Conversation Board | |
https://afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi
Forums >> Afterlife Knowledge >> Verifying this stuff is all "For Real".. https://afterlife-knowledge.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1113974344 Message started by Brendan on Apr 19th, 2005 at 10:19pm |
Title: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real".. Post by Brendan on Apr 19th, 2005 at 10:19pm
As I've mentioned before, I am not a man of
faith. I require evidence, before I can take something seriously. Maybe that's a weakness... Here's something I've thought of, though. I would REALLY like to believe the ideas expressed on this site reflect universal truth (whatever that is.) To do that, though... I would have to learn to go out of body. (NOT one of my inborn talents, BTW.) But if I COULD do it... I'd see if it was possible to meet with one of the other posters here astrally. Both of us would then record what we discussed after coming "awake" and comparing notes. (Or even exchanging names...) If the information corresponded... then that would go a long way toward proving this stuff for me. Has anybody here ever done this experiment? And what results were there? Any comments welcome... |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Raphael on Apr 20th, 2005 at 6:05am
It has been done but not here. Also I can't come up with sources to back me up right now so...
What you must understand is that Bruxe Moen's students, even if they aren't going "OOB" DID come up with matching stories of their explorations. What would be more interestingthough is if you could meet dead people and ask them for things you didn't already knew. Then you could verify the info and voilŕ ! |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by MandyLynn on Apr 20th, 2005 at 6:15am
I posted yesterday my first experience. I think using a CD might be your best bet for immediate results of an OOBE. I find myself having trouble relaxing enough, and the CD helps me concentrate, and of course the CD produces waves in order to help you be successful in having an OOBE. Before meeting up with someone you should practice until you know you can succeed in an OOBE when you want. I am not at the point where I can just say I will have one that night and be successful at it. I hope this makes sense.
:D -MandyLynn |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real& Post by Mendel on Apr 20th, 2005 at 7:04am
Brendan,
What you are talking about for evidence is in my opinion, the holy grail experience of meeting in the astral and exchanging information. So far, the best I've done is visit someone by OBE, unknowingly to them (that is, they weren't OBE) and pick up info about them or their surroundings. Mutual meeting, where both parties are aware seems to be elusive for me so far. The first step in achieving this stuff for yourself is to learn how to OBE or use Bruce's method which is a form of "phasing" The book I started with for OBE's was Robert Peterson's free online book on How to OBE and What to Expect I think if you can reach the state of "strange" experiences you will be able to fuel your desire to continue exploring until you reach validating experiences of some sort. People often find that when they first OBE they're like "Wow! I'm more than my physical body" Then after more experiences, they begin to question it, because of the strange fantasy realities they encounter. Finally, they pick up validating information from another person (living or deceased) in spirit and the last skepticism is washed away. -mike |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by blackdot on Apr 20th, 2005 at 10:31am
I would have to learn to
go out of body. (NOT one of my inborn talents, BTW.) It is your in-born talent :), everyone is born ready. It is up to you to seek the truth and find they way. |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Legolas on Apr 24th, 2005 at 4:03pm
I had a partial OOBE (I got my leg out and I was so fascinated by it I didn't managed to get anything else out) and I have found suggestion helps a lot. Giving yourself suggestion before you go to sleep, nightly.
You'll have to play around with the suggestion to find out what works best for you. Also desire/intent. You have to really want it, (here's the kicker) believe that it can happen, and practice. I can't really give you suggestions as to body position because I've read about people that have them in all sorts. It shouldn't really take years like I hear some people say unless you've got some sort of unconscious belief that is blocking you. |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Berserk on Apr 24th, 2005 at 5:23pm
Brendan,
I've had a few OBEs and retrieval experiences, but I reluctantly came to realize over time that they were just particularly vivid lucid dreams. You might be interested in my post entitled "OBE and Phasing Evidence for an Afterlife" currently on page 6 of this site. There I discuss both the problems and the scienfific research on OBEs. I created that post before I read David Fontana's excellent chapter on OBEs in his magisterial book, "Is There an Afterlife: A Comprehensive Overview of the Evidence." You would find several of his chapters relevant to the issues that engage you. Also, our moderator, Bruce Moen, discusses his attempts at partnered exploration in his book, "A Voyage to Curiosity's Father." Don |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Brendan on Apr 24th, 2005 at 10:46pm
So. Berserk...
