Rob_Roy
|
Lucy,
That was a thoughful response. Thank you.
When others fail to resist their impulse to tell me about Iraq, I generally engage them nicely, ignore their presumption, and treat them as though their positions are credible (not usually), new and insightful (almost never), and worth listening to (they are as individuals, but not usually their recycled opinions). Sometimes they are using politics as a pretense to feel me out, because they have lost someone and I am a point of contact for them. I usually don't know who they are unless I engage them positively, so that is the biggest reason I don't argue with them or try to correct them.
What they don't understand, and I rarely tell them, those who are just being impetuous, is that I don't care about weapons of mass destruction, oil, seventy virgins, and so forth. I am usually thinking about a friend who came back and who lies in a coma, who visited me, debating whether he should pass or not (he won't). I am thinking about another friend who also came back in a coma, having suffered from third degree burns and other injuries for months before he died (he visited me too, afterwards). I'm thinking about others I know who passed and wondering who is next. These other people who see the war on t.v. only understand the difference in an abstract way, which is why the t.v. wins in their minds, it being something that makes a bigger, daily, impression upon them. They ought to see, in person, a greiving mother breaking down in front of hundreds of people, most of them vets, just for starters. They can do that here, without having to actually go to Iraq, where there are such mothers beyond count. Then maybe they'll begin to understand that their *opinions* about lies, WMD's, oil and so forth really don't mean a damn thing. This issue is **suffering**, writ large, and what we are now going to do about it. I don't think people are focused enough on this issue. Otherwise, they wouldn't approach a vet with their *political* opinions (grieving loved ones excepted).
I understand that this is happening for the highest good. I believe this. Ultimately, issues of WMD, oil, and the Bush's *apparent* (to him) motives pale beside this simple spiritual fact.
When people go on about Bush, and I agree with much of what they think , I'm also reminded that Bill Clinton failed to intervene during the holocaust in Rwanda, something he has said is the single biggest failure of his administration. Standing by when a million people are getting slaughtered with machetes is, to me, something that even Bush has a long way to catch up to. But again, there's the bigger picture and I cannot judge.
I agree that all opinions have merit, at least to the person that holds them. Someone may be *entitled* to their opinions, but I am not required to agree with them or even listen to them. But I am also aware that sometimes, often, maybe always, everyone is a lesson and what that lesson actually is may not be immediately apparent. And I am a lesson for others as well.
I think the spiritual lessons are what's most important here, not politics, not even the war itself which is politics by other means.
Thanks again for your thoughtful response.
Love, Rob
|