Hi--

Frequency generators have been mentionned at various times here. I don't know if this is related but --
the FDA quietly held a trial for a man involved in using and promoting frequency generators to kill bacteria, listen to celestial noise etc  ( which even involves BOINC and SETI.)
His name is Jim Folsom and he has been given a prison sentence for it of 140 years.

Google the main words for fuller information.

Bets

Thanks Lucy,

I appreciate your ability to get fuller information.
The notice I received about the FDA's involvement was an e-mail from a website on plant (botanical) consciousness. I don't know how they got involved, as I just recently started getting their info.

I suppose I thought certain types of cells could be targeted because I thought chemo treatments for cancer can do that. But I have no scientific knowledge.

Bets

Yeah you wonder why the plant site was interested; too bad they didn't provide commentary.

Actually I think it all can sound very confusing. There may be something unconventional out there that could target errant cells. On the other hand, marketing a device like that without the substantiating information is pretty ...well, out of it.

There are times when you can do things because you can focus the energy. Lasers can be focused.

There are times when you might be able to alter the errant cells and then do something to them. I think I've heard proposals like that. I don't keep up with this stuff. But for example, you can make flourescent molecules stick to particular cells, and then make those cells flouresce. So you pick out particular cells. But I know of that as an in vitro ( "in glass" i.e. outside the living body), diagnostic type thing, not an in vivo kind of treatment. But you did target something, so the idea of targeting starts to sound feasible.

So what do the Barbara Brennan type healers target? Don't know. I have trouble thinking of PUL as something that can be measured by a device. But there might be something else that could be. When James Clerk Maxwell first proposed his electromagnetic theory, I've heard that some members of the scientific community laughed and scoffed at him. (Maxwell is up there with Newton and Einstein).

So the plant people being interested in cells being targeted by..something.. kind of makes sense. How well has that phenomena where plants who are targeted by positive thoughts do better been studied? But this Folsom guy came to the market without much to support him, and as the lawyers pointed out, the FDA is pretty clear about certain things and it is easy to find out what those things are.

Hi Bets-

I'm putting a link here to an MIT news story because I think the info illustrates how conventional science is trying to target specific cells. Remember that this stuff has only been done in mice.

This guy is undoubtedly a whiz and deserves all the crdit he gets, yet I think it is important to realize that many people have been working towards this goal for a long time. He gets the benefit of a lot of work that has gone before him. I don't see science as being like it was when Mendal did his work alone at a monastery. Today it is really a collaborative effort. And I bet he (the MIT guy) never has to wash dishes! That said, this is interesting and I think this version is easy to read. And I thought of you immediately when I heard this on the radio this AM!

So the electromagnet folks are trying to do this is another way, but you need something to modify the target cells so you can selectively pick them off. This MIT guy just succeeded somewhat.

And this doesn't mean that there isn't yet another layer where PUL just works anyway.

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2009/lemelson-mit-0303.html

Quote:


They update their blog page; try this page:

http://greenandassociates.blogspot.com/2009/02/attorney-alternative-heath-care-d...