Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Send Topic Print
Incarnation (Read 37716 times)
Lights of Love
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 881
Re: Incarnation
Reply #60 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 12:09pm
 
Quote:
In the picture Kathy describes, the higher disc can send out probe after probe (incarnations), each with their own consciousness.  I believe this is Bruce's model too.  One does wonder why a higher self would be sending people down to earth who do harm and don't learn their lessons.


Hi Matthew,

I'm going to start a new thread that might address this issue to a certain extent.

Quote:
I myself am not sure about the higher self disc concept, as I feel we are all one, and part of one God.  Having a higher self composed of many points of consciousness is like a mini model for what I believe all of reality is.  Therefore, the higher self/disc is an artificial construct, no more real than our individual selves.


This is my thought, too.

Pertaining to one of your other posts that I read somewhere, I think that once we are able to see that there is beauty within every imperfection, then we are able to experience the human perspective of the fullness of the oneness that each of us is within the whole of creation. 

That your karma is my karma and vice versa might be an example of this understanding.

Love, Kathy Smiley
Back to top
 

Tread softly through life with a tender heart and a gentle, understanding spirit.
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Incarnation
Reply #61 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 12:43pm
 
I can't understand how existence is possible. Logically it makes sense that nothing exists at all. Should I stop believing that I exist, simply because my intellect can't figure it out?

And it doesn't matter what well meaning sources have to say about the fact of existence. If I can't figure it out intellectually, then I probably don't exist.  Not in anyway what so ever.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Incarnation
Reply #62 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 1:23pm
 
I am sorry if my thread/inquiry has created more questions than answers.  It may be that given the limits of what we know, and of logic, that the questions on incarnation can not be answered.

As for nothing existing:  I think therefore I am. You, recoverer, perceive, you think, you know.  Why?  It just is.  The basic existence of all the universe starts with that statement.

M
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rondele
Ex Member


Re: Incarnation
Reply #63 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 1:59pm
 
It's revealing that a book that so many people believe to be the words of Jesus, "A Course in Miracles", punts when it comes to the issue of reincarnation.

"Jesus" tells us that it really doesn't matter whether reincarnation is true or not.  If such a belief contributes to the student's overall learning of the Course, then it's ok.  But if the student does not believe in it, then that's ok too.  In other words, having the belief or not having it is irrelevant when it comes to learning ACIM.

Gee that's slick.  There are a lot of serious flaws in ACIM that any astute reader will easily spot.  To me, ducking the question of reincarnation in this way artfully avoids taking a stand on the issue. 

On the other hand, a more charitable view would point out that reincarnation is understood in so many different ways that maybe one pat answer would not suffice.  Do we reincarnate in a sequential way or do we have multiple incarnations all at the same time? 

Or do we just live once as the person we are, but spin off other aspects of ourselves each time we are faced with a major decision in our lives, as Seth says?

Truth is, of course, that none of us know.  My personal view is that it's not something we can know and therefore why bother with it.  We need to focus on the life we have right now, and not get sidetracked by things that simply cannot be known on way or the other. 

Or another way of putting it is, suppose we could know conclusively that reincarnation is true.  How would that knowledge change the way we live our day to day life?  Probably very little.

Roger
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
recoverer
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 5027
Gender: male
Re: Incarnation
Reply #64 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 3:37pm
 
Rondelle:

I started reading ACIM recently, and I must state that I disagree with you.

One of the course's main premises is that time is unreal, therefore, everything that happens within time is also unreal. It also understands that some people will make a big issue of reincarnation, and try to determine whether or not the course is legitimate according to their preconceived idea as to whether or not reincarnation is real.  Considering how intelligent people can be so diametrically opposed on this issue, it is best that an issue that really isn't all that important when it comes to a person's spiritual growth, doesn't become the basis for dismissing the course.

It isn't Jesus' fault that people in the physical make such an issue of the subject of reincarnation. If he spoke either way, a lot of people would unfortunately be deterred  from reading the course.

