betson wrote on Apr 12th, 2007 at 4:42pm:Dear Alysia,
You certainly set high standards! I'd not thought of forgiving him, at least yet anyway. Lol, I thought I was doing well to think to ask if he would feel any
relief that Tobias was freed.
Alysia said: ' ....just thought of another profound thought the person
whom this deed affected for 800 years is like the guard in a prison
system guarding the convicts. in a sense the guards are "in jail" too.
in forgiveness or retrieval acts, then both would be set free.'
Coincidentally (?) I will see him in 2 weeks. Since I only see him about once a year, that's convenient, eh? So I can let you know then.
Grumblemumble, so now I have to forgive him too? I thought I sort of did in the moments of amazement that followed Guidance telling me who it was, but my 'forgiveness' wasn't outright intent, more an emotional reaction. Hasn't there been discussion recently that says emotion preceeds intent? Does emotion then take the place of willful intent ?
Bets
Bets..you always could get me going..
I'm confused who this person is we're discussing. but don't want to ask if it's private. I'm also confused who is the lady who got maligned and it's like you're saying it's you when you ask me if you need to forgive the maligner whom was retrieved by you.
but I can discuss all this without know who is who by saying anytime you do a retrieval it is like you are excusing that person retrieved to find their level of "unstuckness."
so if you have an emotion which is similar to a nonjudgmental attitude, an allowance to let life out of jail, it is very close to the act of forgiveness if not exactly that. in the same way, forgiveness leads to PUL but is not the same thing, but close enough for the retriever and the helpers to work with it to enact a retrieval.
I don't think emotion proceeds intent, but desire may proceed intent. I don't see desire and emotional as quite the same thing.
we were discussing how: where one places their attention, then reality is created by that focus of attention.
so I think if you had the feeling you were correct, you did accomplish forgiveness and you were ready to do this retrieval. I was generating confusion as it seems like the victim is the one who should be doing the forgiving part..while a retrievers job is just as you said, not to be "fixing" anything but merely getting someone's attention. in my mind, I am forgiving folks of error, by seeing no error during retrievals and this is oneness concept, maybe as Dave calls it Monism. Pantheism another concept for at-one-ment, or atonement, to be at one with all life force, so I liken the act of retrieval to forgiveness and there will often be a sense of PUL in the area. or maybe the retrieval is only the beginning of a larger plan where the victim will become free, not just the victimizer. or, maybe the maligner, he has to go do his homework first but couldn't do it in jail. it sure looks like karma to me between these two and you were the interloper inbetween. ok, I hope I unconfused us both. let me know further developments.
I think you did good. pay no attention to my ramblings and give yourself a well deserved pat on the back!