Would you be of the opinion that OBE's are simply "hallucinations of the brain" if you will? What is your take on "holographic reality", then... or the growing scientific notion that consciousness is a quantum phenomenon... that is, our brains are not "classical" (or Newtonian) computers? Or... would you maintain that consciousness is entirely a Newtonian, "billiard ball mechanistic" phenomenon rising as an epiphenomenon of electrochemical activity in the brain (and therefore, conciousness could be understood with an application of Newtonian, pre-1900 physics and chemistry?) I'm not saying you're wrong (scientifically), you may be correct about the physics for all I know. I'm just curious as to the scientific paradigm you're arguing from. If you're right and conciousness is purely Newtonian, I would have to conclude that skeptical atheism is the way to go (materialistic monism) while you would hew to the Cartesian "dualistic" concept of an objectively independent external material reality existing side by side with a "magic" or "spiritual" reality ruled over by the traditional Jewish tribal god. So... what is your paradigm? |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Berserk on Apr 25th, 2005 at 12:32pm
Brendan,
I've experienced or encountered just about every other aspect of the Christian paranormal realm, except a genuine OBE. But I'm unwilling to generalize from my own bogus OBEs and retrievals because I've never experienced a waking OBE and that might make all the difference. Also, I'm impressed by the many verifications that gifted astral adepts sometimes experience. I document some of the scientific verifications in my earlier "OBE and Phasing Evidence" post. But consider just 3 of Swedenborg's verifications. (1) He was a friend of the the recently deceased Dutch ambassador. The ambassador's widow was being harrassed by a silversmith for an unpaid bill. The widow suspected her husband had paid the bill, but couldn't find the receipt. Swedenborg offered to visit her husband in the afterlife and solve the mystery. The discarnate ambassador told Swedenborg to give his wife this message: look for a secret compartment in the top drawer of an upstairs bureau. The widow did so and found the missing receipt. This verification cannot be explained as ESP from any living mind. (2) The Queen of Sweden was grieving over her brother's death. Swedenborg visited he deceased brother, who disclosed the content of the queen's last letter to him. The Queen exclaimed, "No one alive knew the contents of that letter!" Of course this astral contact might also be explained as ESP. (3) Swedenborg was attending an academic conference in Gothenberg attended by some Europe's leading intellectuals (e.g. Immauel Kant). Suddenly, he phased to a different dimension that allowed him to travel to his hometown, Stockholm. He saw astrally that much of the city was ablaze, but consoled himself that the fire had stopped just short of his house. He announced all this to those present and it was all later confirmed. Swedenborg (d. 1772) lived before the era of telegraphs and telephones. No one at the conference could have known about the Great Fire of Stockholm by normal means. I think that spiritual seekers need to come to grips with the fact that the Newtonian model has largely been supplanted by quantum physics and relativity theory. String theory also seems promising as a potential way of establishing the existence of parallel dimensions that might correspond with heavenly and hellish realms. The holographic model is also promising. It fits well with biologist Rupert Sheldrake's experiments designed to demonstrate the "morphogenetic fields" in which each species participates. For example, over the decades he has experimented with how long rats take to master a maze over time. He found that, decades later, rats thousands of miles away improved their maze time with no obvious influence from Sheldrake's experimental rats. Apparently, "the collective unconscious" of the species allowed rats everywhere to communicate with each other and learn at some telepathic level. In this sense, some version of the holographic model may be a missing key to the mechanism of biological evolution. By the same token, the human collective unconscious may be a key to understanding the mechanism of human telepathy. Put simply, OBEs can be real, but does the "ghost" really leave the "machine"(= the body)? In the last part of his life, OBE adept Robert Monroe preferred the term "phasing" to "OBE." In my view, the classic view of the soul as a ghost within a machine is now obsolete. True, certain parts of the brain seem to govern certain mental functions (e.g. memory). But the will or core identity cannot be localized in any circumscribed area of the brain. It seems better to think of the brain on the analogy of a radio transmitter, with the mind (soul) existing in some nonspatial dimension. As for the holographic model, it might be useful for me to again quote from Howard Storm's NDE conversaton with "Jesus and the angels": "The angels refer to God in many ways, but the term most often used is The One. God is The One because God is the source of everything. There is NO THING other than God. Everything came from God and everything returns to God....The creation is entirely in the NOW to God. God's consciousness is the entire creation. Everything that was, and everything that will be is THIS MOMENT to God ("My Descent into Death," pp. 68-69). I think this understanding is quite compatible with both Scripture and Einstein's relativity theory. Modern Christian theology has much to gain from engaging modern physics, but the issues are very complicated. Don " |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Brendan on Apr 25th, 2005 at 11:05pm
Aha! A good answer, Don.
