Quote:I think the important thing, Bud, is that the issue is violence in any form, not who the perpetrator is, as Mairlyn has stated.
We can all get sidetracked by nuances of meaning but it is obvious that you and everyone else knows what has been observed here. I would not change my original statement. If it was a child being punched I would say "child" and if it was a man being punched I would say "man" because, after all, we are all human beings.
Why is it important to know who the villain is when violence appears in our world? There is no villain...there is only the bad dream from which we as a species need to AWAKEN.
love, blink
nonetheless, I laugh every time I see that clip. Of course, I enjoy slapstick, and that's basically what this is. I suppose cartoons and the three stooges are violent too, but I really enjoy that sort of thing. Anybody see the movie "Dodgeball?" I never imagined seeing a guy get hit with a wrench could be so amusing. The outakes on that movie are hilarious. How about that Tom Hanks movie "Ladykillers?" Something about a large black woman slapping the crap out of a young guy whilst scolding him is just inherently funny to me. Again, the outtakes on that scene were too much.
As for real violence, the notion that growing consciousness takes us away from our natural tendency toward violence is a given. That's why we have so many weak victims able to raise more weak children all the while building morals that protect them. Overall it's progress, but along the way greater consciousness in a weak, inherently violent species leaves it vulnerable to more effect from less potent physical threats. Where is this going? The same way all other complex, large brained species went... the way of the dino. (imho) But that's not all bad either, because we can certainly inhabit another species as we inhabit this one. Maybe slapstick won't be funny to our next set of shells? hmmmm, hard to imagine.