If a person reads the course with the mindset, either conscious or hidden, of being opposed to it, then he'll  (or she'll) find reasons to dismiss it.

On the other hand, if he forgets about his preconceived ideas, and sees if what the course states makes sense, chances are he'll see differently.

If a person believes that God, despite his infinite love and wisdom, has set things up so that many souls get sentenced to hell for all of eternity, they might have a hard time accepting the course.



Quote:
It's revealing that a book that so many people believe to be the words of Jesus, "A Course in Miracles", punts when it comes to the issue of reincarnation.

"Jesus" tells us that it really doesn't matter whether reincarnation is true or not.  If such a belief contributes to the student's overall learning of the Course, then it's ok.  But if the student does not believe in it, then that's ok too.  In other words, having the belief or not having it is irrelevant when it comes to learning ACIM.

Gee that's slick.  There are a lot of serious flaws in ACIM that any astute reader will easily spot.  To me, ducking the question of reincarnation in this way artfully avoids taking a stand on the issue.  

On the other hand, a more charitable view would point out that reincarnation is understood in so many different ways that maybe one pat answer would not suffice.  Do we reincarnate in a sequential way or do we have multiple incarnations all at the same time?  

Or do we just live once as the person we are, but spin off other aspects of ourselves each time we are faced with a major decision in our lives, as Seth says?

Truth is, of course, that none of us know.  My personal view is that it's not something we can know and therefore why bother with it.  We need to focus on the life we have right now, and not get sidetracked by things that simply cannot be known on way or the other.  

Or another way of putting it is, suppose we could know conclusively that reincarnation is true.  How would that knowledge change the way we live our day to day life?  Probably very little.

Roger

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BRAVI
New Member
*
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 26
TX
Gender: female
Re: Incarnation
Reply #65 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 4:08pm
 
Hi DocM  Thanks for the reply on focus 27. I went on to the afterlife and ive got a lot of informatoin from it . Ive found out a lot of things about the afterlife i did not know before . God bless juditha


How did you travel to the afterlife? and what information did you yet from there?....what really did you see?...how is the spirit world look alike?

Please reply.
Thanks
Bravi
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 979
Gender: male
Re: Incarnation
Reply #66 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 4:58pm
 
Matthew,

You may be generating more questions than answers, but your posts here are productive because you generally engage these questions with sound logic.   I'd be interested in how you'd respond to two challenges: (1) the notion that your monistic view of reality is neither true nor false, but meaningless; (2) the case against the New Age connection between the alleged timelessness of astral realms and the possibility of parallel incarnations.  In this post, I will limit myself to (2).

The notion of multiple parallel incarnations depends on the logically incoherent doctrine of timeless astral realms.   This doctrine excludes sequential events that would be essential to postmortem evolutionarly progress.  Once experience becomes sequential, it becomes subject to time.   This does not mean that the exoerience of time remains identical to our earthly temporal experience.   Thus, many years of astral projection teach Swedenborg:

“Even though things keep happening in sequence and progressing in heaven the way they do in the world, still angels [= discarnate humans] have no notion of the concepts of time and space... The reason angels do not know what time is (even though everything for them moves along in sequence just the way it does in our world...) is that in heaven there are no years or days, but only changes changes of state (HH 162-163).”.  

Astral adept Robert Bruce concurs but speaks in terms of occasionally compressed time in the astral planes.  How can you disregard this independent confirmation from the direct experience of astral adepts with very different metaphysical outlooks?

The logical incoherence of the doctrine of timeless astral realms is illustrated by the Seth entity’s self-contradictory reasoning in "Eternal Validity of the Soul" (151-152), Seth says, "There is no time schedule, and yet it is very unusual for an individual to wait for anything over three centuries between lives, for this makes the orientation very difficult, and the emotional ties with the earth have become weak."  But Seth also assumes that time is irrelevant for entities between lives.  And the earth
ties can only become gradually weakened if there is in fact a passage of time!

