Brendan
Ex Member
|
For those who don't know what a "Schmoo" is, it was an imaginary creature dreamed up by the immortal Al Capp, creator of "Lil' Abner" (perhaps the greatest comic strip of all time.) A Schmoo was a small, bowling-pin-shaped biped with a Hitler mustache which reproduced prolifically, was ecstatically happy at all times, and had a very loving disposition. So loving, in fact, that it would die of happiness if you wanted to eat it. That's right, there was no joy greater to a Schmoo than the thought of a human being eating him. Now society, as we all know, is based on greed, ambition, and competition. These things cause a lot of problems, to be sure. But without them - we'd have no cars. No airplanes. No antibiotics... Need I continue here? I find it quite interesting that war has been the kicker for most of the technology we've come up with (the Internet started as a Department of Defense Project which "escaped" into society at large, so to speak) and we have Hitler to thank for not only the V-2 rockets which terrorized London, but also Werner von Braun and Apollo 11 (the Apollo project being the direct result of German rocket experiments in the 1930s.) Without the "sins" I mentioned, at best we'd have a static, ingrown, primitive culture... sort of like China in the 1600's (after it more or less gave up on trade and exploration and adopted an isolationist foreign policy.) Certainly a society of Schmoos wouldn't be a functional one - if they survived joyfully feeding themselves to the tigers, they'd have a "civilization" at an animal level at best. So would we, if we didn't have selfish ambition. So why would "God" (or the All, the Force, or what have you) want people be like Schmoos? Why would he want us to have values which would give us a society on a technical par with animals, or cavemen at best? In this life, or a hypothetical hereafter? Surely, "selfishness" exists because it has OBJECTIVE VALUE for concious entities... What kind of world could Schmoos make, anyway? Certainly nothing an entity of infinite intelligence would find interesting... right? Thus, the idea of the "purpose of life" being simply to "grow in love" is a fluffy-bunny error. Consider crows. Crows are the most interesting birds in the world, because they are SMART. Watch your candy dish or the peanuts stored in your backpack when you leave it back at camp when you go hiking though, because crows are thieves. Crows are also MEAN. Ever seen a couple of crows (or even worse, their close cousins, magpies) tormenting a cat or squirrel? Now consider Down's syndrome cases. They are the sweetest, most loving people in the world. They are also the dumbest people in the world (and consequently the least interesting to talk to.) Selfish=SMART. Selfless+Loving=DUMB. Are we to believe that "God" wants humanity to behave in such a way that we can't maintain an operational society? To be like Schmoos, useless to ourselves and to others (except perhaps for aliens who might want to harvest us for food or slave labor, if such aliens existed.) This I cannot accept. Should I?
J-man
|