water into the dry earth.
Leo (Descendant)
The Lion has been conquered; man has overcome the beast within.

To place the planet’s in the above formation:

I would agree with Edgar Cayce that the birthday of Jesus is January 6th (year?)
This makes Jesus’ sun sign Capricorn which I would agree with; Capricorn being the sign of initiation.

So therefore:
Sun in Capricorn 11th  
Moon in Taurus   4th    
Venus in Pisces  1st    
Mercury in Pisces1st    
Mars in Pisces 1st    
Jupiter in Scorpio 9th    
Saturn in Sagittarius 10th
Neptune in Sagittarius 9th  
Uranus in Capricorn 11th  
Pluto in Libra 8th  
Gemini 4th/ 5th    
Cancer 5th/6th
Aries 3rd  
Virgo 7th
Descendant Leo 6th
Ascendant Aquarius 12th/1st


Further mediation

Capricorn The Light of Initiation
Taurus The Penetrating Light of the Path
Pisces The Light of the World
Scorpio The Light of Day
Sagittarius A beam of directed focused Light
Libra The Light that moves to Rest
Gemini The Light of Interplay
Cancer The Light within the Form
Aries The Light of Life Itself
Virgo The blended Dual Light
Leo The Light of the Soul
Aquarius The Light that shines on Earth across the Sea

Justin; this is what i would like to put forward as a possible birthchart for Jesus.
I hear what you say about Leo possibly being the Ascendant but i would say Leo is balancing Aquarius as a duality. Further Leo would be on the Descendant because man has overcome the beast within (from the days of Eranus trying to speed up evolution) as symbolised by the Sphinx.

My house division (Koch) is not direct on the axis's
hence the split of signs but this is normal for blending of the signs behind and forward.

I have reflected this birthchart on esoteric symbolism.  I look forward to your comments.

Lastly i apologies for the layout and ideally would have liked to have inserted the Wheel.  Also this page does not like tabs!

Fond regards.


Back to top
 

&&
 
IP Logged
 
PhoenixRa
Ex Member


Re: Jesus
Reply #28 - May 8th, 2006 at 4:40pm
 
Quote:
Hi Justin
My suggestion of Jesus’ birthchart placing is hypothetical; based on the following:

Caryn’s hypothetical birthchart of Jesus

The Great Cross formation
Scorpio (Midheaven)
The Eagle soaring over mountain tops transformed from the scorpion on the ground.
Taurus (Nadir)
The Bull of Earth at his feet detached from earthly ways.
Aquarius (Ascendant)
The Man Rising pouring Spiritual Water into the dry earth.
Leo (Descendant)
The Lion has been conquered; man has overcome the beast within.

To place the planet’s in the above formation:

I would agree with Edgar Cayce that the birthday of Jesus is January 6th (year?)
This makes Jesus’ sun sign Capricorn which I would agree with; Capricorn being the sign of initiation.

So therefore:
Sun in Capricorn 11th  
Moon in Taurus   4th    
Venus in Pisces  1st    
Mercury in Pisces1st    
Mars in Pisces 1st    
Jupiter in Scorpio 9th    
Saturn in Sagittarius 10th
Neptune in Sagittarius 9th  
Uranus in Capricorn 11th  
Pluto in Libra 8th  
Gemini 4th/ 5th    
Cancer 5th/6th
Aries 3rd  
Virgo 7th
Descendant Leo 6th
Ascendant Aquarius 12th/1st


Further mediation

Capricorn The Light of Initiation
Taurus The Penetrating Light of the Path
Pisces The Light of the World
Scorpio The Light of Day
Sagittarius A beam of directed focused Light
Libra The Light that moves to Rest
Gemini The Light of Interplay
Cancer The Light within the Form
Aries The Light of Life Itself
Virgo The blended Dual Light
Leo The Light of the Soul
Aquarius The Light that shines on Earth across the Sea

Justin; this is what i would like to put forward as a possible birthchart for Jesus.
I hear what you say about Leo possibly being the Ascendant but i would say Leo is balancing Aquarius as a duality. Further Leo would be on the Descendant because man has overcome the beast within (from the days of Eranus trying to speed up evolution) as symbolised by the Sphinx.

My house division (Koch) is not direct on the axis's
hence the split of signs but this is normal for blending of the signs behind and forward.

I have reflected this birthchart on esoteric symbolism.  I look forward to your comments.

