Quote:Dear Freebird,
To be honest, from your fragmentary description, I doubt it was a real astral visit.
That's probably true. The most likely explanation is that it was just a dream. However, the question remains open whether the content of the dream was all coming from my own mind or whether it was influenced by spiritual input from a source outside of myself. I have had plenty of such dreams where it seemed that it might not have been produced as a random firing of neurons in my brain, but that there was a purpose behind it and it was given to me as an insight for spiritual growth.
Quote:Stephen LaBerge's research on lucid dreams has shown how easy it is to confuse OBEs and lucid dreams are. I'd wait until I had something verifiable in my apparent astral visit before embracing it as real.
It could be real without being an OBE. Perhaps some dreams can be a window into astral realms, while remaining just dreams. This could be true if the content of the dream is being influenced by spiritual entities or forces such as angels, demons, spirit guides, or God.
Quote:That said, your dream might be a prelude to a real OBE. The fact that this dream follows soon after your dream of two spiirit beings conversing about you makes me suspect that you are poised for a breakthrough. I hope so.
In the past few months I have had more spiritual dreams and other such experiences than usual, probably because I am taking an interest in issues of the soul and the afterlife more than before, and I have prayed to God on many occasions for spiritual guidance. The primary way God guides me seems to be in the form of vivid, meaningful dreams.
BTW, the experience I had of two spirit beings conversing about me took place in the hypnogogic state between sleep and wakefulness, while I was in the process of waking up, so it was not strictly a dream. It was dreamlike but a bit more real than just a dream. I would not classify it as a hallucination, though. It was something in between, which took place during the altered state of consciousness of being half-asleep. Maybe a special case of dreaming... hard to say. People seem to be more open to such things when they are in the hypnogogic state.
I've also had two very brief OBEs (or what felt like OBEs) during the past few months. The first one I came only partially out of the body -- only my legs came out. The second one I came out completely, but only for a couple seconds and then was slammed back in. Both of these experiences were associated with the hypnogogic state. In fact, many of my visionary spiritual experiences over the years have come in the hypnogogic state.
Quote:Betty Eade claims to have met her unborn future adopted daughter in her NDE, but is adamant that this implies the soul's preexistence rather than reincarnation.
Many people who have NDEs are adamant about a whole lot of ideas they got from their experience on the other side -- and sadly, NDEs contradict one another on all kinds of significant issues, including reincarnation. I have tried to draw theological conclusions from reading lots of NDE stories, and honestly, the more of them I read, the more I realize that very few conclusions can be drawn about specific issues, including reincarnation. That's because a variety of believable people report very different things about the afterlife that they learned from their NDE. Either some people are lying, or else NDEs are largely a product of people's own subconscious mind, or else a large part of what people are told or shown during NDEs is intended only for their own consumption, not to prove anything to other people other than a general sense that there is some kind of life after death.
Quote:As you know, preexistence was a widespread Jewish and Christian teaching in late antiquity. Perhaps, your latest dream, real astral visit or not, might sharpen your intuition and help you consolidate your position on this controversial distinction. How do you feel about that question?
I feel that my dream could be consistent with either reincarnation or no reincarnation, although my intuition tells me it is more consistent with reincarnation being a reality. Either way, I take no position on the issue of reincarnation, because there simply is too much conflicting evidence from NDEs to determine what I should believe, and I do not think the issue is important enough to my faith to feel it necessary to come to a firm conclusion. The Bible offers little on the subject, and presents several conflicting views of life after death within its own pages, including the soul-sleep until physical resurrection view, versus the immediate transition into a spiritual dimension view. I have decided the soul-sleep view is false, based on overwhelming NDE evidence, but anything beyond that about the specifics of the afterlife, I cannot be sure of. My intuition tells me that reincarnation is likely true in at least some cases, although what percentage of people reincarnate I have no idea.
One problem is that it may be impossible to distinguish between evidence for reincarnation and evidence for discarnate entity attachment or a collective unconscious and psychic phenomena. The biggest problem that is faced by anyone seeking to come to a conclusion about reincarnation is simply that many NDEs teach reincarnation and many others do not, or even adamantly reject it, and there is no correlation between the type of people and their experiences that would indicate that either pro-reincarnation or anti-reincarnation NDEs are inherently false or corrupted.
There are several other issues I do not take a firm position on. One of them is the whole creation-versus-evolution debate. I marvel at how many people debate on and on about this, feeling that which position one takes is essential to one's faith or apostasy. There is a lot of evidence for Darwinism and a lot of evidence against it, so it seems that the truth is unclear. And a person can be a good Christian either way, because the specific mechanism of how life came to be in its present form is basically irrelevant to one's Christianity, IMO. I would say reincarnation is a similar matter.
There are certain things one must believe for sure, including the literal crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ, which is a historical fact and the primary basis of Christian faith, and therefore cannot be denied. On the other hand, I don't see reincarnation as an issue that Christians must have a firm position about -- and in light of the conflicting evidence, perhaps we should not.
Freebird