I use a grade from 0 - 10 (10 is the best/highest) on books and documents.


My Big TOE, three Volumes (+800 pages), 1 ed, 2003, Thomas Campbell

GRADE: (see individual Volumes below)


In the text below I use the word "Volume" to distinguish between the three
parts of the book. Campbell uses the word "Book" to describe one of the
three parts, but this is confusing as the book also can be found in an
on-line version of only one piece (one book).

My review is based on the version of the book presented in three separate parts
(three Volumes).

Campbell has further divided his book into a total of 6 Sections, each Section
consists of several chapters.

---


In the text below I sometimes use the word 'astral' to keep my text shorter,
where I in fact mean the 'non-physical reality', be it an OBE or a visit
to some world outside our physical universe.

Let me start with saying that I'm a little disappointed with the book.

One property of Campbell's book My Big TOE is that it is almost without
specific content most of the time.

It's amazing that Campbell manages to write a three Volumes book about the astral,
without providing the reader with any information or specific details about the
astral world.

One reason may be that Campbell doesn't want to pollute the reader's mind,
so when the reader one day manages to go OBE, that reader is not coloured
by Campbell's view of the astral. But still, the lack of specifics and
details are a big let-down of Campbell's three Volumes book.

Authors like Monroe, Moen, Muldoon, Leland and RB have lots of specific
details, their own experiences and plenty of information about the astral
in their books.

Campbell has almost nothing.

The upside of the book is that it is freely available at Goggle Books. Anyone
can read it on their own at no cost at all.

When visiting forums on astral matters, Campbell's book is often highly praised,
which I really can't understand having read it and found it to be of poor value.
To summarize things, Campbell's three Volumes book My Big TOE has the
following main characteristics:

1. The book is boring.
2. The book takes ages to come to the point.
3. The book repeats the same statements, in various forms, 20 or sometimes
   even 30-40 times. Reading seemingly endless variations on the same subjects
   such as "entropy", "evolution", "consciousness", "science", "reality" and
   similar, adds very little new understanding to the reader.

4. The book's many claims are either obvious, fuzzy or too general in content.
5. The book lacks content to back up the not-so-obvious claims of Campbell.
6. The book is both forward and backward referencing to the absurd, sometimes
   to chapters not really related to the subject currently read, in a way
   which adds nothing new or very little to the context.

7. The book at times contains lengthy enumerations of various objects, which
   doesn't add anything to the content, and makes the book even more boring.
8. The book lacks detailed descriptions and experiences of the non-physical.
9. The book deteriorates during the later half of each Volume, being particular
   boring and repetitious during the second half of Volume II.

10. The book at times, at least to me, radiates an aura of artificiality and
    not being too honest.
11. Most of Campbell's jokes (many in his asides) are boring. When Campbell tries to
    use sarcasm to be funny, even that fails to be fun, it's only becomes sarcasm.


From start to finish, it took me almost a year to read My Big Toe. During
that time I finished several other books.

I would have expected something more from a professor in physics.

---



My Big TOE: Awakening, Volume I, 1 ed, 2003, Thomas Campbell

GRADE: 5.5


At the beginning of Section 1, there is a handy list of abbreviations, which
Campbell uses through-out his book. I think he has listed almost all abbreviations
with a few exceptions (see for example page 193).

TOE stands for Theory Of Everything.

Before the actual text of the book start, there are several brief recommendations
from six persons with various academic backgrounds. They all highly praise
My Big TOE (TOE) in big words.

The brief recommendations are repeated in all 3 Volumes of TOE.

I also note that TOE gets high grades at amazon.com, which is a mystery to me.
But a few of the amazon reviewers has noticed that Campbell repeats a lot of text.

Campbell has a very bothersome style of writing. He seldom goes directly on the
subject. Instead Campbell starts any area with a long blurb of text, which
is very wordy and often contains little substance. Campbell's consistent use
of these blurbs of texts, both obfuscates the content and sags the reading
of his book. The book becomes a very slow read.