You essentially have stated the first Hermetic principle: "The ALL is MIND: The Universe is Mental." Have you read the "Kybalion" by "Three Intiates?" It is available as freeware on the Web... (just stay away from a site called "Summum" which takes the Kybalion and "perverts" it, so to speak.) I was impressed by this little book... although it was written in 1912, it was the first "spiritual" writing I encountered that did not offend scientific reason, abuse philosophy, or require "faith" (in a capricious or cruel entity.) I too reject dualism... AND you gave a pretty good rundown of "holographic reality" (as it were.) But how does that necessitate the god of the "Big Three" Western desert monotheisms? (Or any other established, organized religion?) Please explain... P.S. Emmanuel Swedenborg WAS an interesting fellow. As I understand, William Blake was greatly influenced by him... |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Berserk on Apr 27th, 2005 at 3:36pm
Brendan,
I prefer to stress the logical consistency of Christianity with the latest modern sicientific theories. These theories can also be made compatible with non-Western traditions like Zen Buddhism and therefore do not necessarily favor any one tradition's concept of "the Ultmate". In my view, the best scientific argument for Intelligent Design is made by microbiologist Michael Behe in his book, "Darwin's Black Box." Behe is referring to the modern study of living cells as "the dark box" that was impossible for scientists in Darwin's day to penetrate. Briefly, Behe demonstrates that each cell is governed by 6 systems (e.g. reproductive, etc.), each of which is irreducibly complex, i.e., not the product of tiiny incremental evolutinary upgrades over millions of years. To my knowledge, no evolutionist has been able to effectively challenge Behe's arguments. His case amounts to a scientific restatement of this old argument: if you had never seen a watch but found one along a beach, you would conclude upon closer examination that the watch was irreducibly complex in the sense that it was obviously intelligently designed and not the result of a long series of random events. That argument for the universe's intellgent design is vulnerable to the charge that it is a weak analogy, but Behe's case is not so vulnerable to this charge. Let me give you an example of why I appreciate a monistic spin on Christian theology. Paul develops the idea that the church is the corporate body of Christ and draws many inferences from this analogy. Two of his negected inferences particularly intrigue me. (!) He teaches that when one body part (e.g. the eye) suffers, the whole body suffers with it (1 Corinthians 12:26)." He does not just mean that the whole body SHOULD suffer; the pain speads through the body. If God is "The One" (to use Jesus' phrase in Storm's NDE) and if, at some level, humanity is one (e.g. in terms of the collective unconscious [Jung's phrase]), then Paul's point becomes more intelligible. Suppose I neglect the retarded or the poor in my church because I don't think they have much to offer. Paul is saying that my neglect will in some measure harm the entire church. The church's access to the Holy Spirit is a function of the degree of the church's loving harmony. In other words, the Christian needs to apply this principle to the apparent "losers" in his community: "Your success is my success; your failure is my failure." To reinforce the spiritual power of organic harmony, Paul adds this principle: "God gives "greater honor to the parts that lack it (12:24)." In part he is referring to the procreative powers of sex organs that we nevertheless feel the need to keep covered in public. I have seen this truth demonstrated in many ways, but let me give just two examples. (1) Though a committed Christian, I am also a skeptic by temperament. I've investigated many of the church's miracle claims over the years and this is what I've concluded: miracles claimed by the famous (e.g. televangelists) often do not stand up well to close scrutiny, but the miracles experienced by ordinary, often unimpressive believers are often as mind-blowing as the best of Gospel miracles. Let me give just 3 of many examples: (a) A deaf mute in my church was instantly healed. (b) My cousin Darlene's eye was badly torn by a tennis smash at close range. She needed surgery to try to save the eye. Some of her ordinary Christian friends prayed for her and she was instantly given "a brand new baby eye"(to use the phrase of the awestruck surgeon). Of course, no surgery was necessary. (c) In my youth, Ralph Cook was my Sunday School teacher. He was an honest, kindly man, but a boring teacher. But I'll never forget the Sunday he told us about his recent miracle. He had accidentally cut off his finger with a power saw. With adrenolin pumping, he grabbed the finger and put it back on his hand. The finger healed without a scar. I know Ralph was not making this up. I rarely find comparably impressive miracles in the ministry of the famous. In my view, God has a policy of reinforcing the truth that human consciousness is interconnected and that we can all contribute to the whole, regardless of our social standing. Jesus expresses the same thought when He teaches, "Whenever you did it [some act of compassion] to one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did it to me (Matthew 25:40)." I inadvertently benefitted from this principle as a teenager. My Dad sang in our choir and this meant I had to be in church an hour early for his choir practice. There was nothing to do; so I talked to Bernie, a retarded fellow who also had to be there early to get his ride. Bernie's impaired mental capacity prevented our conversations from being very interesting, but I liked Bernie's spirit. Then one day he gave me the shock of my life. He approached me with love in his eyes and said, "Don, I've been praying for you and I know God's going to make you a theologian some day." His speech to me that Sunday was extremely articulate, well beyond his normal capacity. yet it was as if the voice of God spoke to me through Bernie and I ultimately realized that he had tapped into my future destiny. At the time I had no desire to study theology or become a theology professor or minister and none of my educated adult advisors were suggesting such a career for me. I've often thought of Bernie's prophetic comment since I finally obtained my doctorate in religious studies. Brendan, if you want to read more about what I find really convincing in my Christian experience, read my post "God and Destiny" on p. 5 or 6 of this site. Also, I remind you that I will eventually focus on your questions and objections in my "A Fresh Look at Heaven" post; so you might periodically check in there. Don |
Title: The Awesome Power of Will... Post by Brendan on Apr 27th, 2005 at 8:23pm
If the universe is indeed "mental"... then some amazing feats are INDEED possible...