Lastly i apologies for the layout and ideally would have liked to have inserted the Wheel.  Also this page does not like tabs!

Fond regards.




  Hi there Caryn, thanks for the reply.   Well i think you know what i think already lol, it's another case where we have differing beliefs.   If it works for you, that's great and all that matters.   And the above is certainly possible since we don't have much to go on eh.


   But i think i will stick with my intuitions for now.  I'm not much of a fan of 'esoteric' astrology, though i am formulating and studying a deeper metaphysical astrology.   And as you know, i pay much less attention to signs than do both traditional and esoteric astrologers--so i can't really comment on your chart above.   I do appreciate you sharing it with me though.

Quote:
I would agree with Edgar Cayce that the birthday of Jesus is January 6th (year?)


  Well i'm still researching this aspect--possibly Don could help out in this area since he seems very knowledgable concerning Biblical history.

   I don't know how true it is, but i've read that the Herod who was responsible for the massacre of the innocents, was known to have died in or around the year 04 B.C.(?) 

   Though there are errors in (which Cayce seems to have suggested) the supposedly Akashically transcribed Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ by Levi, it seems like it may be correct in general.   

  In this book, Levi makes it seem like Herod didn't die too long after he gave the orders for the slaughter of all male children under ages 2 (?). 

  But then again, i don't know how old Yeshua would have been during this (Cayce said that Herod ordered that infants from 6 months to 2 years to be killed).   I don't think he could have been too old--probably from a half a year to one year.

  Astrologically in my research it seems so far that Jan. 6th 05 B.C.E. seems to fit the most both natally and when looking at progressions (for example, his progressed Sun in Aquarius would be exactly on his natal Aquarian Venus [ruler of the 10th] when he was 33 around the age he died, plus some interesting 8th house stuff going on in the natal--like Saturn being right on the cusp from Pisces to Aries in the 8th conjunct the North node in Aries in 8th).   

  In the Swiss Ephemphris, it is listed under the Julian Calendar, and to put it into our Gregorian calendar you have to look 2 days ahead, so looking at this ephemphris you would look at the Jan. 8th date.

  But to make matters a bit more difficult, Cayce and the Aquarian Gospel says that Yeshua was physically born just after Mid-night.   

  So, looking at it from our time frame, it may be that he was born end of Jan. 5th, and beginning of Jan. 6th. 

  I believe that Yeshua completed his personality a few hours before his actual physical birth.   This is a somewhat common thing found in the Cayce readings, Souls completing their personalities a few hours before or after their physical birth (this is when the chart would be most accurate). 

  So, in looking at this Swiss Ephem.  you would actually look at positions from Jan. 7th, a few hours before Jan. 8th, i believe.

  But i'm still studying the years 4 B.C.E and 6 B.C.E, and will look at transits and progressions for around his death for these charts too.

  Hopefully Don will respond and help out a bit?

  Take care Caryn, Shalom.

   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
augoeideian
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 958
South Africa
Gender: female
Re: Jesus
Reply #29 - May 9th, 2006 at 10:09am
 
Hi Justin

Thanks for your reply. Interesting research and the year @5 BC for the birth of Jesus does seem to be the one in common with most studies.

I was thinking though; imagine if Jesus was born much earlier in @100 BC (historical dates that we have do tend to be a bit mixed up) that would mean we would be close to an end and a beginning of a Procession of the Equinox cycle  - with a mere 19 years to go.  Or if we look at the Maya calendar stating an 'event' will happen in the year 2012 we might adjust the birth of Jesus to the year 113 BC.

Of course this is, again, hypothetical and assuming (which i think it did) the birth of Jesus heralded in a new cycle of the equinox; The Age of Pisces.

So, hypothetically, the Age of Aquarius might start in 2012 ...

Though, some state that the Age of Aquarius started with the French Revolution in the 1700's or some say even earlier with the Renaissance in the 14th century ...

Wouldn't it be great to have a fixed point from when to calculate the Procession upon and what sign would the Great Procession Return (25,500 yrs) be in ... Capricorn?

Or maybe Jesus was heralding in the Age of Aquarius and this is the last sign .. then Mayan year of 2012 would be a fitting year .. with the 12 in it.

Well im going in circles here literally - excuse the pun! (and ramblings)

Starting with the birth year of Jesus would be nice; Don?!  Smiley
Back to top
 

&&
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.