It's unclear to me why Campbell goes around beating the bush with his blurbs
of texts, as the reader certainly will try to figure out if there is anything
of value inside those blurbs, often becoming disappointed. I've seldom found
anything of value in those introductory blurbs. Campbell's extensive use of
blurbs of text, lowers the grade for his book.

In the preface, I'm also having a hard time with Campbell's use of the expression:
"profound mysteries and ancient secrets", as it is undefined.

Campbell further gives a lot of promises in the preface to his book, which I
later can't really say that he has fulfilled.

The preface contains one important piece of info, on some subjects there will
be "asides", text areas which stray from the main topic. These asides are
marked with a special dingbat symbol.

Campbell does a lot of repetition in his book, which also contribute to slowing
down the book in an odd and convoluted way. The problem starts already at the
Synopsis, before the table of content, where Campbell gives an outline of the
chapters. He then repeats his outline of chapters a second time in his preface.
One time would have been enough.

Repeating some parts, for example because they are important, could be a good
thing to do. But Campbell is repeating too many different matters too many times,
which have a negative effect on the book.

The initial part of the book also has too many wrappings; the brief recommendations,
the synopsis, the preface, the foreword and the introduction.

I would have expected a well educated person to be more direct, more clear and
to avoid repeating textual content by no good reason.


In the forewords, Campbell states that consciousness is the computer (page 34),
to me the "computer" is the same as the hardware. I think this statement is
important:

Consciousness = The Hardware

(Later I found out that Campbell thinks that consciousness also is the software)

In the forewords, Campbell also states:
"...you must grow your own Big TOE." (page 36)

Hmm..?

Will this book tell me anything about TOE, or is TOE a virtual concept, which can
change into anything? Most of Volume I goes on with quite vague formulations and
too little actual substance.


But Volume I has one good part.

Section 1 is very good and is about Campbell's background and childhood
experiences. Campbell mentions several details about his research at The
Monroe Institute (TMI), which at that time had a slightly longer name.

Section 1 is worth reading.

If Campbell had held the same high standard through out his book, as he does
in the Section 1, I would have given the book a much higher grade.


Section 2 is more convoluted and Campbell falls into a mode of repeating the
same things over and over again. He also seems to postpone the content of his
book, by pointing to Section 6 at the end of volume 3, not revealing in what
direction the book's content will go.

On occasions, Campbell seems so content with his own words and likes repetition
of his text too such a degree, that it eventually becomes silly as he urges
the reader to re-read the same sentences. His repetition strategy become a little
too much, for example Campbell's re-reading instructions on pages 136, 176 and 240,
of Volume I.

At times Campbell's style of writing turns into a dance with words, more than
containing anything of value. Perhaps I'm too old, I've seen too much, read too
much, which makes Campbell's book contain very little new info. Maybe a child
from 8th grade will get more value out of Campbell's book?

Campbell's AUO stands for Absolute Unbound Oneness, and is his hypothetical first
consciousness that everyone started from. AUO is kind of godlike and resembles
Monroe's Creator or Whole, or even RB's Source.

Later on Campbell uses the abbreviation AUM instead of AUO, to symbolize that
The One has evolved over time.


Section 2 contains a lot of talk with not too much of value about people's belief
systems trapping them and that science and astral phenomena are difficult matters
to join. It's a boring part of the book.


At times reading Campbell's book feels like reciting a slightly boring, slightly
repeating mantra:

Big TOE. Big TOE. Big TOE.
Entropy. Entropy. Entropy.
AUO. Big TOE. AOU. AOU.
Evolution. Big TOE. Big TOE.
Survival. Entropy. Big TOE.
AUM. Big TOE. Big TOE. AUM. AUM.


In Volume I, Campbell indicates that there might not exist a general TOE:

"...a comprehensive and complete Big TOE is relative to your perspective,
knowledge and limitations." (page 118)

Campbell makes me sigh. If I read the full book and finally get the answer,
that I have to create my own Big TOE, he certainly has written a huge bunch
of words, which could have been cut down into much fewer pages.

