Quote:Yea...
You said that and backpeddled. You are saying animals arent constrained to physical time.... Though, physical time is an element of physical perception. A dimension of perception.
I dont get how their(animals) perceptions would appear not to be constrained to physical time. When physical time is the very thing in which is part of your own perception when perceiving them(animals).
Unless, i suppose, you mean that animals then appear to not be perceiving us and reality in a timeframe, but their perception is in a state of timelessness?...?
is that what you mean?
lol, totally confusing.
Ok, so you think that if a dog can sense its owners arrival, that event is indicative of a timelessness or appears to hold no element of physical time in how the animal perceives.??
No back peddling, I just worded what I meant rubbish the first time.
Ok this is just me thinking and typing at the same time.
In my view the current understanding of our human physical world through a human is 3d + 1t. I believe that animals also share elements of this reality but are not so restricted by it. We are animals so we are not so restricted by it either. Yet because we have had the "benefit" of an education we naturally percieve what we are taught to believe. By this I mean we focus our view into a perception that suits both our social and physical environment. We are influenced by other factors such as radiation, gravity, magnetism yet cannot perceive them using our own senses.
Light is not constrained by time. Does this mean that light ignores time? Does this mean that time is a constraint or a perception?
Now the dog/owner thing could be based on time or could be based on the owners thoughts. The experiments Sheldrake has done implies more of a link or bond between the dog and owner which could rule out the dogs perceiving the event in advance. Sheldrake talks of morphic fields, fields that are based on habit and repeated events(Not really doing the theory justice there but that is the basics). So the blue tits share a unified conscious field where by they tap into a shared collection of experiences. Is this conscious restricted to physical time?
The other notable experiment is the rats in the maze. Rats that have had no physical contact with other rats that have done a maze do notably better in that same maze after.
So looping back to my point about animals not being constrained to physical time I mean that it doesn’t constrain itself to a time waiting pattern as it doesn’t know when the owner is coming home.
So it either has a mechanism to perceive the event in advance or draws on the intention of the owner to come home. If it does either, it is doing something that we do not accept because we confine our selves to only what we know at present about our physical reality. We can try to explain it using what we know about our reality now but nothing can explain it.
These ideas seem crazy as a whole sometimes and its easy to dismiss them. Yet the fact remains that dogs will still know when there owner is coming home and will still detect epileptic seizures up to 45 minutes before they occur whether you dismiss these ideas or not.