Your cousin's eye might have healed, for example, as a result of a great deal of "positive healing energy" directed by the "collective concentrated will" of your congregation. This would make sense in a "holographic reality" where we are all essentially manifestations of the same "thing" (as it were) and "separateness of persons" is a magnificently complex ILLUSION. Nobody wished her ill (in regards to her eye) and many ACTIVELY wished her WELL... and most importantly, BELIEVED it would help. In a holographic reality, it could just as well have been be the collective will of the congregation that saved her eye, as the action of an omnipotent "Big Daddy"... Or to take the case of your teacher... in extremis, WITHOUT A THOUGHT as to "Oh my God, I lost my finger" he literally put it back on! An extreme case of the same phenomenon which enables a 90-pound woman to lift a 2-ton car off of her baby. When I was about 7 years old, I stuck my left index finger into a wall socket and badly shocked/burned myself (I remember seeing smoke, smelling "burned meat", and a pea-sized spot on my fingertip was "powdery-white" (sounds like a 3rd-degree burn, does it not?) And it hurt like hell, too... but you know, all I was thinking was, "Mom told me not to put my finger into there..." I rushed to the bathroom, and covered the finger with toothpaste (I forget which brand) and squeezed it tightly for a long time... (I sometimes wonder what I was thinking... maybe that the "minty-cool toothpaste" would "cool" my finger or something...?) Somehow, I just KNEW it would work! The pain went away almost instantly, and when I washed off my finger... voila! NO SIGN OF INJURY, or pain! The "faith" (or innocent will?) of a little boy... I've never been baptized, for what it's worth - and my family never went to church, either. The memory is clear to me (if perhaps a bit distorted by time, but it is very vivid nonetheless...) I never told my parents about it... afraid I'd get in trouble!!! :D The reason, I suspect, that Christianity seems to produce so many "miracles" (which I DO believe science will someday explain, BTW!) is that here in America, Christian churches constitute the largest bodies of UNANIMOUS "collective will" which can be used to direct this "mental power" (if you please.) Two heads are better than one, as they say (and 100+ heads can be potentially powerful...) Indeed, were I to get, say, cancer... I might even notify an Internet prayer group, just to hedge my bets. But were I to recover, I would give due credit to the PRAYER GROUP and its unanimous, concentrated, collective will... not to some deity "out there". An interesting corrollary of this is why prayer for the safety of soldiers in wartime is so often INEFFECTIVE... the soldier has people at home praying FOR him... but the enemy counters this by wishing him "ill" as one of the enemy... so the (possibly quantum?) effect of "positive" prayer is canceled out by the "negative"... sort of Yin and Yang, if you will. And "Johnny comes home" in a body bag. (In the First World War, armies of both the Allies and Central Powers marched into battle claiming that "God was on their side"... it is interesting that the Central Powers and Allies in that war suffered about 50/50 casualties, when the dead and maimed were finally tallied up... maybe "God" wasn't there at Verdun, or the Somme?) By the same token, I'd have to ignore any claims of a "miracle" by say, a professional basketball player when he credited "God" or "prayer" for his team's victory... what about the other side's wishes/prayers??? (Or did one side "believe" they'd win more than the other, which now has us going in circles, I suppose...) Anyhow... today's food for thought... "The power of concentrated (especially collective!) WILL." Maybe "God" is... ALL OF US. Thank You, B-man |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Berserk on Apr 27th, 2005 at 10:30pm
Brendan,
I consider your dissent as an intelligent alternative position. I'm clear that I could never simply argue you or any skeptic into embracing my theistic interpretation. My only hope is that someday you'll have your own self-authenticating experiences of God's loving presence and intimate communion. Then these conversations might be more meaningful in retrospect. I share your skepticism part way. That is, I've learned from my many supernatural experiences that it is sometimes impossible to determine where divine intervention begins and where untapped mental powers end. Let me illustrate how this distinction can be important. A pretty Harvard artist was being victimized by an emotionally abusive and unfaithful husband. A Catholic at the time, Linda believed divorce was wrong. One day, she felt the need for a sign from God. So she randomly placed her finger in her Bible and came across an anti-divorce text. This practice is called bibliomancy and was used as far back as St. Francis. When I heard this, I smiled and demanded, "Gimme that Bible!" I then swiftly put my finger in at random and found that it pointed to a pro-divorce text. Linda was intially aghast but then smiled impishly and said, "So are you saying that your divine guidance trumps mine?" "No, Linda, one day I thought I received divine guidance through this method. I used it to gain a divine promise and that promise was immediately fulflled. So I thought, `This is great. I'll use this method all the time.' I soon found I could randomly put my finger on any premeditated topic I wished. But only the first time did this seem to reflect divine guidance. I had just discovered a weird mental power that could easily deceive me if I treated the results as a sign." Then I said to Linda: "I think both your bibliomancy and mine were merely the result of our psychic powers. Just do what your heart tells you is right about the divorce issue." She divorced her husband and I developed a great relationship with a beautiful young woman as a result. :-) Don |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Brendan on Apr 27th, 2005 at 10:35pm
No disrespect intended, Don...