Campbell urges the reader to distinguish between beliefs and knowledges. He
also touches the subject of disbelief and sceptics. He fails to produce
anything new under the sun.

Sometimes Campbell uses very long sentences, which makes the reading harder
as the text content often is vague, and further lowers the grade of the book.


What's interesting is that Campbell is very positive to the concept of mysticism,
and the concept of Love.

Campbell praises mysticism alongside science. He also introduces the postulate
that any non-physical reality, outside the physical, will affect the physical
but not so much the other way around. And there may be layers of non-physical
realities which affect the innermost realities.

But he provides almost no experiences of his own to strengthen his claims.


Campbell also urges the reader to read a book called Flatland from the
year 1884, to understand higher "astral" dimensions. The book Flatland was a
political statement in a time when political criticism was disallowed and books
like Gulliver's Travels had a high time.

In one aside, Campbell gives some advice how to go about doing meditation and
how to construct your own mantra, around pages 175 - 178. May possible be
worth reading, unless you have more thorough meditation sources.

At times reading Volume I is a little disturbing, because I as a reader am
very uncertain where the book is heading, if it is heading anywhere at all.
It's so unclear at what goal Campbell is heading during most of Volume I.

According to Campbell, Big TOE must stand on at least one mystical leg.
Mathematics alone can not produce a Big TOE.

A Big TOE without any mystical connotation, must with necessary be incorrect,
(pages 185 - 186).

One half in making a Big TOE, is the need for the existence of a consciousness
that apparently is an infinite Absolute Unbound Oneness (AUO), page 191 Volume I,
from which we all have emerged as tiny parts.

The other half needed for making a TOE is something called the Fundamental
Process of Evolution.

I would have hope that a physicist wouldn't have made such vague and unclear
statements. Campbell then has great problems construction anything meaningful
out of those two "halves", which makes his TOE drift aimlessly in space for
the most of Volume I.


Campbell's book is also disturbing in the way, that it quite often points forward,
to chapters/sections to come. That style of writing creates two problems. The first
problem is that the reader may feel that the "current" chapter is of little value,
which it often is because the content is vague and fuzzy. The second problem
Campbell creates, is the irritating feeling that the reader will have to wait
for a long time, until anything of value will be reached in the book.


In Section 2 Campbell talks about entropy, but if you already know what that is,
you will perhaps expect Campbell to explain how entropy fits into the picture of
the non-physical reality. That's not what is going to happen. Instead entropy
becomes a kind of "internal" state in consciousness, which increases the degree
of mysticism in Campbell's writing. Stating that evolution of the consciousness
is an improvement of entropy, gives little new info to the reader. Stating that
evolution of the consciousness is an improvement, that would have been enough.

Hmm...

Entropy.

There is an issue here.

The thermodynamic definition of entropy is that two objects, one warm and one
cold, will over time achieve the same temperature if they are close together in
space. Time and space.

You see?

Time and space.

Entropy is defined in terms of time-space in our physical reality. If there is
no time-space in the non-physical, how valid is the use of the concept "entropy"?

In Volume I, Campbell somehow indicates that the non-physical must have a time of
its own.


Regarding AUO, the first consciousness, the mind Campbell has given the abbreviation
AUO, who is not God, but kind of god-like. On page 208, Campbell makes the somewhat
strange remark that AUO's "external environment" can't be part of a Big TOE!

*cough*

I thought a TOE would cover a huge lot of things, but apparently it doesn't cover
the AUO's external environment, whatever that could be.

Now, if Campbell could have defined exactly what he means with an external or
internal environment of the AUO...

Campbell goes on to describe some ideas about the AUO, entropy and evolution.
I may either be too old or have read too many books, but nothing of the stuff
Campbell writes is new. And it is also sketchy, lacking substance, being
too wordy and very lengthy in text.

Perhaps the AUO concept is important? But I would have preferred it described
in less unclear words by Campbell.


I'm having a hard time swallowing that the astral should obey similar evolutionary
Laws of Nature that biology do. After all, non-physical reality is not made out of
physical matter. Because of that, it would have been good if Campbell had backed
up his often quite fuzzy "scientific" statements, with some experiences of his own.