There is a significant contradiction between Bruce Moen and Robert Monroe in their treatment of parallel incarnations.  Bruce claims to be a parallel incarnation frm the same Disk Self as Robert. But Robert is astrally informed that he has only one parallel incarnation--a female one.  He is also told that "she would seem like a long-lost sister (UJ 174)."  Bruce reports no such sense of intimacy in his earthly meeting with Robert.  Robert's daughter, Laurie, is the President of the Monroe Institute.  She told Roger that her father was in fact no longer making appearances to astral travelers.  She directed this comment to claims of ongoing astral contacts with her father.  She and her TMI colleagues are the most likely to know the truth in this regard but as Roger has said, it would be great to get her to clarify her assertion.

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Incarnation
Reply #67 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 5:44pm
 
Don,

I hate the notion that there is nothing true or false, good or evil, right or wrong, but some of the logic and experience shows me that in the greatest sense of the spiritual world, if we are one with God, that we may realize that our notions of separateness, and in many instances right and wrong, melt away (if we are not separate, we should do good to each other, for he is I, etc. but the cosmic play is not real on earth).

If I could know God, see the heavens as I have read in two of Swedenborg's books or speak with spirits, I wouldn't feel as confused as I do.   If I had a personal relationship with God or Jesus, and felt it to my core, I wouldn't be trying to figure things out as much (I don't think so at least).  Alas, as most here I am still searching for answers.

I agree that without time in heaven, there is a change of one state to another or a sequence.  That is why I began this thread.  The notion of multiple simultaneous incarnations is tough to swallow. 

I can't get past the life is meaningless if we are all one bit too easily, and I have felt somewhat depressed by that today.  I find meaning in the love of my son and family, my work, my interactions with others.  If most of that is illusory, if merging with God into pure perception is the eventual goal, than my actions are not so much meaningful as they are necessary.  To try to act rightly, as mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita, is based on right thought.  So I should love my neighbor, act that way, and be part of society because I am a human being.  I would like to find more meaning.  Initially this came to me by small experiments that showed me that my thoughts could affect reality.  This was fun initially, but carried no moral uplifting feeling or love with it.

Now, I am trying to heal and actually think lovingly of others, including those on this and other boards with problems. 

But if our individuality and separateness from the divine is an illusion, then at some point we sit back with our mouth open, a glazed look in our eyes and say "why should I play this game any more."

We hear and know that the goal is to express and understand love. 

I have been hoping to hear more from you, Don on these points, and was really hoping that Bruce, Kyo, and others with mystical experience would also weigh in.  I think there are no answers that are absolute and some of it depresses me.

As I type this though, I have the feeling of "the observer"  Aware of my hands typing and my consciousness, but my physical nature seems part of the outside.  Yet, with all these metaphysical disappointments, I'm a bit down about it all.

I think I "get it," for what most are saying about the nature of things.  I'd like to feel better about it all.

M
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Incarnation
Reply #68 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 5:57pm
 
By the way, Don

You actually do have an open minded view of christianity, and as such, it must be horrible to read so much concurrence on the monistic view as you called it, which makes life overall seem meaningless.  As such, your input is always appreciated, because many want to know that side of the coin.   I think many "new agers" would say that what you see as meaningless has a meaning ultimately of PUL.  That love is what we are all meant to see, and truly express. 

I haven't had enough mystical experience to say, but I'm moving the PUL way myself until I get more data.  You even quoted from Paul I believe who talked about elevating one's thoughts, aspirations, etc.  In some ways, if you can't attain instant karma or PUL, then trying to is the best you can do.


M
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lights of Love
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 881
Re: Incarnation
Reply #69 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 7:20pm
 
Just thinking about your post where you say you're feeling depressed about these things.  I suppose if we were to consider ourselves merely a probe then that would be depressing.  Sort of looking at the glass half empty, rather than half full.

I think we need to remember that we are not only a piece of the whole, we are the whole!

Love, Kathy Smiley
Back to top
 

Tread softly through life with a tender heart and a gentle, understanding spirit.
 