But might a Hindu, say, not get the same result from using a copy of the Vedas? Or for that matter, an open-minded agnostic (such as myself) from intense, un-doubting "Will" (might be tough to pull off, as these things seem to happen best when employed with firm belief, such as your belief in the authority in the Bible) using a copy of "Moby Dick?" (Or maybe better, Shakespeare or Plato...) Ultimately, I suppose there is no way to REALLY know whether these things stem from untapped powers or divine intervention... So at least in my case, it boils down to an EMOTIONALISTIC judgement. I can search as honestly (and courageously) as I can... OR, (at least in my own case) I can knuckle under to FEAR and let it taint my judgement. Fear is an ANIMAL'S emotion... and I cannot and will not believe that if there IS a Creator "out there", that he/she/it will punish me for behaving as a MAN, and rejecting fear, the emotion fit for a dog... In other words... in my reality, SOME pride is not a bad thing. That's just ME, you must understand. In no way am I implying that you don't have valid emotional reasons for embracing Biblical religion... B-man |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Berserk on Apr 27th, 2005 at 10:49pm
Perhaps. In fact that might be the basis for an interesting experiment. What gets me is that I seem to have some bizarre but useless psychic talents. For example, I speed-walk 7-10.5 miles several days a week. I notice that when I focus intently on certain street lights, they go off if they were on and go on if they were off. I also notice that passing cars generally seem to have no effect on them. The last time I zapped a light like this, it went out and simultaneously a parked car started honking like crazy as its headlights blinked on and off. To be honest, I suspect that this may all have a natural explanation. I have no effect on most street lights. But I'm frustrated that I have many useless psychic experiences and wonder how these might be harnessed to some useful purpose.
Don |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Brendan on Apr 27th, 2005 at 11:02pm
Likewise...
Every time a song is on the radio that I LIKE... it's almost over by the time I flip to the station it's playing on... But if I DON'T like a song (a lot more of them than I DO like) its just starting... Hmmm... some subconscious belief manifesting in an annoying way? Or just a probability thing (I like less than 10% of the music I hear, so I'm more likely to catch an "entire song" that I dislike?) Dunno. |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real& Post by Lights of Love on Apr 28th, 2005 at 5:26am
Don, I can identify with what you are saying here. Some years ago my energies would have an effect on mechanical things such as my car. I could go to the grocery store for example and when I was done shopping, I’d get in my car and it wouldn’t start. This happened quite frequently over several months. There was nothing wrong with the car according to the mechanics that who had checked it. Also, anyone else that I asked could get in and start it right up. I constantly had to ask strangers if they would start my car for me.
Other things happened, too, like windshield wipers start working without me turning them on, or stop working when I needed them most. Door locks would also lock or unlock. Seemed like I was always breaking something. Eventually I figured out that if I could break it, I could fix it by “blending” with it. My emotions seemed to play a part in this. If I was rushed, upset about something, angry, etc., I broke things. If my emotions were smooth and calm, I could fix things. Some time passed and others things had happened, but eventually I learned to direct the energy I was running and I eventually learned how to run healing energy. Guess what I’m saying is that it may only be a matter of you learning to direct the energy you are running. Love and peace, Kathy |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Snoopydoo on Apr 29th, 2005 at 8:29am
Hi,
I was wondering, for those of you who claim to have gone out of their body and float near the ceiling. Can't you get someone to put a written message on top of a cabinet inside your room so that when you go out-of-body, you could actually see the message and report back afterwards? This to me would prove that someone could go OBE and is ot in a dream which may seem real but is not... Did someone here ever did that? Thanks |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Raphael on Apr 29th, 2005 at 10:18am
Brendan,
actually I'm sure it happens for songs you like and dislike. The human brain is made in such a way that we easily see what is going against the norm. This is also why we tend to remember exceptions. So if you dislike something or a bad event happens to you, you WILL remember them. Good things tend to be forgotten since there is no point in remembering them. This is also why we tend to remember exceptions. |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real& Post by Author_JD_Howes on May 3rd, 2005 at 9:06pm
Brendan,
HEY THERE!!! ;D Was doing some browsing and saw your forum... Good Questions! How do we know we are REAL and not just a dream? I first had this question posed to me in 1978... in class. Our teacher was trying to play "Mind Games" with us. My Answers: 1) I'm just not this creative to imagine all this. 2) We are all suffering from global group daydreaming / nightmares. 3) In my dreams... computers wouldn't crash. 4) In my dreams... life would have one side...good. 5) If this isn't my dream... then whose is it? 6) And if this is someone else's dream... I want to talk to the script writer about my part! You said... "If the universe is indeed "mental"... then some amazing feats are INDEED possible... " JD's Reply: Agreed... it's called "insanity." Brendan, you have nothing to anchor your beliefs on. How can you live everyday wondering if this is all a dream or for real?-Does it even matter? -What will it change? Even if this world is NOT a dream, but real, you are still quite capable of many amazing mental feats... it's called "Thinking." :) "Thinking" (contrary to belief) is an endangered human art form. It is a rare gift. You possess it. Use it wisely my friend. DEFINE: REAL In some ways we could look at your question as seen through God the Creator's eyes... from his eternal perspective... our reality is made of Lesser Matter who's existence is confined with the limitations of time. God's Greater Matter is confined within eternity. I covered all this in my book "Forever: A Godyssey Adventure" because this concept intrigued me very much. From God's perspective, our entire physicalness may have the consistency of a ghost. And God is more solid than how we understand solidity. The superscience & supernatural laws are mind-boggling at best. That's what makes them exciting to explore... and try figuring out why they were designed this way. Author JD Howes www.jdhowes.com |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Brendan on May 4th, 2005 at 12:14am
