Copyrighted Logo

css menu by Css3Menu.com


 

Bruce's 5th book, a Home Study Course, is now available.
Books & Tapes by Bruce Moen
    Bruce's Blog now at http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/blog....

  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print
The Testing of New Age Value Terms (Read 54712 times)
b2
Ex Member


Re: The Testing of New Age Value Terms
Reply #135 - Mar 1st, 2010 at 10:16am
 
Bikerchick, those are a lot of words for him to say...uhm, not so much. So, the passionate fantasies are a little bit distracting. They feed into other possible distractions, call them entities if you will. You'll relive them. Okay, got the message there. If you're healthy doing what you do I see no reason to start comparing yourselves to animals and classifying people as higher or lower than certain animals. Silly.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
betson
Super Member
*****
Offline


Afterlife Knowledge Member

Posts: 3445
SE USA
Gender: female
Re: The Testing of New Age Value Terms
Reply #136 - Mar 1st, 2010 at 11:37pm
 
Hi,

Steiner had an influence on US education and in other areas, but never as much as I thought he should, having only read bits and pieces of his ideas.
BikerChick, thanks for that quote. I think I know now why his influence has been limited.  Wink

Bets
Back to top
 

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Shakespeare
 
IP Logged
 
Berserk2
Super Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 844
Gender: male
Re: The Testing of New Age Value Terms
Reply #137 - Mar 31st, 2010 at 9:25pm
 
The use of spiritual jargon (higher self, astral realm, soul disk, Christ Consciousness, Akashic records, chakra) betrays beliefs, and beliefs can be fuzzy, inconsistent, and even unconscious.  Because beliefs can be unconscious, jargon can unwittingly prevent growth and and a healthy consideration of the possibility that one just might be mistaken in important ways.  So we should always strive to find new ways to label mysterious and poorly understood truths and experiences.  More importantly, we should employ a pragmatic concept of Truth.  For example, we should ask ourselves questions like these: if my beliefs in a higher self and a soul disk are fundamentally flawed, how could I ever discover this?
i might "pray" to my higher self instead of a personal God.  How am I to evaluate whether I am making a big mistake?  Perhaps I experience far more frequent and convincing answers to prayer if I pray to God.  Or perhaps I sense that when I pray to my higher self, I am unwittingly unleashing ego ratitifcation in a way that inhibits my experience of pure love.   Here I must be careful because "ego" is another elusive jargon word.  Or suppose I ask for a personal relationship with Jesus.  I might campare the emerging feelings and perceptions with what I experience when I ask for a closer relationship with impersonal guidance.  Then if the result is a confusing concoction of emotions that are hard to distinguish, I might try another question: e.g. Must I be willing to surrender to Jesus' will or my higher self before I can have self-authenticating experiences or insights that aid my journey and my belief choices?  In my view, this approach is more productive than looking for a never available objective proof for a particular New Age, philosophical, or Christian overview. 

Don
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print


This is a Peer Moderated Forum. You can report Posting Guideline violations.