WOW !  :o

Marilyn found a great arcticle today but she didn't post it here. I think she made a biiiiig mistake  >:(

So I share it here !
http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=126649

Thanks Marilyn !
;D

Raphael, I posted it on the announcements and news forum that Bruce created for links. LOL  But I guess it's ok to post in here too as others do also.  Anyway, you're welcome. ;-)  I thought it was very interesting myself.

Love, Mairlyn ;-)

Oops, I see I should have put it in the Link's forum. Oh well, it's getting plenty of coverage now. ;-)

Love, Mairlyn ;-)

ah yes you are right I didnt even notice that forum...

there are too much forums in here :o

  Thanks for bringing up that article here, Raphael, and thanks for finding it Mairlyn!   Quite interesting and important for scientific research into "paranormal" stuff...

 But i don't know what this quote in the article has to do with anything they talk about "The machine apparently sensed the September 11 attacks... - but in the fevered mood of conspiracy theories of the time, the claims were swiftly knocked back by sceptics."

 

This may be the machine that was in use, when Art Bell told his
audience to try to affect the machine with their minds. It produced
a huge spike on the graph that was attached to the machine. The
graph came up to a sharp point, way, way above the surrounding
random trace.

I am glad you posted it, because I skipped it the first time I saw
it. I am always short of time, so a "black box that predicts the
future" sounded to me like just another one of those silly things.

This is what I was talking about when I made a post 3-26-05
which I will repeat here:

What you saw was what Seth called the "probable future".
All events have a set of presets that extend far into the past, before they take place. Every event is formed by its presets. Conditions exist that will pretty much determine where each person will be at what time. These presets, as they become stronger and the result more inevitable, automatically form images in the astral.

This is a breakthrough in that it represents a sort of astral
detector. It demonstrates a direct acting of the astral on the
physical. This is relevant to the question of whether events
occur only because of previous physical events, or whether
events happen first in the astral, and are somehow conveyed
into the physical. This is what I was talking about when I said
in a previous post, that a psychic field is always present to a
greater or less degree, as part of the formation of events.