IP Logged
 
Kyo_Kusanagi
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 317
Re: Incarnation
Reply #70 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 8:59pm
 
Matthew wrote,

Quote:
I can't get past the life is meaningless if we are all one bit too easily, and I have felt somewhat depressed by that today.  I find meaning in the love of my son and family, my work, my interactions with others.  If most of that is illusory, if merging with God into pure perception is the eventual goal, than my actions are not so much meaningful as they are necessary.  To try to act rightly, as mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita, is based on right thought.  So I should love my neighbor, act that way, and be part of society because I am a human being.  I would like to find more meaning.  Initially this came to me by small experiments that showed me that my thoughts could affect reality.  This was fun initially, but carried no moral uplifting feeling or love with it.

Now, I am trying to heal and actually think lovingly of others, including those on this and other boards with problems.  

But if our individuality and separateness from the divine is an illusion, then at some point we sit back with our mouth open, a glazed look in our eyes and say "why should I play this game any more."

We hear and know that the goal is to express and understand love.  

I have been hoping to hear more from you, Don on these points, and was really hoping that Bruce, Kyo, and others with mystical experience would also weigh in.  I think there are no answers that are absolute and some of it depresses me.


Dear Matthew,

Quite the contrary, life is realized to be infinitely meaningful and joyful, precisely because All the Cosmos is One, and precisely because the relative 'subjectiveness' of reality allows for the freedom of the spirit (ie. of each & all souls) to explore and experience reality with a unique perspective.

This is exactly as God (the Oneness) intended, for it is the basis of the purpose of Creation. A joyful, loving exploration of existence, and of the infinite possibilities, worlds, perspectives for this.

Matthew, it is very interesting what you're currently experiencing. Because when seen from a higher perspective, the Oneness of it all gives infinitely (quite literally) more joy, as does the freedom of individual creativity and expression, gives infinitely (again quite literally) greater purpose and meaning to it all.

And yet, you appear to struggle with depression when the cause is for Joy, and meaninglessness when the cause is for Purpose. I say this is particularly interesting, because from my observation and experience, what you are experiencing, is the deliberate swing of the pendulum from one end to the other - to gain keenest insights, understanding and mastery into various issues, as part of the learning process the individual often chooses to apparently begin with the opposite viewpoint, observes a internal dissatisfaction (or 'depression' or 'meaninglessness') that is indicative of a counter-truth with regards to his own nature, soul and truth.

Similarly, certain individuals choose to create negative karma, and in the balancing of that negative karma (the pendulum swings to the other end), and they experience a powerful learning and evolution in that area. For instance, the reformed criminal is particularly or especially understanding and compassionate, for both the perpetrator and victim, and has the strongest motivation to assist them.

In the Clarification work of Byron Katie, correctly applying the TurnAround always results in a joy that is directly equivalent of the earlier depression that was indicative of the false idea or false viewpoint (ie. false to, or against, the individual's own nature, soul or truth) that caused the difficulty, sense of depression, and so on.

And so it is here with you, Matthew. Your personal breakthrough in this regard, will consequently be of untold value when you are therefore able to assist others to break through for themselves, in similar issues or crises. In this case, of the Oneness giving infinite Joy, and of the freedom of soul giving infinite purpose and meaning.

----------------------------------

Quote:
I can't get past the life is meaningless if we are all one bit too easily, and I have felt somewhat depressed by that today.  I find meaning in the love of my son and family, my work, my interactions with others.  If most of that is illusory, if merging with God into pure perception is the eventual goal, than my actions are not so much meaningful as they are necessary.


Contrary, contrary. The illusory or transient part, is only the form with which the essence underlies. The part that is *real*, is your connection, relationship and love that the forms are able to allow you to gain for yourself - the love for your son and family, your work, your interactions with others. It is the essence, the evolution, the love, that is the true purpose of all of these, that makes them completely real, meaningful.

The form serves the essence. The physical or manifested serves the spiritual. The body serves the soul. The interactions serve the relationship. The relationships serve the Love.