In fact, it would have been good if Campbell had backed up _any_ of his claims,
with some experiences of his own, like Monroe, RB, Leland, Short, Ziewe or Buhlman
have done.


In the later part of Section 2, Campbell introduces the concept The Big Computer
(TBC), and declares that TBC is an equivalent to AUO's consciousness. Campbell
describes TBC in quite boring and lengthy terms, as it is a huge computer with
memory and processors.

Campbell seems to have some kind of problem finding anything interesting to describe,
and he often becomes wordy about things which are either just obvious or plain
contentless.


To bring something into concrete terms out of all those words, Campbell makes some
claims about his AUO concept:

* AUO somehow emerged in no-time, no-space and gained awareness (page 208 and others).
* AUO created duality, which other authors also have claimed (page 215).
* Then AUO somehow created time (also page 215), the first tick-tock.
* After that, AUO discovered space (page 217).
* AUO becomes "digital-thinking" as it evolves (page 246 and others).
* AUO eventually evolves into an Absolute Unbound Manifold (AUM), (page 250).
* AUM has space-time as one of many internal environments (page 256).

To back his claims, Campbell has some simple diagrams on pages 216 & 217, which are
not enough to convince me that he has explained anything.

Specially, I would have liked some experience of Campbell, to back his claim that
the AUO-AUM consciousness became "digital".

A little later Campbell seems to change his mind about what was discovered and what
was invented. He claims that AUM created space-time in the sense of an invention,
on page 256-257.


Campbell calls the smallest time increment to AUM, for "fundamental time quantum".
Such a claim requires some assumptions to be correct (page 259):

1. There suddenly exists time where there has been no-time earlier.
2. Time is quantified in increments.
3. Something "astral", changes in accordance with this time increment.
4. Physical matter ticks by a (different) time increment too.
5. All time increments must have the same length.

Campbell, who should be a scientist, doesn't back up his claim about a quantified
time increment in the non-physical. He reports no observations that this is true.

I would have wanted Campbell to state his experiences to back his claim,
specially as we have not in our physical universe been able to prove that
there exists a quantified time increment.

I must say that Campbell does a poor job of explaining what he means by space and
by time in relation to the non-physical. He can't make it sound sane. But he claims
that physical space is an illusion. Maybe he is right?

But I would have liked the experience described, which backs his claim. A story
like Monroe, Short, Moen or RB tell. I can accept an experience, but unbacked
claims doesn't convince me.


At the end of Volume I, all Campbell's small asides becomes bothering, as they
add very little to the content as a whole. It's also annoying that Campbell constantly
points to the end Section in Volume III, and at the same time gives the reader an
impression that all Sections before the end Section has to be read, to fully
understand the end Section of Campbell's book.

A 'reality cell' is Campbell's equivalent to a Monroe Locale III universe.
Sometimes Campbell mixes similar expressions and doesn't seem to be able to
make up his mind what expression to use. 'Reality cell' is also called
'other reality systems', and our reality cell is abbreviated OS (Our System).

Campbell comes with various claims about his AUM concept. For example that there
is an upper limit to the number of 'reality cells' to the AUM-digital-system, as
he sees the AUM as both being computer, programmer and operating system.

But Campbell doesn't give the reader any description on how he has acquired this
knowledge, so to me it hangs thin in the air as yet another unsubstantiated claim.

Also, when Campbell claims that there is a minimum DELTA-t time increment, he
should have said at least one word about how he has managed to measure time at
all, in the astral. I don't think anyone has succeeded measuring astral time
or any non-physical time. So any claim about how increments of time are divided
has to stand on solid ground, which Campbell this far has failed to provide.

Campbell would have won a lot by putting more structure into his claims and he
could remove some of his large, mostly pointless text portions which often only
state the obvious.



My Big TOE: Discovery, Volume II, 1 ed, 2003, Thomas Campbell

GRADE: 2.0


The corner stone of Volume II is that it is almost content free in regards
of anything new, not already mentioned in Volume I.

