hawkeye wrote on Oct 26th, 2007 at 3:43pm:Ahso...What do you mean by vegs lose their vitamin and vitality values when even slightly old? You can't really believe that nonsense? So when fruit or vegs get ripe, they are not as good for you as when they are un-ripe? I don't think so. Thats what the stores want you to believe. Use less, throw it out early, and buy more. (to give them more profits.) They are in the business of selling you things that you don't need. They sure sold you, if its correct what I think you are saying.
Hi Joe, i will try to explain better. We could go REALLY indepth into all this, but i will try to keep it brief. The moment a living plant, or what not, gets plucked from the ground, it's vitality, its life force starts to dissipate. This is seen partially in its enzymatic content both decreasing yet conversely becoming more active, but its mostly a nonphysical energy thing.
Particularly the healthiest vegetables, those really easy to digest, to assimilate the nutrients, and which have decent amounts of nutrients to begin, such as Romain lettuce for example start to lose their food values quickly. Ideally, for maximum health, these should be eaten within the first two days of being picked. By the time it starts to wilt, both life force and vitamin wise, it's practically worthless though of course it is still better than eating processed and completely dead foods, such as the average american almost entirely subsists off of. Some, harder veggies don't lose their vitamin etc. content as quickly, but conversely these tend to be harder to digest to begin with such as carrots or broccoli, and so for maximum health benefit these need to be either lightly cooked, or juiced. Cooking of course, tends to decrease the life force energy of a food, though in some cases makes the vitamins and minerals easier to assimilate.
Fruit is a little different, it needs a certain amount of ripening (active enzymic conversion) for it to be well digested and assimilated in the human body, but even these should not be eaten over ripe for maximum health. Actually the best fruit is that which is vine or tree ripened, and you rarely find this in any food store--even organic/natural health food stores. Some claim vine ripened tomatoes, but that usually means that they have a part of vine attached to it when plucked unripe--not the same thing as letting it ripen completely on the completely alive vine. Truly vine ripened foods will contain much more life force, more vitamin and mineral contents, etc. There are so many layers to health and diet, that i would have to write at least 3 fairly long books to go completely into it.
But generally speaking, the fresher the better. The more live foods one consumes, the more alive the body-physical will be, its like attracts and begets like principle in operation.
As Rosie's guides so well oultined in her book Cosmic Journeys, those who are of a more dead and slow vibrating consciousness, will be attracted in an outer manner to that which both facilitates and also is dead and more slow vibrating in nature, in their foods (particularly large quantities of the denser meats like pork and beef), relationships, etc. Those who are vibrantly alive and fast vibrating within, tend to be attracted to alive and fast vibrating foods, etc. on the outside. Get fast enough vibrating and loving enough within, and you won't even need food anymore like "He/She" in Bob's book Ultimate Journey.
It is also better and more healthy to eat foods grown locally, beyond the obvious reasons of shipping time considerations, less pollution for the earth, etc. This is because this harmonizes the body-physical vibrations, with the vibrations of its immediate environ.
Quote:Its almost like the whole "organic" labeling thing....what cra_. Yea in just a few short years all the chemicals and fertilisers are gone from the soil and the food is free from them. What ever. Its just not true. Most of these things stay in the soil and the plants for decades if not forever. Not that they are not headed in the right direction but what is classed as "organic" in a lot of cases is just not.
Joe
I agree that percentage of organically labeled foods, are not all that organic, and probably not much better than some conventionally labeled foods. Its pretty relative, and a case by case issue.
However, there have been enough studies into pesticide residue levels, as found in both foods and in HUMANS, between organic labeled and conventionally labeled foods, to show that there IS a significant difference on average. One study i read about, took urine samples from various children, some children whose family ate mostly healthy and organic foods, and others in family's with more typical diets. The former showed a much lower pesticide residue in their urine. As mentioned, generally when randomly tested, the same type of foods, but the organic versions usually showed less levels of pesticide and other nasty stuff.
Other tests show that on average, organic foods tend to have a slightly higher ratio and variety of mineral content. I'm curious as to whether or not you buy organic because of your above assertions?
So, while some organic isn't much better than conventional, it's still usually BETTER, and in this world we oft have to go with the lesser of destructive influences. The best organic stuff, is usually locally produced by small farms run by people who really care about the environment and people's health. And beyond that, the best and healthiest foods are produced by those farmers with faster vibrating and more positive inner energies, for everything potentially influences everything else. A farmer who oft enjoys a good belly laugh, jokes or smiles often, and is kind to others will do more for his crop than the one who pays out tons of money for tons of crap, but who has a sour attitude towards life and others.
Oh, i've been "sold" alright, just not by any of the earthy, distorted vibrations.