check out about soul mates here, rings true for me.
we were discussing this awhile back.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IjcfST8C-M

Rings true for me too but do you really think she is channelling an Entity? I have always had a problem with 'channellers.'
Just tell us what you have found don't put the blame on some being ;)

I found this http://www.my-big-toe.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2817 and the last post, IMO, sums it up.

I don't have a problem with the idea of channelling, but think there is low level and high level. automatic writing is what Goldie was doing which is similar to channelling. Nowdays we don't have trance channellers all that much..which is how the Seth material got to us.
Nowdays you see more often that the original personality vocabulary and their belief system frame, is the filter the entity or guide is using.

when I first began my book for instance, it was a type of automatic writing of a part of me, from another lifetime, as I saw it. I referred to my guide as dead preacher. the prose was something you might see in 1910 literature. I had to go back and merge his style into my own style, but DP got me started on the book, so that was good.

I sometimes let him write thru me but for the most part I don't consider it's channelling. the two are one, his style merged into my own. I believe also Ann Rand made an appearance to help my thoughts get in order. I had much guidance during the time I wrote, and orbs and presences..and I believe ascended masters are interested in our world and do merge their energy field with ours on those occassions to produce inspiration for the masses.

other than that I have no problem with being one with all that is, as long as it doesn't have teeth... :)