Campbell repeats the exact same synopsis, acknowledgement, preface and foreword as
he has in Volume I. I would really have liked him trim down at least the foreword.
Repeating the exact same text doesn't make it better. It just makes the read more
boring. (In the one-piece book (all Volumes in one), this repetition is not done.)

On page 41, Campbell repeats the same synopsis which he already has written on
page 9, and it is the part of the synopsis from Volume I. I have no idea why he
decided to twice repeat the synopsis from the previous book.

Some claims by Campbell.

* Big TOE has to be mystical, it has to deal with mysticism.
* AUM is _not_ infinite.
* AUM experiences change as the smallest DELTA-t time increment possible.
* Campbell on PUL: "Love is the result of low-entropy consciousness." (page 49).
* The future has not happened yet, so you can't go _into_ the future, you can only
  go to a _probable_ future scenario.

In Volume II, Campbell writes a lot about the "right" or "wrong" choice, and
"good" and "bad" motivations. Page up and page down. But very little of Campbell's
writings seem to have anything to do with the astral or a TOE. I consider the
initial part of Volume II having almost no usefulness, as it just states the
obvious of everyday life.

By now it has become very clear that Campbell's TOE is only in relation to
AUM's (the "god"/superconscious) mind, as Campbell claims that conditions and
details which interacts with anything outside AUM is of no (!) interest for TOE,
see page 72.

Around pages 103 - 109 Campbell has a very long aside (and an aside inside the
aside), which discusses computers' consciousnesses. Problem is that he makes
a poor effort to define what he mean with consciousness, and the whole aside
changes direction over the pages and leaves the reader with very little solid
info. I also wonder why he puts this computer-aside in the book? Maybe it
could be because he thinks that the computers consciousness is connected
to the non-physical reality, scrapping the hardware doesn't alter it?

Campbell produces another pointless one-liner in _bold_ at page 109:
"Organization is the ultimate form of energy."

Long boring descriptions of the ego, desires, some aspects of consciousness,
synergy and how it relates to consciousness. And a small passage on love.

  I didn't read all of My Big TOE--mostly because i didn't see the point since i got the gist of what was being, as you noted, often repeated. 

  I think there is plenty of good/helpful info in the book, and ultimately, it may be a sort of a moral code in disguise, but one thing i wish there was more of in the book is talking about techniques and methods to help us find out for ourselves our own Big TOE.  There is a little talk about the void and how to experience same, but it's more of a side note. 

  I disagree with the advice on and about the void to some extent anyways.  To me, the void state that he recommends is the same old, same old, Eastern over Yin/Right brain state of being of almost complete stillness, quietness, and receptivity.  There is value in in learning to quiet the "monkey mind" for sure, but it's not the end all for the meditative process. 

  I prefer the Hemi-Sync like state of being wherein the Right and Left brain work together in unison, wherein the receptive, still part of us and the active, thinking, creating part of us merge, and we can use whatever is most helpful in the moment.  But yes, it would be helpful if My Big TOE placed more emphasis on technique and methods, and explained these within the context of Consciousness and how Consciousness works according to the "rule sets" pre set up. 

   I've seen various replies from Tom to people at his forum, and i could feel and see holistic wisdom emanating from his advice/words, which is one of the reasons why i think Tom is the real deal.  I figure there may be deeper reasons of why he wrote his book the way he did, but since he is not a He/She type yet, there may be limitations and distortions of perception.   Actually, there has to be--it's really just a higher physics. 

  The more difference between one's wavelengths and that of the purely Creative Force within, which we are connected to by PUL, the more errors, limitations, and distortions of perception there can and will be in one's personal TOE. 

   Many at Tom's forum, seem to think and seem to treat Tom if he is an infallible guru figure, and it would probably be helpful if he actively curtailed this kind of perception and mystique of him.  In some ways, he seems to foster this mystique--especially through allowing the main moderator of that site to clearly and powerfully put him on a guru type pedestal.   That moderator is clearly obsessed with Tom, his work, and his "special relationship" with the powerful, infallible guru that he thinks Tom is. 

