Conversation Board | |
https://afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi
Forums >> Afterlife Knowledge >> Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century https://afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1173119373 Message started by juditha on Mar 5th, 2007 at 2:29pm |
Title: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century Post by juditha on Mar 5th, 2007 at 2:29pm
Hi Two mediums have told me and Deanna that we have lived many previous lives and we have always been twins through these lives and also this clairvoyant told Deanna that me and her were philosophers in the 18th century and we lived in Romania and people thought we were strange.
The clairvoyant said this was one of our past lives. Love and God bless Love Juditha |
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century Post by Marilyn Maitreya on Mar 6th, 2007 at 3:15pm
That's cool Juditha. Twins all the time huh? Have you tried to connect with any of these past lives? That's whats really cool.
Love, Mairlyn ;-) |
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century Post by OutOfBodyDude on Mar 6th, 2007 at 11:06pm
Guess what Juditha. Two mediums just told me that I was Sister Mary Clarence in my past life.
If anyone has seen Sister Act, feel free to laugh. |
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century Post by juditha on Mar 7th, 2007 at 6:59am
Hi OOBD I think the mediums got it wrong about you being sister Mary Clarence,i would say you were probably Thomas one of Jesus Diciples who doubted everything ::)
Love and God bless Love Juditha. |
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century Post by OutOfBodyDude on Mar 7th, 2007 at 6:22pm
Yeah right, I was probably Jesus.
|
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century Post by deanna on Mar 8th, 2007 at 3:44pm
hi outofbodydude how are you,you certainly have a great sense of humour ,what will it take for you to believe in jesus ,everyone needs jesus in their life because without jesus we are truly lost and alone but you have a right to your own beliefs and i wish you well my friend .
GOD SO LOVED THE WORLD THAT HE GAVE HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON JESUS LOVE DEANNA |
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18t Post by dave_a_mbs on Mar 8th, 2007 at 4:29pm
Hi J & D-
I'm interested in the era inwhich you two were philosophizing - twins should be easily tracked down out of the academics of the 1700s. As for Sister Mary Clarence (aka Dude), evidently she is having trouble adjusting to a male embodiment and is being macho in an effort to not look too nunnish. Perhaps she'll feel more adjusted to her actual gender after she accepts her feminine side more fully. There are lots of people like that in the world. dave |
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century Post by juditha on Mar 8th, 2007 at 5:24pm
Hi Dave we would love to trace it back to the 18th century about us being philosophers but dont know how to go about it,could you tell us how to trace it.
Love and God bless love juditha and Deanna |
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18th century Post by OutOfBodyDude on Mar 9th, 2007 at 12:44am
Sister Mary Clarence is a character played by Whoopie Goldberg in the movie Sister Act. LOL you see now why it is funny? Dave you think I don't accept my feminine side n act too macho?? Geeze we gotta hang out some time, I'm sure you'll change your mind. ;D
|
Title: Re: Juditha Deanna philosophers in 18t Post by dave_a_mbs on Mar 9th, 2007 at 4:37pm
Dude- Dialog always has a basis in reason - mst of us poke at the things we have trouble accepting - or do I misread the subconscious motive? - As one example, I have a really bad time with oppressive dykes - doubtless my Dutch ancestry. - So if it isn't Whoopee that prompted you, it must be in the content, and reaction to a prior life in a convent (as one option) comes to mind.
Juditha & Deanna - Bothof you are sensitives, so you should be able to read for one another. My suggestion would be to do a "silent reading" - either record your impressions on paper, or so softly that the words can't be heard. That way you don;t feed back to each other. Then compare notes and see the parallels, and notice especially the parts that specifically agree, and those that seem to have a similar "feeling", even if the details differ. My guess is that you'll come up with a general idea of the place and time, and a general setting in the sense of a school, church, social setting, organization to which you belonged, or a similar kind of setting. Another trick that I often use is when I regress someone I ask them to describe how people are dressed, what they are doing, what the location looks lke, and so on. Then I have found that most of the time it is also possible to summon spirits who have passed on to come and talk. The same trance state used for soul retrieval is quite sufficient for this, and you both have developed it even further in order to do readings. You might also be able to summon one another's "higher self" (meaning the end of the soul that is plugged into the Godhead) since that is a spiritual part that is always in the spirit world. One of the bizarre games that hypnotists sometimes play is to go into trance together and develop a mutual setting in their inner space. There's no reason that you can't do that equally well, or even better, since you're both more spiritually developed than the average hypnotic technician. If this were to begin with the thought of developing the prior lifetime, the mutually developed setting would probably have many of the characteristics of the past location that you shared. Given this information you might also be able to look yourselves up in some kind of registar etc. Like looking up George's crewmates in the Titanic registry etc. Should be fun. I'll be looking for results. PUL d |
Conversation Board » Powered by YaBB 2.4! YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved. |