AHA... welcome to MY thread, Mr. Howes. 8)
You speak of a "firm anchor" for my beliefs as being a desirable, or even necessary, thing. But consider this. Science is based on an ever-changing view of reality. Indeed, the STRENGTH of science (and I DO believe it ultimately has the answer for EVERYTHING... there is no such thing as magic, J.D.) is that it constantly EVOLVES. What we thought was true yesterday, is false today. We adapt our worldview. And so progress marches on... Would you call SCIENCE insanity, Mr. Howes? After all, it is not based a a "firm anchor of belief"... indeed, if it had one, it would not function. You would have me believe that it is better to have an UNCHANGING, rock-solid, unassailable belief system... You know, Mr. Howes... there was a time when almost everybody (including the "scientists" such as they were) believed this. We call it "The Middle Ages." During that era (500-1500 A.D.) writers called it the "Age of Faith." One thousand years of stagnation, barbarism, and institutionalized STUPIDITY. (And it could happen... AGAIN, Mr. Howes. Watch the news...) Not a time I'd have wanted to live in... how about YOU, J.D.??? In the spirit of INQUIRY, I am happy to see my beliefs evolve... for that is the only way to the truth. Science's track record PROVES it, my friend. And to conclude... in our back-and-forth exchanges, I have noticed something about you and myself, Mr. Howes. You crave security, and emotional salve (i.e., certainty and stability.) I crave freedom, and adventure (i.e., change and possibility.) F'rinstance, I'm guessing you'd enjoy "Family Circus." Me, I'm more of a "Far Side" kind of guy (*SIGH*... in comic strips, only the good die young...) We're two different men, you and I. But isn't variety the spice of life? If there is some kind of "God", I cannot help but believe he/she/it would agree... Cheers, B-man |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real& Post by Author_JD_Howes on May 5th, 2005 at 10:38pm
Brendan Buddy!
I just love "THE FAR SIDE!" But I wouldn't want to live there. But hey, since it really doesn't exist anyhow... who cares, right? The human intellect can be compared to the digestive tract. We can consume, consume and consume... but at some time, we must sit down and take a dump. :P -Why? If we don't... we will die from a massive build up of toxins caused by rotting, useless biological matter trapped in our digestive tract. The same thing applies to the mind. We can learn, learn and learn... but at some time, we must sit down and take a mental dump. :P -Why? If we don't... we die inside from the conflicting knowledge, logics & belief systems. Our heart becomes cold, jaded and arrogant by all the useless knowledge it carries around in it. And ultimately, such knowledge gives us the illusion of superiority... and that's all it is... an illusion. We need to sort out logical, rational and commonsensical information from... well, crap. :-/ If we don't it will rot away at our soul, our hopes, dreams and self-image. ASK THE FIRST QUESTION: WHAT ARE YOU REALLY AFRAID OF? - It isn't God, for sure. I think you are afraid of what you would find if you looked deep enough into your soul... or perhaps what you wouldn't find. What do you think? ??? P.S. 1) As for science... it's always changing its mind. 2) How do you know if MAGIC does not exist? Especially if science can't make up it's mind. Just another educated guess on your part? - Hmmmm 3) Make up your mind... why do you care about anything? Let alone what I say? What others say? If you are truly all learning & all knowledgable -You don't need us... FOR WE'RE NOT REAL! - REMEMBER? Yet, you find it important to prove your point about non-existence... wow, what a waste of time, if such a thing existed... Go Figure. 4) Brendan Quote "You crave security, and emotional salve (i.e., certainty and stability.) I crave freedom, and adventure (i.e., change and possibility.) " JD's Reply: Funny... I thought just the opposite and have stated so repeatably in my postings... hmmm. If diving into this hornets nest forum doesn't constitute as ADVENTURE... nothing will. Insecure and emotional cripples wouldn't stand a chance in this hopeless pit of wishers, dreamers and hopers. There is definitely no security or emotional salve to be found anywhere here... especially here. Can you feel the love? I think it's the other way around my friend. The only difference between us is... I've already figured it out. Now, I want to see if you're man enough to face yourself honestly... like I have. And you can't get mad at me because you don't believe in anything... including yourself... literally. I am just an annoying figment of your cosmic mentality or your wake up call. "Rise & Shine Brendan!" :D Comment? Author JD Howes www.jdhowes.com |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real& Post by Vicky on May 6th, 2005 at 10:00am
[quote author=Snoopydoo