Merging into 'pure perception with God', or losing individuality, as the eventuality of existence, is one of the common misconceptions for many. How can you return to God when you have never left God? And how can you possibly ever leave God, when by definition God is the Essence, Totality and Simultaneity of All the Cosmos?

It is as if the hand fears merging with the body and losing it's individuality, while in truth, the body experiences itself as the totality, yet simultaneously the individuality, of all it's parts. Including as the silly hand that whose fear is but a false idea (false evidence appearing as real). For the hand will never lose its individuality, just as the body has never lost its universality. Indeed, the universality requires the individuality, and vice-versa. And both will exist simultaneously as One, forever.


Quote:
I think there are no answers that are absolute and some of it depresses me.


Ahh, but therein lies the beauty and joy of it all. Because the absolute, or 'sum of all perspectives', depends on the relative, or 'individual perspectives', what this translates to, is that the Universe is a joyful, participatory experience, in which each and every being matters! The greatest purpose and meaning behind existence, can only exist when there is free will and infinite possibilities. It is God is enjoying Him/Her/ItSelf with the experience as an infinitum of diverse Beings, unique perspectives, and unique explorations of existence. The free will of each being, is therefore the free will of God. Can this get any more 'absolute'? Tis the Divine beauty of it all.

------------------------------------

(Edited after initial post)
On free will giving greater purpose and meaning. How meaningful would it be if an individual is forced to help others solely out of threat of punishment? As compared to say, if he helped others solely out of compassion and love.

Imagine if a man could freely rape and kill everyone else in the world without any punishment whatsoever, even including karmic consequence; and yet should he chooses instead (ask yourself the question, if you were that man... and only your own answer, not the answers of others, is meaningful to you) to respect, care for them, and help them evolve in joy, ie. he chooses to love them, simply out of his true nature (which is always determined by free will, see here), simply because that is what he *truly wants*. Therein lies the true beauty, purpose and meaning of existence and free will.

-------------------------------------------

If there are 'absolute', pre-determined answers for everyone, which denies the reality of free will and unique perspectives, then there would be little meaning or purpose of that individual's existence. For the individual/part serves the universal/collective, every Being (or 'little self') serves his/her/its GodSelf - the Oneness that is manifested as All the Cosmos.



Quote:
I suppose if we were to consider ourselves merely a probe then that would be depressing.


Right, Kathy. It's not at all depressing when you realize the truth that you're far from being 'merely a probe'. The depression, as always (ie. as with all depression or suffering), is indicative of a false idea. That is because the probe, or body, is always a vehicle for something greater, the essence behind it. Therefore, the probe itself is a form, and the true essence of the form, of the probe, is the greater being behind it. The probe is therefore not the probe, but really the being who sent it.

Therefore, you are greater than who you think you are (the incarnated personality, the individual, etc), you are in reality the higher self, the oversoul/Disc, the GodSelf (manifesting Yourself simultaneously as All the Cosmos).


Quote:
Initially this came to me by small experiments that showed me that my thoughts could affect reality.  This was fun initially, but carried no moral uplifting feeling or love with it.


The 'moral' uplifting feeling or love, the evolution and assistantiality, will come in when you (give yourself the willingness to) recognize the greater context by which your contribution to reality exists in. It is as if by itself, the mechanical rotation of the harddisk seems meaningless (possibly even depressing!), but when it understands the greater context of the functioning of the entire computer, it is a joyful, meaningful, loving (Oneness) act.


In regards to the above discussion then, Hilarion speaks of this when he says the following.

Hilarion on "Universal Laws" audio CD-Rom :

"When taken to the higher, vibrational level, they become as if, the very Laws of Creation themselves, of the way in which, the matter, energy, interactions between them, ability for them to create purpose, to manifest Destiny, and eventually, return Love to God, actually then, is the path then created. As if those Laws themselves allow this."


