I'm just back from Bedok Princess cinema where I caught Ron Howard's movie "The Da Vinci Code" based on Dan Brown's book, and the part of the movie I felt was really beautiful and deeply touching, was in the very last few moments of the movie in which Tom Hanks realizes the (supposedly) true location of  Mary Magdalene's tomb ("She rests at last beneath the starry skies..."), and kneels in deep reverence before it.

The feeling of the presence of  Mary Magdalene, and all of the higher spiritual energies that she represents, is such a deeply beautiful and powerful energy. That was *the* moment, of the entire movie.

So thereupon, I remembered  Mary Magdalene had a brief guest appearance on last year's 2005 Hilarion Winter Solstice channeling. So I check Jon C Fox's Hilairon.com, and lo and behold! I see Jon has posted up the transcript of the 2005 Hilarion Winter Solstice channeling (thanks to volunteer transcriber Lori Dunn!).
 

So here it is, our updated webpages :

Hilarion on Jesus Christ, Mother Mary and Mary Magdalene  :
http://infinity.usanethosting.com/Heart.Of.God/Hilarion/Hilarion_On_JesusChrist....

2005 Hilarion Winter Solstice channeling (our mirror) :
http://infinity.usanethosting.com/Heart.Of.God/Hilarion/WinterSolstice05.htm

  Some may be interested in this excerpt from a Cayce reading:

         10. (Q)  Is it true that Jesus in His youth loved Mary, Martha's
             sister as a sweetheart, or did He never have a sweetheart?
             (A)  Mary, the sister of Martha, was an harlot, - until the
             cleansing; and not one that Jesus would have loved, though He
             loved all.  The closer associations brought to the physical
             or filial love, were with the children - and not with those
             the age of the Master.
                                                 Reading 2067-7


 I find the last part interesting, cause it seem like Cayce's Source is saying that if it could be said that Yeshua had had any personal love for others, it most would have been with children (yet even then it was not limited at all).

Thank you for this Kyo. Do you have anything where Hilarion has talked about Maitreya?  Thank you.

With Love,
Mairlyn

Dear Mairlyn,

Hilarion hasn't mentioned Maiterya specifically, in the public channelings. Though one could always ask Hilarion anything of interest in a personal Reading.

If the day should come, dear Mairlyn, that you strongly feel the need to do a Hilarion Reading, and you're given symbols from your guides & helpers to encourage you to do so (the signs would be pretty clear, together with your own intention), you will surely receive the financial assistance from others around you, to help you do this.

If such a day comes (for yourself, or anyone whom you know could badly use a Hilarion Reading), let us (the people on Linn's forum, on Bruce's forum, etc) know. I'm confident there are many other willing folks like us, dear Mairlyn, who would be willing to contribute a bit of $$$ each, for genuine people sincere about this.

Love,
Kyo

Quote:

Quote:



Hi Kyo et al,

  I do agree with the above for the most part.  It's important not to get hung up on all the little details, etc, when looking at the life of Yeshua.  I believe his example, his pattern is the most important part..

  Yet, the above sounds like it is polarized almost completely to the right brain Archetype.

  One of the reasons why i really like Bruce's info, is that it seems rather balanced overall, kind of like the Hemi-Sync state.

  This state is where people and their happiness, growth, etc. is optimized.

  It seems that many are polarized to one or the other to some extent, and so there beingness and expression isn't optimal--and of course those who are of the predominant one or the other expression, believe their viewpoint is 'right', more accurate, etc. even if they don't overtly say so.

  Heart and Head, they need to be balanced.

   

Hi DocM,

The following link is for thee. Concerning the Magdalene Gospel. Makes interesting reading, and is quite spiritual. That is, out of the context of organised-religion.
Could it be that the shift of global consciousness is a move away from the institutionalized concept of religion to a more personal understanding of what the texts actually state. Could it be that we are moving through the violent times towards a more peaceful era. Perhaps, it really is 'end-of-times', that is, end of times for ignorance.

Link: http://www.webcom.com/gnosis/library/marygosp.htm

Regards

I and a friend have been experimenting with dowsing as a means of communication with guidance. It's a yes/no medium with messages clairvoyantly added on occasion.
I asked for a guide to assist and I got someone who, in Newton's explanation of things, is a member of my immediate soul cluster. He is a junior guide and far from infallible, but accurate in things except when predicting future events with precision. I have verified several things he's said with more senior guides.

"Were Jesus and Mary Magdelene lovers?"
Answer: Yes.

"Did they have children together?"
Answer: No.

I didn't get verification on these particular questions, but I'm a lot more inclined to believe him than a movie or a book. Not that any of this really matters.

Rob

Rob

 Hi Rob,

 I've a little experience with pendulums, and know someone who has more experience.

I know from both of these perspectives that questions for such things, need to be VERY specific.

 So, if you don't mind, could you and your friend ask another question?

 Something like, "Were Jesus and Mary M. lovers in a physical, sexual sense?"

 You might be surprised, because sometimes guides are quite literal, or like to use a situation to show us something.

 Anyways, Recoverer wrote Quote:


 Neither do i, but there are a few reasons why i believe this wasn't the case, besides Cayce saying it wasn't.  

 There is an interesting concept in the Cayce readings which i have experienced in life as well.

A woman asked Cayce how one could lose their sex drive if they wanted too.  

 He said that when and if during meditation the Kundalini energy consistently reaches the Pituitary gland--which corresponds to the Crown Chakra, then the drive is automatically lost.  

 This Crown stimulation is akin to the White Light experience, and often the seeing of the White Light is an indication that the energy has fully flowed through all the Chakras.  

 During the periods when i meditated very deeply and consistently, i noticed i didn't have any drive at all, it wasn't something i was trying to achieve or anything, it just happened. 

 During these various times, i was in my early 20's and have had quite a drive since puberty, though i practiced moderation in this aspect of my life (partly because of excesses in other lives in this regard, which created mucho karma).

But my meditation wasn't always consistent, or very deep, and after those periods, it would eventually and invaribly come back to more 'normal' again.

 Now it seems like Yeshua was oft in meditation and prayer, you could perhaps say that his life was one long constant meditation and prayer to a very deep and pure degree.  

 I really don't doubt that he had a full circle of energy flowing from his Base to his Crown, in fact this is one of the things which happens when someone becomes Enlightened, there is a continual circuit created between all the glands and Chakras and the aura becomes pure White Light.

  So if any of the above is true, and in my experience the Cayce readings are correct on this aspect of energy, then perhaps he just didn't have a sex drive at all after a certain point?

 And if didn't have a sex drive, then why have a lover?

 It would be pretty pointless, especially since he came specifically to teach, preach, and be an example of completely impersonal love to all--to the point where he even eschewed his own family.

 Having a lover would somewhat interfere with this message, because lovers are of a personal love.  I'm not saying that spiritual people can't have lovers, not at all, but rather if you came to the Earth for one thing and one thing only, to be an example of Universal and impersonal love, THEN it wouldn't make much sense.  Remember that even at age 12 he gently lectured his mother that he came for God's work, and wasn't here for family or personal love.  

 Besides, i believe Don brings up some rather logical points on this aspect as well.