So... when can you interview Bruce or me or other folks from this forum? (-;

As a researcher I am a developer. I develop tools (in similar way like programmers write their software; human instrument is my hardware, and the mind/consciousness is my operating system, so to speak), cybernetic models and concepts related to consciousness and so called non-physical exploration (which covers a lot of afterlife topics). By tools I mean sonic productions that affect and guide inner experience. Plus - I an author, and I'm writing scripts for various kind experience based explorations and meditations.

I'd like to emphasize here the "developer" aspect of my work. To my view, while "mainstream science" is still too often focused on common adoration of fellow PhD scientists and agreements to certain concepts while disagreement to others - "mainstream software writting" (if you type in google general words related to science and general words related to programming - you will find, that programming has similar degree of ratings) is much simpler and stands for effectiveness and contextual usability (either the software works or crashes, either the software works for certain topics or not). There is no adoration here; in other words - you can't sell not working or incomplete software but you can sell not working or incomplete scientific theory.

Hope that helps.