spooky2
|
Hi mattb1000, yes, haha, didn't notice the second meaning! My turn on this is: We cannot be shure if what we perceive is the truth or reality or if there are those ones at all BUT we do now for sure that there is at least something, so to say, there is existence, so the nothing/oblivion cannot last forever. It's an old question whether there is a beginning (then something jumps into existence out of nothing) or if there is no beginning (then something is there which never had begun to exist, eternity), Aristotle reported this problem and pondered whether this or that. Of course, there will be no answer to it that would be convincing for everybody, because we touch time, space, eternity and those things we can't figure out with our limited view. Regarding your mathematical approach/question I say "no". We just don't have a function (unless one creates one, mathematicans can do everything, but don't ask how it correlates with physics) coming from observation/physics which says that if there is an existence for a period of time then there must be another one when time progresses infinitely. This rule must come from a source outside pure mathematics to have any meaning (not only playing with mathematical concepts). Another thing is, the y-axis, is it a continuum or digital? If continouus, there were degrees of existence, such as "little existing", "very much existing"; sounds strange! Or digital, then there is just existance or non existance; sounds more reasonable, if the term "existence" includes all the different kinds we are aware of (like existence as a baby, as a boy, as a man etc.).
Happy thinking, Spooky
|