  This is very limiting, and Tom has been asked to wake up to this. 

Somewhere within his book Tom wrote that he and Robert Monroe considered what Seth says when they tried to figure things out. Tom also wrote that one should have a mind that is both open and discerning. I don't know what Seth books he and Robert Monroe read, but both "Seth Speaks" and "A Nature of a Personal Reality" say things related to Jesus that seem quite false to me.

If Tom read the two Seth books I mentioned above, I wonder why he didn't notice that Seth said some bogus things about Jesus. Could it be because his feelings towards Jesus are tarnished by fundamentalist Christianity to an extent where he can't find the need to use an open and "discerning" mind when he considers what a source such as Seth says?

The same is true with Kurt Leland. I have two of his books. I find it odd that in one of his books he refers in depth to what Emanuel Swedenborg said yet he's such a big fan of Seth. He tried to channel Seth for a while. Played around with an Ouija board. Eventually he made contact with a being he calls Charles and he channels this being. Why did Kurt Leland fail to recognize some of the preposterous things Seth said about Jesus? Kurt's books are interesting reading, but his viewpoints of what happens after death are quite different than what many others have found and some of things he said are hard to believe.   

If you mean what Seth said, I explain on the link I provided.

PauliEffectt wrote on Apr 12^th, 2012 at 8:07pm:

PauliEffectt wrote on Apr 13^th, 2012 at 6:51am:


  It's clear, PauliEffectt, that you have not communicated with expanded nonphysical guidance re: Yeshua.  My experience, is quite literally all expanded nonphysical guidance types (that i have communicated with) have the utmost respect and Love for this super expanded Consciousness.

He and his life and pattern is even well known in other Galaxies and other Universes /realities.  Every mature consciousness in existence wants to grow up to be like him someday.

Expanded nonphysical guidance types, know that a non religious understanding and focus on Yeshua and his example, tends to have a spiritually liberating effect on others. 

For Seth to minimize this example, to degrade this example, is highly suspect and it means that either Jane Roberts was spouting her own limited and erroneous beliefs through the guise of channeling, or she was channeling a hindering or ignorant nonphysical.  Either way, why would anyone with real experience and discernment listen to "Seth"?

Quote:

Well, as F DeMarco has said at one time when he didn't want to believe in his
guides, if they didn't fulfill his expectations, the guides acted in a style so
they would seem to fulfill his wishes. If his guides had not, he would have
stopped believing in them, and his guides didn't want that development.

Perhaps your guides do the same? They fulfill your expectations in the hope
that they still are able to reach you.

That's partly why NDE for an Indian and a Catholic are quite different. Their
expectations drive what they get to see, or who they get to meet in the astral,
be it Jesus or a Death Deity.

So perhaps Seth was trying to help people release their belief burdens?

To prevent them from being chained by beliefs?

PauliEffectt wrote on Apr 13^th, 2012 at 7:53pm:


  Belief burdens?  Beliefs are only "burdens" if they are inherently limiting and/or erroneous in nature.  How, exactly, is believing that a fellow human became such a pure/open channel of PUL that he completely liberated himself and thus became truly and completely "enLightened" as to overcoming all human, material limitations and telling others they can do the same if they live/chose like he did, a limiting belief?   Hmm, sounds a lot like Bob Monroe's most mature person living in his space/time cycle...   But, i suppose "He/She" is the actress Glenn Close?

  Re: guidance, Frank DeMarco, expectations, etc., my experience with guidance has not paralleled Franks whatsoever.  I've gone with certain beliefs, preconceptions, or ideas to guidance, but decided to be truly humble and to ask with no preconceptions about something, and have been told things which contradicted my prior preconceptions or inclinations. 

   Two recent examples from my experience "log".  I thought it likely that my wife and Rosalind McKnight might be part of the same immediate Disk.  I brought the question to Guidance under more ideal conditions.  I was told no.  I was told that Melissa Jager was part of her Disk though.  A name i barely remembered consciously and was quite surprised to "hear" (i was also a bit surprised to hear the "no" part to begin with). 