Hi, I was wondering, for those of you who claim to have gone out of their body and float near the ceiling. Can't you get someone to put a written message on top of a cabinet inside your room so that when you go out-of-body, you could actually see the message and report back afterwards? This to me would prove that someone could go OBE and is ot in a dream which may seem real but is not... Did someone here ever did that? Thanks[/quote] Hi SnoopyDoo! I thought I'd answer your question before it gets totally lost in this thread. I remember hearing of this kind of OBE experiment many years ago. It is too long ago for me to remember the exact details but yes it's been done. What I know from OBE's is that the information we perceive while out of body can get distorted by us, so that we interpret it into something else. This is not true of all things, of course, but just some things. For instance, an author I like to read stated she had an OBE and walked around inside her house but discovered there was a window and a potted plant that didn't exist in the physical world. Another author talked about seeing a door leading to a basement during his OBE, but he knew in the physical world his house didn't have a basement. These things don't mean that the OBE wasn't a real experience. Just know that your perception in an OBE won't be exactly how you see in the physical world. I myself have had this happen, where one detail is altered but all the other facts and details are exact and can be proven. Vicky |
Title: TO MR. HOWES: IMPORTANT NOTICE. Post by Brendan on May 6th, 2005 at 10:43pm
Dear Mr. J.D. Howes:
If you haven't read it already, go to my last post on your own "How are you Dealing with the Afterlife" thread" and check out my last post ("Resurrection, Haitan style") and then CAREFULLY read and follow the (easy and fun!) instructions at the end of the post. After you have followed them, I will be happy to read whatever replies or postings you may have... Otherwise, please do *NOT* post to this thread again. Thanks, B-man 8) |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real& Post by Author_JD_Howes on May 10th, 2005 at 3:14pm
Dear Brendan,
Nothing in my replies can be deemed inappropriate for discussion... just simple biology analogy, logic & direct questions. You said yourself your background is in human biology ... and I enjoy writing about what people can relate to. These open forum strings are designed to "invite" new ideas, open-minds and sharing... not for rejecting such things. You've enjoyed emotionally flaming me without mercy on my "How Are You Dealing With The Afterlife" forum. Bruce Moen doesn't appreciate that kind of behavior from anyone... and I agree.(See Forum Rules) It ruins discussion strings for everyone. Wouldn't you agree? My guess is, my discussion string really struck a nerve with you to react so...fervently... you can't fool me, my friend. Think what you may of me... it matters not... what I care about... is you. Now, you are all upset because I asked several well-focused questions... and now you don't want to chat? Tsk Tsk What a shame... if these simpler spiritual questions upset you then I am glad I did not ask some even harder ones. You see, when you dig for truth... you ask more questions... and so forth. It's called learning... I hope you find the answers you seek... but whining about people who don't play by your rules will never change life, reality or the afterlife. I wish you well... P.S. My forum string is closed - Per Bruce Author JD Howes www.jdhowes.com |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real& Post by Brendan on May 10th, 2005 at 7:37pm
*****************
Dear Brendan, Nothing in my replies can be deemed inappropriate for discussion... just simple biology analogy, logic & direct questions. You said yourself your background is in human biology ... and I enjoy writing about what people can relate to. These open forum strings are designed to "invite" new ideas, open-minds and sharing... not for rejecting such things. You've enjoyed emotionally flaming me without mercy on my "How Are You Dealing With The Afterlife" forum. Bruce Moen doesn't appreciate that kind of behavior from anyone... and I agree.(See Forum Rules) It ruins discussion strings for everyone. Wouldn't you agree? My guess is, my discussion string really struck a nerve with you to react so...fervently... you can't fool me, my friend. Think what you may of me... it matters not... what I care about... is you. Now, you are all upset because I asked several well-focused questions... and now you don't want to chat? Tsk Tsk. What a shame... if these simpler spiritual questions upset you then I am glad I did not ask some even harder ones. You see, when you dig for truth... you ask more questions... and so forth. It's called learning... I hope you find the answers you seek... but whining about people who don't play by your rules will never change life, reality or the afterlife. I wish you well... P.S. My forum string is closed - Per Bruce Author JD Howes www.jdhowes.com ***************** I simply asked you to read the essays I posted. You are either too lazy to read them, or you think they are "damned atheist essays" or whatever. (They're not, but do you care?) Or (I suspect this) you are AFRAID to read them. You chose to put your brain in neutral a long time ago, J.D., and decided that NOT THINKING TOO MUCH was the "safe course to steer." I refuse to do the same. If refusing to do like you did (that is, to adopt the mentality of an illiterate Irish peat-digger) causes me to be damned to Hell... SO BE IT!!! You're right... I can't argue with you. How can I? Arguing with people like you is a bit like having a boxing match with someone who won't even put up his gloves. Oh yeah... you'll WIN the debate to, Mr. Howes. You'll win it just like MacNamara "won" the Vietnam War... you'll just declare victory and bail as soon as you get into trouble. (Regardless as to whether you made a single salient point or not, which I have yet to see you do...) So why should I bother? Your proselytizing ain't worth it. Your god ain't worth it. And YOU ain't worth it, Buds. Why should I waste my time arguing with a rigid formula thinker who's too lazy to look at resources I posted? I took the time to read excerpts from that B-grade stinker you wrote... and let me tell you, it was about as much fun as a five-finger prostate examination. But you won't even take 30 minutes out of your life to look at the resources I suggested for you? (Especially considering that I meant them for your personal edification, and to help you better understand the people you're dealing with on this site?) Then screw ya. Have a nice "life"... :P B-man |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real& Post by Author_JD_Howes on May 11th, 2005 at 2:21pm
Brendan,