Matthew, I will be sending you a private message.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Incarnation
Reply #71 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 10:49pm
 
Kyo,

As usual a wonderful and insightful post.  I did not truly have an existential crisis, so much as a temporary depression, because I felt that I intellectually "got it," with regard to the nature of the universe, but didn't feel it yet.

I agree with most of your points, as usual, but still am not sure I buy into the disc/probe model of consciousness.  As I said, separating ourselves from God must be artificial by its very nature.  Thus disc with thousands of probes is a construct that fosters an idea of separate but whole with God, similar to our earthly incarnation.

I would be interested in your take on my initial post on this thread.  If you believe in the reincarnaiton model, how would you answer my initial post?

Actually, I don't think you and Don are that far off in some ways.  A devout christian may see meaning in moving toward God, and serving one's purpose in helping one's fellow man along the way.  This is not inconsistent with your philosophy. 

I will check out that universal laws link.  Thank you. 

Matthew
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Kyo_Kusanagi
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 317
Re: Incarnation
Reply #72 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 11:01pm
 
Dear Matthew,

Quote:
If you believe in the reincarnaiton model, how would you answer my initial post?


I posted on Kardec's thread on Reincarnation :
Quote:
On the nature of Re-incarnation (aka 'existential seriality') then, because for there have been various, diverse views expressed on the true nature of Re-incarnation, including on other threads on this forum, the following is my contribution to the discussion :


On how Reincarnation of the individual soul works, across the fabric of space and time; and how Karma is worked through (ie. the function of karma) in the process of Incarnation and Reincarnation :
http://infinity.usanethosting.com/Heart.Of.God/WayOfKarma/index.htm


On how, as the soul evolves, it has greater participation in the planning of his/her own existential program (or 'life-script') for the upcoming lifetime - see "Retrocognitions" pg 60-87 :
http://infinity.usanethosting.com/Heart.Of.God/IAC/index.htm



Basically, my take on your question as per your initial post, can be understood from these materials. May I invite you to have a complete read (both links)?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ricardo
Junior Member
**
Offline


Spiritualist, Astral Traveler

Posts: 52
Chattanooga, Tn
Gender: male
Re: Incarnation
Reply #73 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 11:06pm
 
The disc probe model is hard to buy into...as is other
things but not being a devout christian anymore has changed my perpective totally on this and other things that the model as you call it implies..IMHO

Love, Ricardo Wink
Back to top
 

When you unite with me you are uniting without the ego, because I have renounced the ego in myself and therefore cannot unite with yours. Our union is therefore the way to renounce the ego in you.&&&&THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE UNIVERSE
WWW  
IP Logged
 
DocM
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 2168
Re: Incarnation
Reply #74 - Mar 9th, 2006 at 11:16pm
 
I read your links Kyo, thank you.  I suppose that someone who causes harm and is unrepentent, can still incarnate by your understanding from a lower plane or vibration or be pulled to the earth plane.

In the model of others on this board, these souls on death of the physical body would enter where their minds left off - in a hell of their own making.  Getting out of there to reincarnate would seem unlikely.  In your model of reincarnation, it seems souls are drawn back to the earth plane from all stages of spiritual evolution.  This is, quite different from other New Age beliefs - unless I misunderstand your link.

My issue with reincarnation is the notion of memory being an integral part of one's soul.  In the description of the philosophy in your link, you would say that memory was likely related only to personality or ego, which we shed, but not to the soul or essence (or am I putting words in your mouth here?).  I, Matthew have a core perception or essence, and yes some of it may have nothing to do with my memories and experiences, but much of it does.  Wipe out, even temporarily my past experiences, and I do not believe we would have the same Matthew.  Perception is direct, yes, but understanding comes with pure perception and the integration of experience.

My greater self, to which there is always a connection may retain past life memories, and in pointing to this, you may say that understanding is possible by finding your "greater self"/disc...
I understand the concept, but for most of the billions on the earth plane, few actually feel they have this connection.

So I am interested Kyo, in your take on my initial postulated example.

Matthew
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.