  Another recent example, for a bit, i was suspicious of the poster Wonderer, and questioned his intentions, thinking that perhaps they were deceptive or negative to some degree.  I brought the issue to guidance, under more ideal conditions, and told he was a rather old Soul and his intentions were basically loving in nature.  Quite a difference from what my personality self had been thinking and wondering.

   I don't get told things based on what i want to to believe, or previously believe or conceive.   I've long been interested in truth and humble or aware enough to know that my personality, conscious mind, doesn't always know what is expanded truth or not (despite that i've always remembered being a rather accurately intuitive person). 

Re: Yeshua, i've never have been religious in this life, nor have i been interested in religious dogma.  Since age 13, i've been intensely interested in researching and knowing about nonphysical/spiritual reality outside of dogmas or organized beliefs.  I started practicing meditation then, and i would get intuitive downloads (often at night when relaxing) wherein i was told about things like the Oneness of Consciousness, the important of Universal Love, the coming Earth changes, etc

  Re: NDE's, beliefs, and Yeshua, well i've read a number of NDE's, and while prior strong beliefs sometimes do influence a person's interpretation and/or translation of their experiences, this certainly is not always the case by any means.  I remember reading a NDE from a woman who was Jewish with little interest in and no "belief" in Yeshua, who had an experience with Yeshua and realized first hand that he was the real deal and the "Messiah" that her people have long denied.   Interestingly, she saw that he had reddish colored hair. 

This is very interesting since a few other unrelated sources all describe Yeshua as having reddish hair.  Edgar Cayce's guidance, Joe McMoneagle's remote viewing session initiated by Bob Monroe, and the prophecies found in the Dead Sea Scrolls.  Reddish hair is the most rare coloring in the world, and particularly not common amongst Hebrew/Israeli/Palestinian people's.  Nor in popular art or cultural references is he usually associated with reddish hair.

  Perhaps there is a bit of "projection" going on with your label attaching to others of being chained to belief burdens, etc.  I've read some of your experiences with "guidance" or "guides", which did not seem like you were in touch with real guidance, but with hindering, slow vibratory influences.  No wonder you would support Seth's "truth" over Yeshua's, for you don't seem to apply discernment or discrimination to your own experiences, perceptions, etc. 

  I've learned the hard way the importance of applying discernment and discrimination to psychic receiving of info, and have learned through experience that there are very much misleading and hindering forces out there.   One of their main targets, often, is Yeshua because of the fact that he and his example can help to spiritually liberate others.  These misleading, hindering, ill intentioned forces constantly try to minimize, twist, marginalize, and/or deceive others about this Teacher and his life and example.  Most often, they deny or falsify about either the crucifixion and/or the resurrection.   Sometimes they are even more clever, and claim to be him and to help write a book that has a limiting, brainwashing affect on others, hooking people with some truth mixed in with limiting falsehoods.  Also they have created religious institutions and dogmas which often distract people from his real teachings and example.

   If you are actually interested in truth, and finding out what's more true from more expanded perspectives, then i highly suggest you practice two techniques in conjunction.  One--make and sincerely state an affirmation of your deep desire to get guidance and help from only the most spiritually expanded, aware, constructive, and PUL attuned sources, and before asking your questions, practice Bruce Moen's "remembering the feeling of Love" technique or something similar (feeling/thinking gratitude is also quite helpful), and then get deep and still in meditation and ask your questions with no preconceptions. 

   These are ways to help self bypass one's natural, "Like attracts, begets, and resonates with Like" reactions, and to bypass misleading and hindering forces which seek to create limiting and false belief systems. 

   Do these and ask about Yeshua and/or Seth, and then we can have a real dialogue.   For, i do ask questions under these more ideal conditions and have been given a number of messages involving Yeshua--sometimes without consciously seeking them (usually these latter happen in the form of dreams). 

  Are you interested in expanded truth, or believing in what you want to believe based on preconceptions or prejudice?

Any guide with enough PUL can take on the appearance of Jesus or whatever deity you want.