I've spent a great many years studying a wide range of belief systems... and personally... Atheism is my favorite because of the incredible amount of faith it takes not to believe in God or anything... in spite of the overwhelming levels of complex data that says otherwise... Now, Buddism is coming in a close second because it's native roots can be traced back to a man making the first scientific notes about nature and building a natural religion around it based on his observations. -But I digress... And when it comes to those sharing their opinions, essays and viewpoints on Chrisitanity... it's just the same old derogatory slamming show. It gets kinda boring after a while reading the same old uninformed stuff... sorry, but you guys really need to get some new material. The old arguments just don't hold water. You see, as I've pointed out on many occasions... emotional insults are all that are left to someone who cannot defend their thoughts, ideaologies, beliefs or position on anything. The problem with believing in nothing is... it leaves you weak, vulnerable and empty... and at a great disadvantage when so much evidence dictates the opposite. I may be an real annoyance to many because of my rock solid beliefs in Jesus Christ; others may question my motives, emotional stability and such... but I just consider the source. I know what I know because I survived long enough to learn something new. I've been baptized in the fires, trials and hatreds of life and have won these spiritual battle wounds the hard way. I'm no simpleton quoting pie-in-the-sky philosophies... I LIVE MY FAITH EVERY DAY. I SEE MY FAITH & BELIEF IN GOD BECOME REAL... EVERYDAY. I have an imperfect viewpoint on my faith in God because I try making him what I THINK HE SHOULD BE... and usually isn't! And since I've finally learned whose the boss in my life... I've learned God's ways really do make sense for this life. Annoying... yes... but smart! I BELIEVE IN SOMETHING BRENDAN. I Believe In God. I am stronger for it than you... NOT BETTER. I've quit fighting my Creator because I realized how stupid I looked doing so... when I got real and weighed the real evidences of life more objectively... over a 20 year period. More than that... my faith in GOD is REAL because it has literally saved my life several times when I should have died... and did not. And no rational or scientific explantion could be provided. Brendan, I was not kidding, joking or ridiculing you when I said I care what happens to you. I really do want you to find your answers. I want everyone on this site to find what they are looking for! And I want those answers to calm all your anger, fears and frustrations with this life and give you all the stability, confidence, blessings and joyful strength you are entitled to. It just takes tapping into a power source stronger than yourself to grow beyond what you thought was possible for your life. Don't take my word for it... like everyone else, I've just shared what has worked wonderfully for me. I take immense pride in Jesus Christ... not as a religion... but as the person he has revealed himself to me as over the years through the lives of others. Please don't settle for anything less than the best spiritual power for your life, my friend. No matter how much you may not like me, flame me, annoy me, get frustrated and dog me...etc. I WILL STILL BELIEVE IN YOU, Brendan... And I will continue to make it my focus to encourage you, lift you up, treat you respectfully and always be completely honest with you. As a human being you deserve to be treated with dignity. I am not here to win... I am not here to feel superior... I am not here to uphold my ego... I am here to be real. I am here to speak what I know to be true; have experienced personally and stand on confidently until the day my personal deadline carries me into the afterlife. Something this awesome should be shared with all... If I can't trust Christ with my life how can I dare trust him with my eternity? JD |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by blink on May 11th, 2005 at 4:25pm
Brendan, I respect your desire to verify, examine, explore to your heart's delight.
Quote from Mr. Howes: I have an imperfect viewpoint on my faith in God because I try making him what I THINK HE SHOULD BE... and usually isn't! Mr. Howes, I think if you examine your above quote you may find that you are mistaken in the belief that Brendan's life experience or afterlife experience is somehow lacking because he does not accept what you have just admitted is your own imperfect reality. We are all searching, Mr. Howes, you, me, Brendan, all of us....you cannot see reality for Brendan and neither can he see reality for you... respectfully, blink |
Title: Re: Verifying this stuff is all "For Real&quo Post by Brendan on May 12th, 2005 at 8:49pm
WELL said, Blink.
And I have nothing more to say to J.D., as I have no interest in being drawn into a U.S. in Iraq-equivalent "intellectual quagmire" which will at best end up going in a circle. The current Iraq debacle is a good analogy, really... I'd have rationality and logic (POWER!) on my side (like the U.S.) but he's got obstinacy and thick-skulled PERSEVERANCE on his side (like the insurgents.) AND, just like George Bush being interviewed on the eve of our ill-advised excursion into Iraq in 2003, he'll just keep drumming on the same response ("Weapons of Mass Destruction"/ "Something REAL to Believe In") to every question and statement I pose. When I get tired and quit (like the U.S. eventually will in Iraq) he can then call himself the winner (like Al-Qaeda will when we pull out.) "Guerrilla Warfare" debating anyone? I'll take a raincheck. Our friend Mr. Howes claims miracles from his "God"; he refuses to see that followers of other faiths, belief systems (or lack thereof!) and what have you can lay claim to similar experiences. I myself have had some VERY close scrapes, and I was a mechanistic materialist atheist for most of my life! Yet here I am... alive, kicking, and well. Mr. Howes wants to "kow-tow" to a "King" that OTHER FALLIBLE HUMANS told him about? Good for him. Me, I'll find my own way... like the rest of the fallible humans who come to this awesome site to LEARN, not proselytize, threaten, or insult. I mean... is Ultimate Truth like a hot potato, to be handed to the next fallible person, who frantically hands it to the NEXT fallible person, ad nauseum? (Hey - I just described the very ESSENCE of proselytizing..!) I think NOT. ...AMEN. B-man |
Conversation Board » Powered by YaBB 2.4! YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved. |